Speaking up in Nursing: What Policy Promises and Practice Delivers.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2026.2676204
Rachel Kornhaber, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary
{"title":"Speaking up in Nursing: What Policy Promises and Practice Delivers.","authors":"Rachel Kornhaber, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2026.2676204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speaking up is widely positioned as a core expectation of nursing practice, embedded in professional standards, codes of conduct, and organisational policy. Nurses are taught that raising concerns is central to patient safety, ethical care and professional accountability. Yet for many nurses, the experience of speaking up in practice falls short of this promise. This discussion paper examines the gap between policy rhetoric and workplace realities, and how this disconnect shapes nurses' behaviour, wellbeing, and professional identity. Drawing on contemporary literature, we explore how nurses learn informal rules about voice through everyday interactions, observing how concerns are received, who is protected, and whose voices are marginalised. In settings where encouragement to speak up is not matched by reliable protection, nurses are required to navigate significant psychosocial risk. Repeated exposure to negative responses, scrutiny, or exclusion can contribute to moral distress, hypervigilance and emotional exhaustion. Some nurses respond by limiting engagement, withdrawing from discussions, or avoiding situations in which concerns may arise. These behaviours are frequently misinterpreted as disengagement or a lack of resilience, rather than understood as adaptive strategies for self-protection in environments perceived as unsafe. We argue that silence in nursing should be recognised as a rational response to organisational conditions that fail to safeguard those who raise concerns. Reframing silence in this way shifts attention away from individual blame and towards the structural, cultural and leadership factors that shape whether speaking up is genuinely safe in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"982-987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2026.2676204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speaking up is widely positioned as a core expectation of nursing practice, embedded in professional standards, codes of conduct, and organisational policy. Nurses are taught that raising concerns is central to patient safety, ethical care and professional accountability. Yet for many nurses, the experience of speaking up in practice falls short of this promise. This discussion paper examines the gap between policy rhetoric and workplace realities, and how this disconnect shapes nurses' behaviour, wellbeing, and professional identity. Drawing on contemporary literature, we explore how nurses learn informal rules about voice through everyday interactions, observing how concerns are received, who is protected, and whose voices are marginalised. In settings where encouragement to speak up is not matched by reliable protection, nurses are required to navigate significant psychosocial risk. Repeated exposure to negative responses, scrutiny, or exclusion can contribute to moral distress, hypervigilance and emotional exhaustion. Some nurses respond by limiting engagement, withdrawing from discussions, or avoiding situations in which concerns may arise. These behaviours are frequently misinterpreted as disengagement or a lack of resilience, rather than understood as adaptive strategies for self-protection in environments perceived as unsafe. We argue that silence in nursing should be recognised as a rational response to organisational conditions that fail to safeguard those who raise concerns. Reframing silence in this way shifts attention away from individual blame and towards the structural, cultural and leadership factors that shape whether speaking up is genuinely safe in practice.

在《护理:政策承诺和实践带来什么》一书中大声疾呼。
直言不讳被广泛定位为护理实践的核心期望,嵌入专业标准、行为准则和组织政策中。护士们被教导,提高关注对患者安全、道德护理和专业责任至关重要。然而,对许多护士来说,在实践中直言不讳的经历与这一承诺相差甚远。本讨论文件探讨了政策修辞与工作场所现实之间的差距,以及这种脱节如何影响护士的行为、福祉和职业认同。借鉴当代文献,我们探索护士如何通过日常互动学习关于声音的非正式规则,观察如何接受关注,谁受到保护,谁的声音被边缘化。在鼓励说出来并没有可靠保护的情况下,护士需要应对重大的社会心理风险。反复暴露于负面反应、审视或排斥会导致道德困扰、过度警惕和情绪疲惫。一些护士的反应是限制参与,退出讨论,或避免可能引起担忧的情况。这些行为经常被误解为脱离接触或缺乏适应力,而不是被理解为在被认为不安全的环境中进行自我保护的适应性策略。我们认为,沉默的护理应该被认为是一个理性的反应,组织条件,未能保护那些谁提出关切。以这种方式重塑沉默,将注意力从个人指责转移到结构、文化和领导因素上,这些因素决定了直言不讳在实践中是否真正安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书