On the impact of inequity on the attainment of health results in the African Region: a methodological exploration.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Humphrey Karamagi, Sokona Sy, Joseph Mung'atu, Anabay Mamo, Bertha Kembabazi, Hillary Kipruto, Benson Droti
{"title":"On the impact of inequity on the attainment of health results in the African Region: a methodological exploration.","authors":"Humphrey Karamagi, Sokona Sy, Joseph Mung'atu, Anabay Mamo, Bertha Kembabazi, Hillary Kipruto, Benson Droti","doi":"10.1186/s12939-026-02935-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The core of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is ensuring everyone can access essential health services without financial hardship, shifting focus from specific interventions to individual outcomes. Yet, in the WHO African region, there remains a critical gap in understanding the interrelations of the dimensions of health inequities with each other, and with health outcomes. This paper explores the interrelations among inequity drivers to inform their prioritization in each country of the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed the association of the commonly used eight drivers of health inequity (independent variable): residence, ethnicity, occupation, gender, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital, with differences in health results across countries (dependent variable). UHC indices served as the indicators for the dependent variable. Data came from the Demographic and Health Surveys with normalized indices for ethnicity and religion from prior studies. Missing values were imputed. Principal Component Analysis generated weighted composite indices, and inequity gaps were normalized to a 0-1 scale. Partial Least Squares regression examined relationships while addressing multicollinearity. Model validation used Root Mean Square Error of Prediction and explained variance, verified against known country-level inequity patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health inequity in the WHO African Region shows marked disparities, with an average composite gap of 0.49 (± 0.038) on a 0-1 scale. Angola (0.79), Kenya (0.68), and Chad (0.67) record the highest inequities, while Algeria and Equatorial Guinea (0.31) show greater equity. Ethnicity is the strongest driver (0.65), creating 30% more disparity than wealth (0.55) or social capital (0.56). Four latent variables emerged as drivers of inequity and explained up to 77% of the variance in UHC service coverage across countries. These are personal characteristics, geographic residence, social networks, and socioeconomic position.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major emerging drivers of inequity are not the same drivers of inequality. It is more targeted to focus on deciphering the four emerging latent variables as drivers of inequities to align with the need for person-centred health services required in the PHC approach for attaining UHC results - a shift away from the common programmatic focus of the eight drivers of inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02935-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The core of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is ensuring everyone can access essential health services without financial hardship, shifting focus from specific interventions to individual outcomes. Yet, in the WHO African region, there remains a critical gap in understanding the interrelations of the dimensions of health inequities with each other, and with health outcomes. This paper explores the interrelations among inequity drivers to inform their prioritization in each country of the region.

Methods: This study analysed the association of the commonly used eight drivers of health inequity (independent variable): residence, ethnicity, occupation, gender, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital, with differences in health results across countries (dependent variable). UHC indices served as the indicators for the dependent variable. Data came from the Demographic and Health Surveys with normalized indices for ethnicity and religion from prior studies. Missing values were imputed. Principal Component Analysis generated weighted composite indices, and inequity gaps were normalized to a 0-1 scale. Partial Least Squares regression examined relationships while addressing multicollinearity. Model validation used Root Mean Square Error of Prediction and explained variance, verified against known country-level inequity patterns.

Results: Health inequity in the WHO African Region shows marked disparities, with an average composite gap of 0.49 (± 0.038) on a 0-1 scale. Angola (0.79), Kenya (0.68), and Chad (0.67) record the highest inequities, while Algeria and Equatorial Guinea (0.31) show greater equity. Ethnicity is the strongest driver (0.65), creating 30% more disparity than wealth (0.55) or social capital (0.56). Four latent variables emerged as drivers of inequity and explained up to 77% of the variance in UHC service coverage across countries. These are personal characteristics, geographic residence, social networks, and socioeconomic position.

Conclusion: The major emerging drivers of inequity are not the same drivers of inequality. It is more targeted to focus on deciphering the four emerging latent variables as drivers of inequities to align with the need for person-centred health services required in the PHC approach for attaining UHC results - a shift away from the common programmatic focus of the eight drivers of inequality.

关于不平等对实现非洲区域保健成果的影响:方法探索。
背景:全民健康覆盖的核心是确保每个人都能在没有经济困难的情况下获得基本卫生服务,将重点从具体干预措施转向个人结果。然而,在世卫组织非洲区域,在了解卫生不平等各方面之间的相互关系以及与卫生结果之间的相互关系方面,仍然存在重大差距。本文探讨了不平等驱动因素之间的相互关系,以告知其在该地区每个国家的优先级。方法:本研究分析了常用的八个健康不平等驱动因素(自变量):居住地、种族、职业、性别、宗教、教育、社会经济地位和社会资本与各国健康结果差异(因变量)之间的关系。UHC指数作为因变量的指标。数据来自人口与健康调查,其中种族和宗教的标准化指数来自先前的研究。缺失值被输入。主成分分析生成加权复合指数,不平等差距归一化为0-1的尺度。偏最小二乘回归检查关系,同时解决多重共线性。模型验证使用预测的均方根误差和解释方差,根据已知的国家层面的不平等模式进行验证。结果:世卫组织非洲区域的卫生不平等表现出明显的差异,在0-1的范围内,平均综合差距为0.49(±0.038)。安哥拉(0.79)、肯尼亚(0.68)、乍得(0.67)的不平等程度最高,阿尔及利亚和赤道几内亚(0.31)的不平等程度更高。种族是最大的驱动因素(0.65),造成的差距比财富(0.55)或社会资本(0.56)高出30%。四个潜在变量成为不平等的驱动因素,并解释了各国全民健康覆盖服务覆盖率高达77%的差异。这些是个人特征、地理居住地、社会网络和社会经济地位。结论:新兴的主要不平等驱动因素并不是不平等的驱动因素。更有针对性的是,将重点放在解读作为不平等驱动因素的四个新出现的潜在变量上,以配合初级保健方法实现全民健康覆盖结果所需的以人为本的卫生服务需求——这偏离了对8个不平等驱动因素的共同规划重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书