The single venipuncture, two-set sampling method for blood cultures in Japan.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Itaru Nakamura, Riho Plubo, Yuri Miura, Ayaka Umeda, Rumiko Imura, Yuki Watanabe, Tomohide Shimodaira, Hidehiro Watanabe
{"title":"The single venipuncture, two-set sampling method for blood cultures in Japan.","authors":"Itaru Nakamura, Riho Plubo, Yuri Miura, Ayaka Umeda, Rumiko Imura, Yuki Watanabe, Tomohide Shimodaira, Hidehiro Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Reported advantages of the single-venipuncture, two-set sampling method (single sampling) for blood cultures include improved microbial detection sensitivity and a reduction of contamination rates, and puncture discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study investigated the outcome of converting from the multi-sampling to the single-sampling method. The multi-sampling method was employed from January 1, 2023, to June 31, 2024, and the single-sampling method was employed from October 1, 2024, to December 31, 2025. The number of blood cultures submitted, two-set sampling rate, contamination rates, and antimicrobial use density (AUD) and days of therapy (DOT) of vancomycin (VCM) during these two periods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of blood culture bottles per 1000 patient-days and two-set sampling rate (%) per month were significantly higher in the single-sampling method (76.93 and 75.6%) than in the multi-sampling method (70.81 and 72.4%, P < 0.05). The contamination rate decreased significantly from 0.56% in multi-sampling method to 0.38% in the single-sampling method (P < 0.05). The AUD and DOT of VCM decreased from 1.27 to 1.00 and from 1.80 to 1.33, respectively (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of the single-sampling method resulted in increased bottles and two-set rates, with decreased contamination rates and VCM administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108947"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Reported advantages of the single-venipuncture, two-set sampling method (single sampling) for blood cultures include improved microbial detection sensitivity and a reduction of contamination rates, and puncture discomfort.

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study investigated the outcome of converting from the multi-sampling to the single-sampling method. The multi-sampling method was employed from January 1, 2023, to June 31, 2024, and the single-sampling method was employed from October 1, 2024, to December 31, 2025. The number of blood cultures submitted, two-set sampling rate, contamination rates, and antimicrobial use density (AUD) and days of therapy (DOT) of vancomycin (VCM) during these two periods were compared.

Results: The average number of blood culture bottles per 1000 patient-days and two-set sampling rate (%) per month were significantly higher in the single-sampling method (76.93 and 75.6%) than in the multi-sampling method (70.81 and 72.4%, P < 0.05). The contamination rate decreased significantly from 0.56% in multi-sampling method to 0.38% in the single-sampling method (P < 0.05). The AUD and DOT of VCM decreased from 1.27 to 1.00 and from 1.80 to 1.33, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Use of the single-sampling method resulted in increased bottles and two-set rates, with decreased contamination rates and VCM administration.

日本血液培养的单静脉穿刺、两组取样方法。
背景:据报道,单静脉穿刺两组采样法(单次采样)的血液培养的优点包括提高微生物检测灵敏度和减少污染率,以及穿刺不适。方法:本研究采用回顾性的纵向研究方法,探讨由多采样法转为单采样法的结果。2023年1月1日至2024年6月31日采用多采样法,2024年10月1日至2025年12月31日采用单采样法。比较这两个时间段提交的血培养数、两组采样率、污染率以及万古霉素(VCM)的抗菌药物使用密度(AUD)和治疗天数(DOT)。结果:单次采样法的血培养瓶数(76.93和75.6%)显著高于多次采样法(70.81和72.4%,p< 0.05)。污染率由多次采样的0.56%显著降低至单次采样的0.38% (p< 0.05)。VCM的AUD由1.27降至1.00,DOT由1.80降至1.33 (p< 0.05)。结论:采用单次取样法,增加了取样瓶数量和取样率,降低了污染率和VCM的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书