Effects of Traditional Chinese Acupoint Massage Combined with Tailored Tai Chi on Low Back Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Shuaipan Zhang, Yongchao Wang, Chongjie Yao, Xin Zhou, Guangxin Guo, Jianhua Li, Min Fang, Qingguang Zhu
{"title":"Effects of Traditional Chinese Acupoint Massage Combined with Tailored Tai Chi on Low Back Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Shuaipan Zhang, Yongchao Wang, Chongjie Yao, Xin Zhou, Guangxin Guo, Jianhua Li, Min Fang, Qingguang Zhu","doi":"10.1159/000553337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese acupoint massage (TCAM) combined with tailored tai chi on pain, disability, and selected quality-of-life domains in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients with LDH and low back pain (LBP) were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG, TCAM + tailored tai chi, n = 36) or a control group (CG, TCAM alone, n = 36). Interventions were conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10 points) and selected domains of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Baseline participant and therapist expectation scores were recorded, and sensitivity analyses were performed adjusting for these scores. ANCOVA adjusted for baseline outcome values, age, sex, and disease duration was used for between-group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was applied for SF-36 subscales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome ODI decreased significantly more in the IG than in the CG (from 26.58 ± 7.79 to 9.67 ± 3.10 vs. 28.72 ± 9.25 to 15.69 ± 4.26; adjusted mean difference = 3.88, 95% CI: 0.50-7.27, p = 0.026). VAS scores improved on the 0-10 scale from 6.47 ± 1.47 to 2.21 ± 0.96 in the IG and from 6.71 ± 1.32 to 2.92 ± 0.99 in the CG, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.18-1.43, p = 0.012). Among SF-36 subscales, significant between-group differences after Bonferroni correction were observed in physical functioning, bodily pain, vitality, and mental health. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for expectation scores yielded consistent results. The total effective rate was 94.44% in the IG vs. 83.33% in the CG (p = 0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCAM combined with tailored tai chi significantly improved functional disability, pain intensity, and selected quality-of-life domains compared with TCAM alone over 4 weeks. Sensitivity analyses suggest that these effects are robust and independent of baseline expectation scores. This multimodal physical therapy may be considered a complementary conservative treatment for patients with LBP due to LDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000553337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese acupoint massage (TCAM) combined with tailored tai chi on pain, disability, and selected quality-of-life domains in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods: Seventy-two patients with LDH and low back pain (LBP) were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG, TCAM + tailored tai chi, n = 36) or a control group (CG, TCAM alone, n = 36). Interventions were conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10 points) and selected domains of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Baseline participant and therapist expectation scores were recorded, and sensitivity analyses were performed adjusting for these scores. ANCOVA adjusted for baseline outcome values, age, sex, and disease duration was used for between-group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was applied for SF-36 subscales.

Results: The primary outcome ODI decreased significantly more in the IG than in the CG (from 26.58 ± 7.79 to 9.67 ± 3.10 vs. 28.72 ± 9.25 to 15.69 ± 4.26; adjusted mean difference = 3.88, 95% CI: 0.50-7.27, p = 0.026). VAS scores improved on the 0-10 scale from 6.47 ± 1.47 to 2.21 ± 0.96 in the IG and from 6.71 ± 1.32 to 2.92 ± 0.99 in the CG, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.18-1.43, p = 0.012). Among SF-36 subscales, significant between-group differences after Bonferroni correction were observed in physical functioning, bodily pain, vitality, and mental health. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for expectation scores yielded consistent results. The total effective rate was 94.44% in the IG vs. 83.33% in the CG (p = 0.26).

Conclusion: TCAM combined with tailored tai chi significantly improved functional disability, pain intensity, and selected quality-of-life domains compared with TCAM alone over 4 weeks. Sensitivity analyses suggest that these effects are robust and independent of baseline expectation scores. This multimodal physical therapy may be considered a complementary conservative treatment for patients with LBP due to LDH.

中医穴位按摩结合量身定制的太极治疗腰椎间盘突出症腰痛的疗效:TCAM +太极治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照试验。
目的:评价中医穴位按摩(TCAM)结合量身定制太极治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者疼痛、残疾和生活质量的临床疗效。方法:将72例LDH合并腰痛(LBP)患者随机分为干预组(IG, TCAM +量身太极,n = 36)和对照组(CG, TCAM单独,n = 36)。干预每周进行3次,持续4周。主要观察指标为Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)。次要结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS, 0-10分)和36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的选定领域。记录基线参与者和治疗师期望评分,并对这些评分进行敏感性分析。采用ANCOVA校正基线转归值、年龄、性别和疾病持续时间进行组间比较。SF-36分量表采用Bonferroni校正。结果:IG组ODI下降明显高于CG组(26.58±7.79 ~ 9.67±3.10 vs 28.72±9.25 ~ 15.69±4.26;调整后平均差异= 3.88,95% CI 0.50 ~ 7.27, P = 0.026)。IG组VAS评分从6.47±1.47提高到2.21±0.96,CG组从6.71±1.32提高到2.92±0.99,调整后组间差异为0.47 (95% CI 0.18-1.43, P=0.012)。在SF-36量表中,经Bonferroni校正后,在身体功能、身体疼痛、活力和心理健康方面组间差异显著。调整期望分数的敏感性分析产生了一致的结果。IG组总有效率94.44%,CG组总有效率83.33% (P = 0.26)。结论:与单独使用TCAM相比,TCAM联合量身定制的太极在4周内显着改善了功能障碍,疼痛强度和选择的生活质量领域。敏感性分析表明,这些影响是稳健的,独立于基线期望评分。这种多模式物理治疗可以被认为是LDH所致腰痛患者的补充保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书