{"title":"The cardiorespiratory response of Atlantic salmon and Nile tilapia to similar acute thermal and hypoxic challenges: the complete story.","authors":"Emma Scarlett Porter, A Kurt Gamperl","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00116.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We used two diverse teleost species (Atlantic salmon and Nile tilapia) to examine the extent to which the regulation of central venous pressure [CVP; and thus, stroke volume (V<sub>S</sub>) and cardiac output ([Formula: see text])] and blood oxygen extraction (EO<sub>2</sub>) may differ in fishes when exposed to individual, and combined, stressors. These included: <i>1</i>) acute warming under normoxia, during simultaneous hypoxia, or when heart rate (<i>f</i><sub>H</sub>) was reduced using zatebradine and <i>2</i>) acute cooling in tilapia. When normoxic: both species increased EO<sub>2</sub> and [Formula: see text] (by ∼2.5- and 1.75-fold, respectively) to meet their aerobic demands (ṀO<sub>2</sub>) when warmed; although [Formula: see text] was primarily mediated via changes in <i>f</i><sub>H</sub>, increases in CVP were critical for maintaining V<sub>S</sub>, especially in salmon at high temperatures; and CVP was generally negative in tilapia, but decidedly positive in salmon. Salmon showed a strong positive relationship between EO<sub>2</sub> and ṀO<sub>2</sub> under all conditions, but could not elevate EO<sub>2</sub> when [Formula: see text] plateaued at high temperatures. In contrast, tilapia were able to increase ṀO<sub>2</sub> as they approached their critical thermal maximum (CT<sub>Max</sub>) because EO<sub>2</sub> continued to rise after [Formula: see text]<sub>Max</sub> was reached. Finally, although the CT<sub>Max</sub> of both species when normoxic was ∼15°C above their acclimation temperature, only the salmon's CT<sub>Max</sub> was constrained by hypoxia or zatebradine (by >5°C and 2°C, respectively). These data provide three novel insights: <i>1</i>) changes in CVP are both species- and temperature-dependent; <i>2</i>) the contribution of CVP to V<sub>S</sub>, and EO<sub>2</sub> to ṀO<sub>2</sub>, are very different between these species; and <i>3</i>) there are important gaps in our understanding of fish cardiorespiratory physiology.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Central venous pressure (CVP) is temperature-dependent and species-specific in fishes. Negative versus positive CVP values in tilapia versus salmon, respectively, and a greater scope for CVP in salmon, reflect differences in cardiac filling and pumping capacities. Hypoxia exposure and zatebradine administration show that tissue oxygen extraction can help meet the oxygen requirements of some fishes when cardiac output is constrained. Tilapia, but not salmon, were able to preserve their upper thermal tolerance under all conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":" ","pages":"R232-R253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00116.2026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We used two diverse teleost species (Atlantic salmon and Nile tilapia) to examine the extent to which the regulation of central venous pressure [CVP; and thus, stroke volume (VS) and cardiac output ([Formula: see text])] and blood oxygen extraction (EO2) may differ in fishes when exposed to individual, and combined, stressors. These included: 1) acute warming under normoxia, during simultaneous hypoxia, or when heart rate (fH) was reduced using zatebradine and 2) acute cooling in tilapia. When normoxic: both species increased EO2 and [Formula: see text] (by ∼2.5- and 1.75-fold, respectively) to meet their aerobic demands (ṀO2) when warmed; although [Formula: see text] was primarily mediated via changes in fH, increases in CVP were critical for maintaining VS, especially in salmon at high temperatures; and CVP was generally negative in tilapia, but decidedly positive in salmon. Salmon showed a strong positive relationship between EO2 and ṀO2 under all conditions, but could not elevate EO2 when [Formula: see text] plateaued at high temperatures. In contrast, tilapia were able to increase ṀO2 as they approached their critical thermal maximum (CTMax) because EO2 continued to rise after [Formula: see text]Max was reached. Finally, although the CTMax of both species when normoxic was ∼15°C above their acclimation temperature, only the salmon's CTMax was constrained by hypoxia or zatebradine (by >5°C and 2°C, respectively). These data provide three novel insights: 1) changes in CVP are both species- and temperature-dependent; 2) the contribution of CVP to VS, and EO2 to ṀO2, are very different between these species; and 3) there are important gaps in our understanding of fish cardiorespiratory physiology.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Central venous pressure (CVP) is temperature-dependent and species-specific in fishes. Negative versus positive CVP values in tilapia versus salmon, respectively, and a greater scope for CVP in salmon, reflect differences in cardiac filling and pumping capacities. Hypoxia exposure and zatebradine administration show that tissue oxygen extraction can help meet the oxygen requirements of some fishes when cardiac output is constrained. Tilapia, but not salmon, were able to preserve their upper thermal tolerance under all conditions.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.