There Is More to Crowdshipping Than Money: Understanding How Operational Characteristics Influence Driver Behaviors

IF 10.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Operations Management Pub Date : 2026-07-02 Epub Date: 2026-05-19 DOI:10.1002/joom.70046
Nicolò Masorgo, David D. Dobrzykowski, Christopher S. Tang, Brian S. Fugate
{"title":"There Is More to Crowdshipping Than Money: Understanding How Operational Characteristics Influence Driver Behaviors","authors":"Nicolò Masorgo,&nbsp;David D. Dobrzykowski,&nbsp;Christopher S. Tang,&nbsp;Brian S. Fugate","doi":"10.1002/joom.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The increasing cost of last-mile delivery has motivated omnichannel grocery retailers to implement <i>crowdshipping</i>. Crowdshipping is a platform-based last-mile delivery model that relies on engaging drivers who are independent contractors to quickly accept delivery tasks. While studies often focus on the impact of monetary incentives, we draw on perspectives from the service operations literature to explore the moderating effect of three theoretical mechanisms (effort efficiency, uncertainty, and utility), on the curvilinear relationship between monetary incentives and driver engagement. Specifically, we test how <i>delivery density</i>, <i>delivery type</i> (attended vs. unattended), and <i>time of the day</i> interact with monetary incentives to influence driver's task acceptance response time. Econometric analyses of a dataset comprising about two million observations from a US Fortune 100 grocery retailer's crowdshipping platform confirm the “diminishing negative” effect of remuneration on task acceptance time. More importantly, we reveal that task operational characteristics affect how monetary incentives influence task acceptance time. While task density and unattended deliveries amplify the curvilinear relationship, evening tasks flatten it and are accepted slower than those scheduled in the daytime. Our findings suggest that drivers evaluate tasks based on perceived effort, uncertainty, and utility, offering valuable insights for platforms and future research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 5","pages":"710-729"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing cost of last-mile delivery has motivated omnichannel grocery retailers to implement crowdshipping. Crowdshipping is a platform-based last-mile delivery model that relies on engaging drivers who are independent contractors to quickly accept delivery tasks. While studies often focus on the impact of monetary incentives, we draw on perspectives from the service operations literature to explore the moderating effect of three theoretical mechanisms (effort efficiency, uncertainty, and utility), on the curvilinear relationship between monetary incentives and driver engagement. Specifically, we test how delivery density, delivery type (attended vs. unattended), and time of the day interact with monetary incentives to influence driver's task acceptance response time. Econometric analyses of a dataset comprising about two million observations from a US Fortune 100 grocery retailer's crowdshipping platform confirm the “diminishing negative” effect of remuneration on task acceptance time. More importantly, we reveal that task operational characteristics affect how monetary incentives influence task acceptance time. While task density and unattended deliveries amplify the curvilinear relationship, evening tasks flatten it and are accepted slower than those scheduled in the daytime. Our findings suggest that drivers evaluate tasks based on perceived effort, uncertainty, and utility, offering valuable insights for platforms and future research.

众筹不仅仅是金钱:了解运营特征如何影响司机行为
最后一英里配送成本的增加促使全渠道杂货零售商实施众包。众筹是一种基于平台的最后一英里交付模式,它依赖于作为独立承包商的司机来快速接受交付任务。虽然研究通常集中在货币激励的影响上,但我们借鉴了服务运营文献的观点,探讨了三种理论机制(努力效率、不确定性和效用)对货币激励与司机敬业度之间曲线关系的调节作用。具体来说,我们测试了送货密度、送货类型(有人值机与无人值机)和时间如何与金钱激励相互作用,从而影响司机的任务接受反应时间。对美国一家财富100强杂货零售商的众筹平台的约200万份观察数据集进行的计量经济学分析证实,薪酬对任务接受时间的“负面影响正在逐渐减弱”。更重要的是,我们揭示了任务操作特征影响货币激励对任务接受时间的影响。虽然任务密度和无人值机的交付放大了曲线关系,但晚上的任务使其变得平坦,并且比白天安排的任务接受得慢。我们的研究结果表明,驾驶员根据感知的努力程度、不确定性和效用来评估任务,这为平台和未来的研究提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书