Nicolò Masorgo, David D. Dobrzykowski, Christopher S. Tang, Brian S. Fugate
{"title":"There Is More to Crowdshipping Than Money: Understanding How Operational Characteristics Influence Driver Behaviors","authors":"Nicolò Masorgo, David D. Dobrzykowski, Christopher S. Tang, Brian S. Fugate","doi":"10.1002/joom.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The increasing cost of last-mile delivery has motivated omnichannel grocery retailers to implement <i>crowdshipping</i>. Crowdshipping is a platform-based last-mile delivery model that relies on engaging drivers who are independent contractors to quickly accept delivery tasks. While studies often focus on the impact of monetary incentives, we draw on perspectives from the service operations literature to explore the moderating effect of three theoretical mechanisms (effort efficiency, uncertainty, and utility), on the curvilinear relationship between monetary incentives and driver engagement. Specifically, we test how <i>delivery density</i>, <i>delivery type</i> (attended vs. unattended), and <i>time of the day</i> interact with monetary incentives to influence driver's task acceptance response time. Econometric analyses of a dataset comprising about two million observations from a US Fortune 100 grocery retailer's crowdshipping platform confirm the “diminishing negative” effect of remuneration on task acceptance time. More importantly, we reveal that task operational characteristics affect how monetary incentives influence task acceptance time. While task density and unattended deliveries amplify the curvilinear relationship, evening tasks flatten it and are accepted slower than those scheduled in the daytime. Our findings suggest that drivers evaluate tasks based on perceived effort, uncertainty, and utility, offering valuable insights for platforms and future research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 5","pages":"710-729"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The increasing cost of last-mile delivery has motivated omnichannel grocery retailers to implement crowdshipping. Crowdshipping is a platform-based last-mile delivery model that relies on engaging drivers who are independent contractors to quickly accept delivery tasks. While studies often focus on the impact of monetary incentives, we draw on perspectives from the service operations literature to explore the moderating effect of three theoretical mechanisms (effort efficiency, uncertainty, and utility), on the curvilinear relationship between monetary incentives and driver engagement. Specifically, we test how delivery density, delivery type (attended vs. unattended), and time of the day interact with monetary incentives to influence driver's task acceptance response time. Econometric analyses of a dataset comprising about two million observations from a US Fortune 100 grocery retailer's crowdshipping platform confirm the “diminishing negative” effect of remuneration on task acceptance time. More importantly, we reveal that task operational characteristics affect how monetary incentives influence task acceptance time. While task density and unattended deliveries amplify the curvilinear relationship, evening tasks flatten it and are accepted slower than those scheduled in the daytime. Our findings suggest that drivers evaluate tasks based on perceived effort, uncertainty, and utility, offering valuable insights for platforms and future research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement.
JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough.
Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification.
JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.