Surgical Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis in Elderly Patients Aged ≥ 80: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Survey in Japan With Propensity Score Matching

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery Pub Date : 2026-07-02 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1002/ags3.70213
Kiichi Sugimoto, Akio Saiura, Shuko Nojiri, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Goro Honda, Kazushige Kawai, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Keiichi Takahashi
{"title":"Surgical Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis in Elderly Patients Aged ≥ 80: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Survey in Japan With Propensity Score Matching","authors":"Kiichi Sugimoto,&nbsp;Akio Saiura,&nbsp;Shuko Nojiri,&nbsp;Hirotoshi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Goro Honda,&nbsp;Kazushige Kawai,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Hasegawa,&nbsp;Keiichi Takahashi","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>As the aging of the global population increases, the number of elderly patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is expected to increase. The aim of this study was to clarify the long-term oncological outcomes and treatment of CRLM in elderly patients aged ≥ 80.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with CRLM were identified from the Japanese database of Liver Metastases Survey of Colorectal Cancer, collected from 145 centers. Two thousand four hundred nine patients with liver resection were eligible for analysis. This cohort was divided into two groups aged &lt; 80 (group Y (younger); <i>n</i> = 2194) and ≥ 80 (group E (elderly); <i>n</i> = 215). We compared the long-term outcomes after liver resection of patients with CRLM aged ≥ 80 and &lt; 80 years after adjustment using propensity score matching (PSM), and we identified the reasons for differences in these outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After PSM, group E showed a comparable recurrence-free survival to that in group Y (hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, <i>p</i> = 0.16). However, group E had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 1.77, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.80, <i>p</i> = 0.0004). Treatment for recurrence was given at a significantly lower rate in group E (80/130 (61.5%) vs. 1148/1329 (86.4%), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Surgical resection seems to be as effective in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 as in nonelderly patients. The significantly worse CSS and OS may have resulted from a lower rate of treatment for recurrence in elderly patients aged ≥ 80. Physicians should keep this finding in mind with regard to limitations of treatments for recurrence after initial liver resection in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 with CRLM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"10 4","pages":"1107-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70213","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.70213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

As the aging of the global population increases, the number of elderly patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is expected to increase. The aim of this study was to clarify the long-term oncological outcomes and treatment of CRLM in elderly patients aged ≥ 80.

Methods

Patients with CRLM were identified from the Japanese database of Liver Metastases Survey of Colorectal Cancer, collected from 145 centers. Two thousand four hundred nine patients with liver resection were eligible for analysis. This cohort was divided into two groups aged < 80 (group Y (younger); n = 2194) and ≥ 80 (group E (elderly); n = 215). We compared the long-term outcomes after liver resection of patients with CRLM aged ≥ 80 and < 80 years after adjustment using propensity score matching (PSM), and we identified the reasons for differences in these outcomes.

Results

After PSM, group E showed a comparable recurrence-free survival to that in group Y (hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, p = 0.16). However, group E had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 1.77, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.80, p = 0.0004). Treatment for recurrence was given at a significantly lower rate in group E (80/130 (61.5%) vs. 1148/1329 (86.4%), p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Surgical resection seems to be as effective in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 as in nonelderly patients. The significantly worse CSS and OS may have resulted from a lower rate of treatment for recurrence in elderly patients aged ≥ 80. Physicians should keep this finding in mind with regard to limitations of treatments for recurrence after initial liver resection in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 with CRLM.

Abstract Image

≥80岁老年患者手术切除结直肠肝转移:日本一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性全国队列调查
随着全球人口老龄化的加剧,老年结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者的数量有望增加。本研究的目的是阐明≥80岁老年患者CRLM的长期肿瘤预后和治疗。方法从日本145个中心收集的结直肠癌肝转移调查数据库中确定CRLM患者。2449例肝切除术患者符合分析条件。该队列分为两组,年龄80岁(Y组,较年轻);n = 2194),≥80 (E组,老年人);n = 215)。我们使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较≥80岁和≥80岁的CRLM患者肝切除术后的长期结果,并确定这些结果差异的原因。结果经PSM治疗后,E组无复发生存率与Y组相当(HR: 1.20, p = 0.16)。然而,E组的癌症特异性生存(CSS) (HR: 1.77, p = 0.002)和总生存(OS) (HR: 1.80, p = 0.0004)明显较差。E组的复发率明显低于对照组(80/130 (61.5%)vs. 1148/1329 (86.4%), p < 0.0001)。结论≥80岁的老年患者与非老年患者手术切除效果相同。CSS和OS的显著恶化可能是由于≥80岁的老年患者的复发率较低。对于年龄≥80岁的老年CRLM患者初始肝切除术后复发治疗的局限性,医生应牢记这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书