Revisiting the Four Stages of Creativity: The Role of Metacognition

IF 4.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Jeb S. Puryear, Kamila Urban, Marek Urban
{"title":"Revisiting the Four Stages of Creativity: The Role of Metacognition","authors":"Jeb S. Puryear,&nbsp;Kamila Urban,&nbsp;Marek Urban","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Wallas' four-stage model has long served as a heuristic for understanding creativity, but contemporary metacognitive theory clarifies the mechanisms within each stage. This article reconceptualizes the model through the lens of metacognition, focusing on the role of knowledge, regulation, and experiences. In the Preparation stage, declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge guide planning and problem representation. In the Incubation stage, stepping back from effortful processing while remaining open to associations represents a regulatory decision. In the Illumination stage, the sudden “Aha!” moment is best understood as a metacognitive experience that flags a candidate solution and signals further regulation. In the Verification stage, ideas are judged against internalized standards through monitoring, with subsequent regulatory decisions determining whether ideas are pursued, adapted, or discarded. Across stages, transitions are emphasized, and creativity is framed as a dynamic, self-regulatory system. Revisiting Wallas' model in this way highlights that each stage involves distinct forms of knowledge, monitoring, and regulation, offering a more precise account of processes underlying his framework. This perspective yields testable hypotheses about stage-specific regulation and points to interventions, such as explicit instruction and metacognitive feedback, that can strengthen creativity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wallas' four-stage model has long served as a heuristic for understanding creativity, but contemporary metacognitive theory clarifies the mechanisms within each stage. This article reconceptualizes the model through the lens of metacognition, focusing on the role of knowledge, regulation, and experiences. In the Preparation stage, declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge guide planning and problem representation. In the Incubation stage, stepping back from effortful processing while remaining open to associations represents a regulatory decision. In the Illumination stage, the sudden “Aha!” moment is best understood as a metacognitive experience that flags a candidate solution and signals further regulation. In the Verification stage, ideas are judged against internalized standards through monitoring, with subsequent regulatory decisions determining whether ideas are pursued, adapted, or discarded. Across stages, transitions are emphasized, and creativity is framed as a dynamic, self-regulatory system. Revisiting Wallas' model in this way highlights that each stage involves distinct forms of knowledge, monitoring, and regulation, offering a more precise account of processes underlying his framework. This perspective yields testable hypotheses about stage-specific regulation and points to interventions, such as explicit instruction and metacognitive feedback, that can strengthen creativity.

重新审视创造力的四个阶段:元认知的作用
Wallas的四阶段模型长期以来一直是理解创造力的启发式模型,但当代元认知理论澄清了每个阶段内的机制。本文通过元认知的视角重新定义了该模型,重点关注知识、调节和经验的作用。在准备阶段,陈述性、程序性和条件性知识指导计划和问题表示。在孵化阶段,从费力的处理中退一步,同时保持对协会的开放,代表着一种监管决定。在照明阶段,突然的“啊哈!”时刻最好被理解为一种元认知体验,它标志着一个候选解决方案,并发出进一步调节的信号。在验证阶段,通过监控,根据内部化的标准来判断想法,随后的监管决定决定是否追求、适应或丢弃想法。在各个阶段,强调过渡,并将创造力框架为一个动态的,自我调节的系统。以这种方式重新审视Wallas的模型,强调每个阶段都涉及不同形式的知识、监控和监管,从而提供了对其框架下的过程的更精确描述。这一观点提出了关于特定阶段调节的可测试假设,并指出了可以加强创造力的干预措施,如明确指导和元认知反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书