Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Yongseong Lee, Youngju Lee, Dongha Lee
{"title":"Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.","authors":"Yongseong Lee, Youngju Lee, Dongha Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00426-026-02340-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion is typically perceived in dynamic multisensory contexts. Although previous studies have demonstrated multimodal gains in audiovisual recognition (i.e., general enhancement in audiovisual conditions), they have not clarified how visual and auditory information contribute to affective judgments or whether their contribution differs by emotion categories. The current study investigated how emotion perception varies across modalities and examined whether these variations depend on emotion categories. We conducted an emotion perception experiment using audio-only (AO), video-only (VO), and audio-visual (AV) speech stimuli. Participants evaluated the valence (positive/negative) and arousal (weak/strong) of stimuli depicting seven emotions (angry, calm, disgust, fearful, happy, sad, and surprise). Overall, AO stimuli tended to be perceived as more negative in valence and weaker in arousal compared to VO or AV stimuli. In representational similarity analysis, the response patterns for AV were more similar to VO than to AO. Happy and disgust stimuli were rated as weaker in arousal and less positive or less negative in valence in AO condition than in other conditions. For surprise, VO stimuli were rated more negatively than AO and AV. However, angry, fearful, and sad emotions did not differ between modalities. These findings indicate that affective judgments are not solely driven by general enhancement from combined audiovisual cues; rather, the relative importance of sensory modalities varies by emotion, suggesting that specific unimodal cues can be as informative as multimodal information. These modality-specific contributions to emotion perception have implications for clinical assessment, social communication, and affective neuroscience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"90 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13328220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-026-02340-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion is typically perceived in dynamic multisensory contexts. Although previous studies have demonstrated multimodal gains in audiovisual recognition (i.e., general enhancement in audiovisual conditions), they have not clarified how visual and auditory information contribute to affective judgments or whether their contribution differs by emotion categories. The current study investigated how emotion perception varies across modalities and examined whether these variations depend on emotion categories. We conducted an emotion perception experiment using audio-only (AO), video-only (VO), and audio-visual (AV) speech stimuli. Participants evaluated the valence (positive/negative) and arousal (weak/strong) of stimuli depicting seven emotions (angry, calm, disgust, fearful, happy, sad, and surprise). Overall, AO stimuli tended to be perceived as more negative in valence and weaker in arousal compared to VO or AV stimuli. In representational similarity analysis, the response patterns for AV were more similar to VO than to AO. Happy and disgust stimuli were rated as weaker in arousal and less positive or less negative in valence in AO condition than in other conditions. For surprise, VO stimuli were rated more negatively than AO and AV. However, angry, fearful, and sad emotions did not differ between modalities. These findings indicate that affective judgments are not solely driven by general enhancement from combined audiovisual cues; rather, the relative importance of sensory modalities varies by emotion, suggesting that specific unimodal cues can be as informative as multimodal information. These modality-specific contributions to emotion perception have implications for clinical assessment, social communication, and affective neuroscience.

情绪特异性情态在情绪听觉和视觉知觉中的作用。
情绪通常在动态的多感官环境中被感知。虽然以前的研究已经证明了视听识别的多模态增益(即视听条件的普遍增强),但他们并没有阐明视觉和听觉信息如何促进情感判断,或者它们的贡献是否因情感类别而异。目前的研究调查了情绪感知如何在不同的模式下变化,并检查了这些变化是否取决于情绪类别。我们使用纯音频(AO)、纯视频(VO)和视听(AV)语音刺激进行了情绪感知实验。参与者评估了描述七种情绪(愤怒、平静、厌恶、恐惧、快乐、悲伤和惊讶)的刺激的效价(积极/消极)和唤醒(弱/强)。总的来说,与VO或AV刺激相比,AO刺激倾向于被认为在效价上更负,在唤醒上更弱。在代表性相似性分析中,AV的响应模式更接近VO而不是AO。与其他条件相比,AO条件下的快乐和厌恶刺激的唤醒程度较弱,效价的积极或消极程度较低。令人惊讶的是,VO刺激比AO和AV更负面。然而,愤怒、恐惧和悲伤的情绪在不同的模式之间没有差异。这些发现表明,情感判断并不仅仅是由综合视听线索的一般增强所驱动的;相反,感觉模态的相对重要性因情绪而异,这表明特定的单模态线索可以像多模态信息一样提供信息。这些特定模式对情绪感知的贡献对临床评估、社会沟通和情感神经科学都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书