Is Smartphone-Based 3D Photogrammetry Suitable for Indirect Facial Analysis in Patients With Dentofacial Deformities? A Trueness and Precision Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Allan Vinícius Martins-de-Barros, André Corsino Fonseca Neto, Maria Eduarda de Alencar Barreto, Petra de Melo Lacerda, Gilberto Tenório Wanderley Fernandes Lima, José Rodrigues Laureano Filho, Tatiane Fonseca Faro, Fábio Andrey da Costa Araújo
{"title":"Is Smartphone-Based 3D Photogrammetry Suitable for Indirect Facial Analysis in Patients With Dentofacial Deformities? A Trueness and Precision Analysis.","authors":"Allan Vinícius Martins-de-Barros, André Corsino Fonseca Neto, Maria Eduarda de Alencar Barreto, Petra de Melo Lacerda, Gilberto Tenório Wanderley Fernandes Lima, José Rodrigues Laureano Filho, Tatiane Fonseca Faro, Fábio Andrey da Costa Araújo","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the trueness and precision of Qlone Dental Pro 3D Scanner for smartphones when applied to indirect facial analysis of individuals undergoing orthognathic surgical planning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional trueness and precision study. The study population comprised individuals with dentofacial deformities. A control group without dentofacial deformity was included for comparison. Direct facial anthropometry using a digital calliper served as standard-reference. 3D facial models in. OBJ format were obtained by Qlone Dental Pro 3D Scanner and imported to MeshLab 2025.7 where indirect facial measurements were performed. Trueness was defined by the proximity of indirect and direct facial measurements, while precision was assessed through comparison of indirect measurements from two subsequent smartphone-based scans. Statistical analysis was performed with Jamovi 2.6.26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 40 participants, equally distributed between dentofacial deformity and control groups. In trueness analysis, mean differences ranged from -3.32 mm to 0.83 mm, with an overall mean difference of -1.47 mm. Systematic bias was statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all measurements, except for N-Sn. Precision analysis demonstrated mean differences < 0.40 mm, with an overall mean difference of 0.14 mm, without statistically significant systematic bias (p > 0.05). Comparison of trueness and precision between individuals with and without dentofacial deformities revealed no statistically significant differences for most measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indirect facial anthropometric analysis using Qlone Dental Pro 3D Scanner demonstrated high precision but limited trueness compared with conventional direct measurements. The presence of dentofacial deformity did not significantly influence indirect measurement performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the trueness and precision of Qlone Dental Pro 3D Scanner for smartphones when applied to indirect facial analysis of individuals undergoing orthognathic surgical planning.

Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional trueness and precision study. The study population comprised individuals with dentofacial deformities. A control group without dentofacial deformity was included for comparison. Direct facial anthropometry using a digital calliper served as standard-reference. 3D facial models in. OBJ format were obtained by Qlone Dental Pro 3D Scanner and imported to MeshLab 2025.7 where indirect facial measurements were performed. Trueness was defined by the proximity of indirect and direct facial measurements, while precision was assessed through comparison of indirect measurements from two subsequent smartphone-based scans. Statistical analysis was performed with Jamovi 2.6.26.0.

Results: The study included 40 participants, equally distributed between dentofacial deformity and control groups. In trueness analysis, mean differences ranged from -3.32 mm to 0.83 mm, with an overall mean difference of -1.47 mm. Systematic bias was statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all measurements, except for N-Sn. Precision analysis demonstrated mean differences < 0.40 mm, with an overall mean difference of 0.14 mm, without statistically significant systematic bias (p > 0.05). Comparison of trueness and precision between individuals with and without dentofacial deformities revealed no statistically significant differences for most measurements.

Conclusion: Indirect facial anthropometric analysis using Qlone Dental Pro 3D Scanner demonstrated high precision but limited trueness compared with conventional direct measurements. The presence of dentofacial deformity did not significantly influence indirect measurement performance.

基于智能手机的3D摄影测量是否适用于牙面畸形患者的间接面部分析?真实性和精确性分析。
目的:评价Qlone Dental Pro智能手机3D扫描仪用于正颌手术计划患者间接面部分析的准确性和准确性。材料与方法:本研究为横断面真实性与精密度研究。研究人群包括有牙面畸形的个体。另设无牙面畸形的对照组进行比较。使用数字卡尺进行直接面部人体测量,作为标准参考。3D面部模型。通过Qlone Dental Pro 3D扫描仪获得OBJ格式,并导入MeshLab 2015.7进行间接面部测量。准确性是通过间接和直接面部测量的接近度来定义的,而准确性是通过比较随后两次基于智能手机的扫描的间接测量来评估的。采用Jamovi 2.6.26.0进行统计分析。结果:本研究共纳入40名参与者,平均分布于牙面畸形组和对照组。在真实度分析中,平均差异范围为-3.32 mm ~ 0.83 mm,总体平均差异为-1.47 mm。系统偏倚有统计学意义(p 0.05)。有牙面畸形和没有牙面畸形的个体之间的准确性和准确性比较显示,大多数测量结果没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:Qlone Dental Pro 3D扫描仪与传统的直接测量相比,间接的面部人体测量具有较高的精度,但准确性有限。牙面畸形的存在对间接测量结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书