Surgical management of parapharyngeal vagal schwannomas: a systematic review and practical considerations for approach selection.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Francesco Chiari, Carlo Carosi, Matteo Fermi, Livio Presutti, Giuseppe Mercante, Giovanni Motta, Claudio Donadio Caporale, Pierre Guarino
{"title":"Surgical management of parapharyngeal vagal schwannomas: a systematic review and practical considerations for approach selection.","authors":"Francesco Chiari, Carlo Carosi, Matteo Fermi, Livio Presutti, Giuseppe Mercante, Giovanni Motta, Claudio Donadio Caporale, Pierre Guarino","doi":"10.1017/S0022215126105325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vagal schwannomas of the parapharyngeal space are rare benign tumours and the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study aimed to identify clinical and tumour-related factors associated with different surgical strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses ('PRISMA') 2020 guidelines. Studies published between January 1997 and March 2026 were identified, and analyses were restricted to surgically treated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies including 87 patients were analysed. The transcervical approach was most frequently used, followed by transoral and combined approaches. Tumour size was not associated with surgical approach selection. Pre-operative hoarseness and oropharyngeal bulging were more common in transoral cases, whereas cervical mass predominated in transcervical and combined approaches. Overall, complications were infrequent and recurrence was rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selection of the surgical approach appeared to be influenced by anatomical considerations rather than tumour size. These findings describe contemporary surgical decision-making patterns without demonstrating superiority between approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"954-962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215126105325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vagal schwannomas of the parapharyngeal space are rare benign tumours and the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study aimed to identify clinical and tumour-related factors associated with different surgical strategies.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses ('PRISMA') 2020 guidelines. Studies published between January 1997 and March 2026 were identified, and analyses were restricted to surgically treated patients.

Results: Twenty-five studies including 87 patients were analysed. The transcervical approach was most frequently used, followed by transoral and combined approaches. Tumour size was not associated with surgical approach selection. Pre-operative hoarseness and oropharyngeal bulging were more common in transoral cases, whereas cervical mass predominated in transcervical and combined approaches. Overall, complications were infrequent and recurrence was rare.

Conclusion: Selection of the surgical approach appeared to be influenced by anatomical considerations rather than tumour size. These findings describe contemporary surgical decision-making patterns without demonstrating superiority between approaches.

咽旁迷走神经鞘瘤的外科治疗:系统回顾和入路选择的实际考虑。
目的:咽旁间隙迷走神经鞘瘤是一种罕见的良性肿瘤,其最佳手术入路一直存在争议。本研究旨在确定与不同手术策略相关的临床和肿瘤相关因素。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(“PRISMA”)2020指南进行系统评价。1997年1月至2026年3月期间发表的研究被确定,分析仅限于手术治疗的患者。结果:共分析25项研究87例患者。经颈入路最为常用,其次为经口入路和联合入路。肿瘤大小与手术入路选择无关。术前声音嘶哑和口咽膨出在经口病例中更为常见,而宫颈肿块在经颈和联合入路中占主导地位。总的来说,并发症很少,复发也很少见。结论:手术入路的选择似乎受解剖学因素而非肿瘤大小的影响。这些发现描述了当代手术决策模式,但没有证明不同手术方式之间的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Laryngology and Otology
Journal of Laryngology and Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (JLO) is a leading, monthly journal containing original scientific articles and clinical records in otology, rhinology, laryngology and related specialties. Founded in 1887, JLO is absorbing reading for ENT specialists and trainees. The journal has an international outlook with contributions from around the world, relevant to all specialists in this area regardless of the country in which they practise. JLO contains main articles (original, review and historical), case reports and short reports as well as radiology, pathology or oncology in focus, a selection of abstracts, book reviews, letters to the editor, general notes and calendar, operative surgery techniques, and occasional supplements. It is fully illustrated and has become a definitive reference source in this fast-moving subject area. Published monthly an annual subscription is excellent value for money. Included in the subscription is access to the JLO interactive web site with searchable abstract database of the journal archive back to 1887.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书