Knowledge Gaps and Nonadherence Among Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Mitsutoshi Toda, Kazuma Iekushi, Yuri Takahashi, Shun Kohsaka
{"title":"Knowledge Gaps and Nonadherence Among Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Mitsutoshi Toda, Kazuma Iekushi, Yuri Takahashi, Shun Kohsaka","doi":"10.5551/jat.66074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) includes both oral (e.g., statins) and injectable agents. However, patient awareness of LDL-C management and adherence to it remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed 415 Japanese patients with ASCVD using a web-based platform. The participants reported their understanding of LDL-C target values and the effects of LLT. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Extent of Nonadherence scale, and a binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 58.1%-60.2% of the participants reported confidence in knowing their correct lipid target values and managing dyslipidemia appropriately. However, only 22.2% reported LDL-C targets of <50 or <70 mg/dL, and 43.4% believed their targets to be <50, <70, or <100 mg/dL. In contrast, 56.7% either reported LDL-C targets of <120, <140, or <160 mg/dL or did not know their targets. Regarding LLT, 65.8% were unaware that extreme lowering of LDL-C levels with LLT had no disadvantages, and 74.2% were unaware that injectable LLTs were available. Overall, 39.0% of the participants were nonadherent. Higher out-of-pocket costs (≥ 3,001 yen; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.83, p = 0.024) and experience with self-injections (adjusted odds ratio: 2.34, p = 0.027) were significantly associated with nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight a considerable gap in patient knowledge and adherence to dyslipidemia management strategies. Interventions that promote patient education and shared decision-making are essential for improving adherence and achieving optimal LDL-C targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.66074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) includes both oral (e.g., statins) and injectable agents. However, patient awareness of LDL-C management and adherence to it remain uncertain.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 415 Japanese patients with ASCVD using a web-based platform. The participants reported their understanding of LDL-C target values and the effects of LLT. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Extent of Nonadherence scale, and a binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with nonadherence.

Results: Approximately 58.1%-60.2% of the participants reported confidence in knowing their correct lipid target values and managing dyslipidemia appropriately. However, only 22.2% reported LDL-C targets of <50 or <70 mg/dL, and 43.4% believed their targets to be <50, <70, or <100 mg/dL. In contrast, 56.7% either reported LDL-C targets of <120, <140, or <160 mg/dL or did not know their targets. Regarding LLT, 65.8% were unaware that extreme lowering of LDL-C levels with LLT had no disadvantages, and 74.2% were unaware that injectable LLTs were available. Overall, 39.0% of the participants were nonadherent. Higher out-of-pocket costs (≥ 3,001 yen; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.83, p = 0.024) and experience with self-injections (adjusted odds ratio: 2.34, p = 0.027) were significantly associated with nonadherence.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight a considerable gap in patient knowledge and adherence to dyslipidemia management strategies. Interventions that promote patient education and shared decision-making are essential for improving adherence and achieving optimal LDL-C targets.

日本动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的知识缺口和不依从
目的:降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平对于预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)至关重要。推荐的降脂疗法(LLT)包括口服(如他汀类药物)和注射药物。然而,患者对LDL-C管理的认识和依从性仍然不确定。方法:本横断面研究使用基于网络的平台调查了415名日本ASCVD患者。参与者报告了他们对LDL-C目标值和LLT效果的理解。使用不依从程度量表评估药物依从性,并进行二项逻辑回归分析以确定与不依从性相关的因素。结果:大约58.1%-60.2%的参与者报告有信心知道他们正确的脂质目标值并适当地管理血脂异常。然而,只有22.2%的人报告LDL-C目标<50或<70 mg/dL, 43.4%的人认为他们的目标<50、<70或<100 mg/dL。相比之下,56.7%的人报告LDL-C目标为<120、<140或<160 mg/dL,或者不知道他们的目标。关于LLT, 65.8%的人不知道LLT极端降低LDL-C水平没有缺点,74.2%的人不知道可注射LLT。总体而言,39.0%的参与者不坚持。较高的自付费用(≥3,001日元;调整后的优势比[OR]: 1.83, p = 0.024)和自我注射经验(调整后的优势比:2.34,p = 0.027)与不依从性显著相关。结论:我们的研究结果强调了在患者知识和对血脂异常管理策略的依从性方面存在相当大的差距。促进患者教育和共同决策的干预措施对于改善依从性和实现最佳LDL-C目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
271
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: JAT publishes articles focused on all aspects of research on atherosclerosis, vascular biology, thrombosis, lipid and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书