{"title":"Knowledge Gaps and Nonadherence Among Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Mitsutoshi Toda, Kazuma Iekushi, Yuri Takahashi, Shun Kohsaka","doi":"10.5551/jat.66074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) includes both oral (e.g., statins) and injectable agents. However, patient awareness of LDL-C management and adherence to it remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed 415 Japanese patients with ASCVD using a web-based platform. The participants reported their understanding of LDL-C target values and the effects of LLT. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Extent of Nonadherence scale, and a binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 58.1%-60.2% of the participants reported confidence in knowing their correct lipid target values and managing dyslipidemia appropriately. However, only 22.2% reported LDL-C targets of <50 or <70 mg/dL, and 43.4% believed their targets to be <50, <70, or <100 mg/dL. In contrast, 56.7% either reported LDL-C targets of <120, <140, or <160 mg/dL or did not know their targets. Regarding LLT, 65.8% were unaware that extreme lowering of LDL-C levels with LLT had no disadvantages, and 74.2% were unaware that injectable LLTs were available. Overall, 39.0% of the participants were nonadherent. Higher out-of-pocket costs (≥ 3,001 yen; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.83, p = 0.024) and experience with self-injections (adjusted odds ratio: 2.34, p = 0.027) were significantly associated with nonadherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight a considerable gap in patient knowledge and adherence to dyslipidemia management strategies. Interventions that promote patient education and shared decision-making are essential for improving adherence and achieving optimal LDL-C targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.66074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) includes both oral (e.g., statins) and injectable agents. However, patient awareness of LDL-C management and adherence to it remain uncertain.
Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 415 Japanese patients with ASCVD using a web-based platform. The participants reported their understanding of LDL-C target values and the effects of LLT. Medication adherence was evaluated using the Extent of Nonadherence scale, and a binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with nonadherence.
Results: Approximately 58.1%-60.2% of the participants reported confidence in knowing their correct lipid target values and managing dyslipidemia appropriately. However, only 22.2% reported LDL-C targets of <50 or <70 mg/dL, and 43.4% believed their targets to be <50, <70, or <100 mg/dL. In contrast, 56.7% either reported LDL-C targets of <120, <140, or <160 mg/dL or did not know their targets. Regarding LLT, 65.8% were unaware that extreme lowering of LDL-C levels with LLT had no disadvantages, and 74.2% were unaware that injectable LLTs were available. Overall, 39.0% of the participants were nonadherent. Higher out-of-pocket costs (≥ 3,001 yen; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.83, p = 0.024) and experience with self-injections (adjusted odds ratio: 2.34, p = 0.027) were significantly associated with nonadherence.
Conclusions: Our findings highlight a considerable gap in patient knowledge and adherence to dyslipidemia management strategies. Interventions that promote patient education and shared decision-making are essential for improving adherence and achieving optimal LDL-C targets.