{"title":"Novel Data on Left Atrial Strain by Echocardiography in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.","authors":"Sara Afshar, Reza Khademi, Amirhossein Mirzaei, Hoorak Poorzand, Maryam Karimi Teymouri, Vafa Baradaran Rahimi","doi":"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_157_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study confronts the diagnostic challenge of identifying diastolic heart failure (HF) in patients with normal systolic function in the early stages of HF.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study evaluated patients with HF symptoms, excluding those with evidence of increased ventricular filling pressure. All patients underwent stress echocardiography and were categorized into two groups: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) and those with normal left ventricle filling pressure. Echocardiography measured left atrial (LA) strain in three phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 64 patients, 47 exhibited Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction (DD), and 17 had Grade 2 dysfunction (HFpEF). Echocardiographic factors, including the peak jet velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) exercise, A during rest, E/E' during rest and exercise, LA volume, LA volume index, LA vol index/S1 + S2 + S3, LA vol index/Strain 1, and LA stiffness (E/E'/Strain 1) were significantly lower in Grade 1 diastolic HF than in Grade 2 patients. In contrast, E during rest and exercise, E' during exercise, Strain 1, Strain 2, Strain 3, S1 + S2 + S3, and LVEDD/body surface area were significantly higher in Grade 1 diastolic HF than in Grade 2 patients. In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, LA vol index/S1 + S2 + S3, LA vol index/S1, Strain 1, S1 + S2 + S3, and E/E'/Strain 1 showed the potential clinical applicability in diagnosing diastolic HF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alterations in atrial strain could potentially serve as an early indicator for diagnosing DD. Atrial stiffness with a cutoff of 1.25 can distinguish Grade 2 HF from Grade 1 with high sensitivity and specificity. However, more investigations in this field are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","volume":"36 2","pages":"164-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13322576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_157_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study confronts the diagnostic challenge of identifying diastolic heart failure (HF) in patients with normal systolic function in the early stages of HF.
Materials and methods: The study evaluated patients with HF symptoms, excluding those with evidence of increased ventricular filling pressure. All patients underwent stress echocardiography and were categorized into two groups: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) and those with normal left ventricle filling pressure. Echocardiography measured left atrial (LA) strain in three phases.
Results: Among the 64 patients, 47 exhibited Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction (DD), and 17 had Grade 2 dysfunction (HFpEF). Echocardiographic factors, including the peak jet velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) exercise, A during rest, E/E' during rest and exercise, LA volume, LA volume index, LA vol index/S1 + S2 + S3, LA vol index/Strain 1, and LA stiffness (E/E'/Strain 1) were significantly lower in Grade 1 diastolic HF than in Grade 2 patients. In contrast, E during rest and exercise, E' during exercise, Strain 1, Strain 2, Strain 3, S1 + S2 + S3, and LVEDD/body surface area were significantly higher in Grade 1 diastolic HF than in Grade 2 patients. In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, LA vol index/S1 + S2 + S3, LA vol index/S1, Strain 1, S1 + S2 + S3, and E/E'/Strain 1 showed the potential clinical applicability in diagnosing diastolic HF.
Conclusion: Alterations in atrial strain could potentially serve as an early indicator for diagnosing DD. Atrial stiffness with a cutoff of 1.25 can distinguish Grade 2 HF from Grade 1 with high sensitivity and specificity. However, more investigations in this field are warranted.