The true fate of the 2-stage revision arthroplasty for hip and knee prosthetic joint infection.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Victor R Carlson, Carl L Herndon, Rory W Metcalf, Taylor M Rowe, Kayla T Hietpas, Thomas K Fehring, Jesse E Otero
{"title":"The true fate of the 2-stage revision arthroplasty for hip and knee prosthetic joint infection.","authors":"Victor R Carlson, Carl L Herndon, Rory W Metcalf, Taylor M Rowe, Kayla T Hietpas, Thomas K Fehring, Jesse E Otero","doi":"10.1177/11207000261454934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>2-stage revision arthroplasty remains the current gold standard for treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee in the United States. Rates of infection eradication have been shown to vary from 60% to 91%. The purpose of this study was to determine the true fate the of 2-stage exchange protocol for PJI using an updated classification system for PJI treatment outcomes as well as the effect of systemic host and local extremity grades on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a PJI registry was performed from a single institution from January 2010 through December 2021. All patients having undergone a planned 2-stage exchange after primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for chronic PJI defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were included. Perioperative variables and tiered outcome at final follow up were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 589 cases (561 patients) met final inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 394 cases (66.9%) retained their implants at median follow-up of 3.7 years (IQR 1.8, 7.7). 311 cases (52.8%) underwent successful two-stage revision with prosthesis retention without ongoing use of suppressive antibiotics, while another 83 cases (14.1%) retained their prosthesis with use of suppressive antibiotics. 152 cases (25.8%) underwent subsequent septic or aseptic revision, amputation, arthrodesis, spacer retention while 40 (6.8%) died during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 3.7 years after surgery, 66.9% of 2-stage exchanges for PJI resulted in retained prosthesis with or without use of suppressive antibiotics. The remaining 33.1% of this population underwent additional surgery (25.8%), or were deceased (6.8%).</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000261454934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000261454934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 2-stage revision arthroplasty remains the current gold standard for treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee in the United States. Rates of infection eradication have been shown to vary from 60% to 91%. The purpose of this study was to determine the true fate the of 2-stage exchange protocol for PJI using an updated classification system for PJI treatment outcomes as well as the effect of systemic host and local extremity grades on outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of a PJI registry was performed from a single institution from January 2010 through December 2021. All patients having undergone a planned 2-stage exchange after primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for chronic PJI defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were included. Perioperative variables and tiered outcome at final follow up were collected.

Results: In total, 589 cases (561 patients) met final inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 394 cases (66.9%) retained their implants at median follow-up of 3.7 years (IQR 1.8, 7.7). 311 cases (52.8%) underwent successful two-stage revision with prosthesis retention without ongoing use of suppressive antibiotics, while another 83 cases (14.1%) retained their prosthesis with use of suppressive antibiotics. 152 cases (25.8%) underwent subsequent septic or aseptic revision, amputation, arthrodesis, spacer retention while 40 (6.8%) died during the study period.

Conclusions: At 3.7 years after surgery, 66.9% of 2-stage exchanges for PJI resulted in retained prosthesis with or without use of suppressive antibiotics. The remaining 33.1% of this population underwent additional surgery (25.8%), or were deceased (6.8%).

髋关节和膝关节假体感染的2期翻修置换术的真正命运。
背景:在美国,2期翻修关节置换术仍然是目前治疗髋关节和膝关节慢性假体周围关节感染(PJI)的金标准。感染根除率从60%到91%不等。本研究的目的是通过更新的PJI治疗结果分类系统,以及系统宿主和局部肢体分级对结果的影响,确定PJI两阶段交换方案的真实命运。方法:从2010年1月到2021年12月,对一家机构的PJI登记进行回顾性审查。所有根据肌肉骨骼感染学会(Musculoskeletal Infection Society)标准诊断的慢性PJI患者,均在原发性或翻修性全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)后接受了计划的2期置换。收集围手术期变量和最终随访时的分级结果。结果:589例(561例)患者符合最终纳入标准,纳入分析。394例(66.9%)患者在中位随访3.7年(IQR 1.8, 7.7)保留种植体。311例(52.8%)成功进行了两期修复,假体保留,未持续使用抑制性抗生素,另有83例(14.1%)使用抑制性抗生素保留假体。152例(25.8%)接受了脓毒性或无菌性翻修、截肢、关节融合术、垫片保留,40例(6.8%)在研究期间死亡。结论:术后3.7年,66.9%的2期PJI置换患者在使用或不使用抑制性抗生素的情况下保留假体。其余33.1%的患者接受了额外的手术(25.8%)或死亡(6.8%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书