Comparative performance of the risk analysis index versus traditional frailty measures in predicting outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty for mechanical prosthetic complications.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
HIP International Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1177/11207000261458685
Cameron J Sabet, Bhav Jain, Jad Lawand, Bill Young, Dang Nguyen, Bara M Hammadeh, Mohammad D Alfawareh
{"title":"Comparative performance of the risk analysis index versus traditional frailty measures in predicting outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty for mechanical prosthetic complications.","authors":"Cameron J Sabet, Bhav Jain, Jad Lawand, Bill Young, Dang Nguyen, Bara M Hammadeh, Mohammad D Alfawareh","doi":"10.1177/11207000261458685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty assessment has become increasingly important in predicting surgical outcomes, particularly in complex revision procedures. Among patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) for mechanical prosthetic complications, optimal frailty stratification remains poorly defined. This study compared the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) in predicting postoperative outcomes within this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 5631 adult patients undergoing rTHA for mechanical prosthetic complications using data from the 2015-2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Frailty was assessed using RAI and mFI-5, calculated via published algorithms. Primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality and non-home discharge. Secondary outcomes included major complications, minor complications, unplanned readmission, reoperation, and extended length of stay (LOS >4 days). Discriminative performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) analysis, with bootstrap resampling (100 iterations) for internal validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean patient age was 66.80 ± 11.57 years with 57.61% female. Overall, 30-day mortality was 0.4% with major complications occurring in 2.4%. RAI demonstrated superior discrimination for mortality (AUC 0.822) compared to mFI-5 (0.688, <i>p</i> < 0.001). For non-home discharge, RAI achieved AUC 0.735 versus mFI-5 0.607 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). RAI showed strong performance for extended length of stay (AUC 0.624) and minor complications (AUC 0.652), significantly outperforming mFI-5 across multiple outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Risk Analysis Index significantly outperforms the mFI-5 across key outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty for mechanical prosthetic complications. Its multidomain structure, which captures age, functional dependence, comorbidities, and acute physiological stress, makes it a superior tool for surgical risk stratification, discharge planning, and identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from targeted perioperative optimisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"826-833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000261458685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty assessment has become increasingly important in predicting surgical outcomes, particularly in complex revision procedures. Among patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) for mechanical prosthetic complications, optimal frailty stratification remains poorly defined. This study compared the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) in predicting postoperative outcomes within this high-risk population.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 5631 adult patients undergoing rTHA for mechanical prosthetic complications using data from the 2015-2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Frailty was assessed using RAI and mFI-5, calculated via published algorithms. Primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality and non-home discharge. Secondary outcomes included major complications, minor complications, unplanned readmission, reoperation, and extended length of stay (LOS >4 days). Discriminative performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) analysis, with bootstrap resampling (100 iterations) for internal validation.

Results: Mean patient age was 66.80 ± 11.57 years with 57.61% female. Overall, 30-day mortality was 0.4% with major complications occurring in 2.4%. RAI demonstrated superior discrimination for mortality (AUC 0.822) compared to mFI-5 (0.688, p < 0.001). For non-home discharge, RAI achieved AUC 0.735 versus mFI-5 0.607 (p < 0.001). RAI showed strong performance for extended length of stay (AUC 0.624) and minor complications (AUC 0.652), significantly outperforming mFI-5 across multiple outcome measures.

Conclusion: The Risk Analysis Index significantly outperforms the mFI-5 across key outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty for mechanical prosthetic complications. Its multidomain structure, which captures age, functional dependence, comorbidities, and acute physiological stress, makes it a superior tool for surgical risk stratification, discharge planning, and identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from targeted perioperative optimisation.

风险分析指数与传统虚弱指标在预测改良全髋关节置换术后机械假体并发症预后方面的比较。
背景:虚弱评估在预测手术结果方面变得越来越重要,特别是在复杂的翻修手术中。在因机械假体并发症而接受翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)的患者中,最佳虚弱分层仍然没有明确的定义。本研究比较了风险分析指数(RAI)和改良的5项衰弱指数(mFI-5)在预测高危人群术后预后方面的作用。方法:我们采用2015-2021年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)的数据,对5631例因机械假体并发症而接受rTHA的成年患者进行了回顾性队列研究。使用RAI和mFI-5评估脆弱性,并通过已发表的算法计算。主要结局为30天全因死亡率和非家庭出院。次要结局包括主要并发症、次要并发症、计划外再入院、再手术和延长住院时间(LOS 4天)。使用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估鉴别性能,并进行自举重采样(100次迭代)进行内部验证。结果:患者平均年龄66.80±11.57岁,女性占57.61%。总体而言,30天死亡率为0.4%,主要并发症发生率为2.4%。与mFI-5 (0.688, p)相比,RAI在死亡率方面表现出更强的区分性(AUC 0.822)。结论:风险分析指数在机械假体并发症翻修全髋关节置换术后的关键结果上明显优于mFI-5。它的多域结构,可以捕获年龄,功能依赖,合并症和急性生理应激,使其成为手术风险分层,出院计划和识别高危患者的优越工具,这些患者可能受益于有针对性的围手术期优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书