{"title":"Enhancing Microvascular Anastomosis Using an Axial-View Microscope.","authors":"Sotatsu Fukuyama, Ryohei Ishihara, Masayuki Okochi, Kyoko Dogo, Michiko Fukuba, Masahiro Nakagawa, Yuzo Komuro","doi":"10.1055/a-2905-6935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Under a conventional digital microscope, the cross-section of a vessel is visualized as a long oval because it is observed from a bird's-eye perspective (bird's-eye-view microscope, bMS). This limited perspective can hinder accurate identification of the vascular lumen and tunica intima during microvascular anastomosis. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel microscope system that provides an axial view of the vascular stump (axial-view microscope, aMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental study, we used our proprietary digital microscope, which integrates a low-resolution digital camera with the aMS system, and defined this system as the bMS. Ten chicken femoral arteries were used, and two arterial anastomoses were created for each artery. One anastomosis was performed using both the bMS and aMS (aMS-assisted group), whereas the other was performed using the bMS alone (bMS-only group). Anastomosis creation was divided into two stages. Stage 1 consisted of identifying the tunica intima and inserting the surgical needle through the vascular wall. Stage 2 included all remaining procedures, excluding rotation of the vascular clamp, intraluminal irrigation, and adjustment of vessel position. Operative times were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ratio of the average duration of Stage 1 (front and back sides combined) in the aMS-assisted group relative to the bMS-only group was 0.58 ± 0.19, indicating a significantly shorter Stage 1 duration with aMS use (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The ratio of the average total anastomosis time was 0.88 ± 0.08, demonstrating a significant reduction in overall anastomosis time in the aMS-assisted group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aMS provides direct visualization of the vascular cross-section and facilitates rapid identification of the tunica intima without prolonging other steps of microvascular anastomosis. These findings indicate that this system may enhance the operative view and reduce anastomosis time in microsurgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2905-6935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Under a conventional digital microscope, the cross-section of a vessel is visualized as a long oval because it is observed from a bird's-eye perspective (bird's-eye-view microscope, bMS). This limited perspective can hinder accurate identification of the vascular lumen and tunica intima during microvascular anastomosis. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel microscope system that provides an axial view of the vascular stump (axial-view microscope, aMS).
Methods: In this experimental study, we used our proprietary digital microscope, which integrates a low-resolution digital camera with the aMS system, and defined this system as the bMS. Ten chicken femoral arteries were used, and two arterial anastomoses were created for each artery. One anastomosis was performed using both the bMS and aMS (aMS-assisted group), whereas the other was performed using the bMS alone (bMS-only group). Anastomosis creation was divided into two stages. Stage 1 consisted of identifying the tunica intima and inserting the surgical needle through the vascular wall. Stage 2 included all remaining procedures, excluding rotation of the vascular clamp, intraluminal irrigation, and adjustment of vessel position. Operative times were recorded and compared between groups.
Results: The ratio of the average duration of Stage 1 (front and back sides combined) in the aMS-assisted group relative to the bMS-only group was 0.58 ± 0.19, indicating a significantly shorter Stage 1 duration with aMS use (p < 0.001). The ratio of the average total anastomosis time was 0.88 ± 0.08, demonstrating a significant reduction in overall anastomosis time in the aMS-assisted group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The aMS provides direct visualization of the vascular cross-section and facilitates rapid identification of the tunica intima without prolonging other steps of microvascular anastomosis. These findings indicate that this system may enhance the operative view and reduce anastomosis time in microsurgical procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.