Enhancing Microvascular Anastomosis Using an Axial-View Microscope.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sotatsu Fukuyama, Ryohei Ishihara, Masayuki Okochi, Kyoko Dogo, Michiko Fukuba, Masahiro Nakagawa, Yuzo Komuro
{"title":"Enhancing Microvascular Anastomosis Using an Axial-View Microscope.","authors":"Sotatsu Fukuyama, Ryohei Ishihara, Masayuki Okochi, Kyoko Dogo, Michiko Fukuba, Masahiro Nakagawa, Yuzo Komuro","doi":"10.1055/a-2905-6935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Under a conventional digital microscope, the cross-section of a vessel is visualized as a long oval because it is observed from a bird's-eye perspective (bird's-eye-view microscope, bMS). This limited perspective can hinder accurate identification of the vascular lumen and tunica intima during microvascular anastomosis. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel microscope system that provides an axial view of the vascular stump (axial-view microscope, aMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental study, we used our proprietary digital microscope, which integrates a low-resolution digital camera with the aMS system, and defined this system as the bMS. Ten chicken femoral arteries were used, and two arterial anastomoses were created for each artery. One anastomosis was performed using both the bMS and aMS (aMS-assisted group), whereas the other was performed using the bMS alone (bMS-only group). Anastomosis creation was divided into two stages. Stage 1 consisted of identifying the tunica intima and inserting the surgical needle through the vascular wall. Stage 2 included all remaining procedures, excluding rotation of the vascular clamp, intraluminal irrigation, and adjustment of vessel position. Operative times were recorded and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ratio of the average duration of Stage 1 (front and back sides combined) in the aMS-assisted group relative to the bMS-only group was 0.58 ± 0.19, indicating a significantly shorter Stage 1 duration with aMS use (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The ratio of the average total anastomosis time was 0.88 ± 0.08, demonstrating a significant reduction in overall anastomosis time in the aMS-assisted group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aMS provides direct visualization of the vascular cross-section and facilitates rapid identification of the tunica intima without prolonging other steps of microvascular anastomosis. These findings indicate that this system may enhance the operative view and reduce anastomosis time in microsurgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2905-6935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Under a conventional digital microscope, the cross-section of a vessel is visualized as a long oval because it is observed from a bird's-eye perspective (bird's-eye-view microscope, bMS). This limited perspective can hinder accurate identification of the vascular lumen and tunica intima during microvascular anastomosis. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel microscope system that provides an axial view of the vascular stump (axial-view microscope, aMS).

Methods: In this experimental study, we used our proprietary digital microscope, which integrates a low-resolution digital camera with the aMS system, and defined this system as the bMS. Ten chicken femoral arteries were used, and two arterial anastomoses were created for each artery. One anastomosis was performed using both the bMS and aMS (aMS-assisted group), whereas the other was performed using the bMS alone (bMS-only group). Anastomosis creation was divided into two stages. Stage 1 consisted of identifying the tunica intima and inserting the surgical needle through the vascular wall. Stage 2 included all remaining procedures, excluding rotation of the vascular clamp, intraluminal irrigation, and adjustment of vessel position. Operative times were recorded and compared between groups.

Results: The ratio of the average duration of Stage 1 (front and back sides combined) in the aMS-assisted group relative to the bMS-only group was 0.58 ± 0.19, indicating a significantly shorter Stage 1 duration with aMS use (p < 0.001). The ratio of the average total anastomosis time was 0.88 ± 0.08, demonstrating a significant reduction in overall anastomosis time in the aMS-assisted group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The aMS provides direct visualization of the vascular cross-section and facilitates rapid identification of the tunica intima without prolonging other steps of microvascular anastomosis. These findings indicate that this system may enhance the operative view and reduce anastomosis time in microsurgical procedures.

利用轴向显微镜增强微血管吻合。
背景:在传统的数码显微镜下,血管的横截面显示为一个长椭圆形,因为它是从鸟瞰角度观察的(鸟眼显微镜,bMS)。在微血管吻合过程中,这种有限的视角会妨碍对血管腔和膜内膜的准确识别。为了克服这一限制,我们开发了一种新的显微镜系统,可以提供血管残端的轴向视图(轴向视图显微镜,aMS)。方法:在本实验研究中,我们使用了我们专有的数码显微镜,该显微镜将低分辨率数码相机与aMS系统集成在一起,并将该系统定义为bMS。选取10条鸡股动脉,每条动脉造2条动脉吻合口。一组同时使用bMS和aMS进行吻合(aMS辅助组),而另一组仅使用bMS进行吻合(bMS组)。吻合口形成分为两个阶段。第一阶段包括识别膜内膜,并通过血管壁插入手术针。二期包括所有剩余的手术,不包括旋转血管钳、腔内冲洗和调整血管位置。记录两组手术时间并进行比较。结果:aMS辅助组与单纯bms组相比,平均一期持续时间(前后两侧合并)为0.58±0.19,使用aMS显著缩短了一期持续时间(p < 0.001)。平均总吻合时间之比为0.88±0.08,ams辅助组总吻合时间明显缩短(p < 0.001)。结论:aMS能直接显示血管横截面,便于快速识别内膜,而不延长微血管吻合的其他步骤。该系统在显微外科手术中可提高手术视野,缩短吻合时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书