From Offerings to Food: A Qualitative Study of Lungsuran Handling and Nutrition Potential in Urban Bali.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
I Desak Ketut Dewi Satiawati Kurnianingsih
{"title":"From Offerings to Food: A Qualitative Study of <i>Lungsuran</i> Handling and Nutrition Potential in Urban Bali.","authors":"I Desak Ketut Dewi Satiawati Kurnianingsih","doi":"10.1177/03795721261457483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEdible residues from Hindu offerings (<i>lungsuran</i>) may enter mixed waste streams despite retaining nutritional value. Although food rescue research has focused on household leftovers and supply-chain loss, less is known about how culturally governed norms and changing ritual economies shape post-ritual handling of edible offerings.ObjectiveTo examine how socio-religious norms, authority structures, and changing ritual economies shape <i>lungsuran</i> handling in urban Bali and identify culturally legitimate pathways for nutrition-sensitive recovery.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study in Denpasar, Indonesia, from September to November 2025 using 20 in-depth interviews with key informants, 4 focus group discussions involving 40 participants, and structured observations across 8 household and temple ritual settings. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically.ResultsParticipants described <i>lungsuran</i> as edible and blessed, yet discard occurred in both household and temple settings, especially after large or frequent ceremonies. Post-ritual handling was shaped by four interrelated mechanisms: ritual-temporal suitability, authority and ownership, social permission and hierarchy, and marketization with devotional abundance. Reuse was more likely when decision rights were clear, social permission was explicit, and sorting occurred within an acceptable safety window. In pooled temple settings, ownership ambiguity, reluctance to be seen taking food, and reliance on purchased offerings increased discard. Across settings, time, labor, containers, storage, and transport affected recovery.Conclusions<i>Lungsuran</i> is not ordinary leftover food but a culturally governed edible flow. Nutrition-sensitive recovery is more likely when it aligns with ritual timing, clarifies authority, reduces social hesitation, and integrates food safety into community governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3795721261457483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721261457483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundEdible residues from Hindu offerings (lungsuran) may enter mixed waste streams despite retaining nutritional value. Although food rescue research has focused on household leftovers and supply-chain loss, less is known about how culturally governed norms and changing ritual economies shape post-ritual handling of edible offerings.ObjectiveTo examine how socio-religious norms, authority structures, and changing ritual economies shape lungsuran handling in urban Bali and identify culturally legitimate pathways for nutrition-sensitive recovery.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study in Denpasar, Indonesia, from September to November 2025 using 20 in-depth interviews with key informants, 4 focus group discussions involving 40 participants, and structured observations across 8 household and temple ritual settings. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically.ResultsParticipants described lungsuran as edible and blessed, yet discard occurred in both household and temple settings, especially after large or frequent ceremonies. Post-ritual handling was shaped by four interrelated mechanisms: ritual-temporal suitability, authority and ownership, social permission and hierarchy, and marketization with devotional abundance. Reuse was more likely when decision rights were clear, social permission was explicit, and sorting occurred within an acceptable safety window. In pooled temple settings, ownership ambiguity, reluctance to be seen taking food, and reliance on purchased offerings increased discard. Across settings, time, labor, containers, storage, and transport affected recovery.ConclusionsLungsuran is not ordinary leftover food but a culturally governed edible flow. Nutrition-sensitive recovery is more likely when it aligns with ritual timing, clarifies authority, reduces social hesitation, and integrates food safety into community governance.

从供品到食物:巴厘岛城市龙素兰处理和营养潜力的定性研究。
印度教祭品(lungsuran)的可食用残留物尽管保留了营养价值,但可能会进入混合废物流。尽管食品救援研究的重点是家庭剩菜和供应链损失,但人们对文化规范和不断变化的仪式经济如何影响仪式后对可食用产品的处理知之甚少。目的研究社会宗教规范、权威结构和不断变化的仪式经济如何影响巴厘岛城市的隆素兰处理,并确定文化上合理的营养敏感恢复途径。方法:我们于2025年9月至11月在印度尼西亚登巴萨进行了定性研究,对关键信息提供者进行了20次深度访谈,对40名参与者进行了4次焦点小组讨论,并在8个家庭和寺庙仪式环境中进行了结构化观察。对数据进行转录、编码和主题分析。结果:参与者将龙素描述为可食用和有福的,然而在家庭和寺庙环境中,特别是在大型或频繁的仪式之后,丢弃的现象也会发生。仪式后的处理是由四种相互关联的机制形成的:仪式-时间适用性、权威和所有权、社会许可和等级制度,以及具有虔诚丰裕的市场化。当决策权明确、社会许可明确、排序在可接受的安全窗口内进行时,重用更有可能发生。在集中的寺庙环境中,所有权模糊,不愿被看到吃东西,以及依赖购买的供品增加了丢弃。在设置、时间、人工、容器、存储和运输方面影响恢复。结论龙水不是普通的剩饭,而是一种文化支配的食用流。如果与仪式时间一致、明确权力、减少社会犹豫并将食品安全纳入社区治理,营养敏感型恢复就更有可能实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书