{"title":"Validation of Onco-MPI and Geriatric-8 for predicting 2-year mortality in older Indian patients with breast cancer: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Shivani Sable, Tabassum Wadasadawala, Myvizhi Kannan, Rajiv Sarin, Rima Pathak, Revathy Krishnamurthy, Seema Gulia, Shalaka Joshi, Palak Popat, Tanuja Shet","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2026.2099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying vulnerabilities in older patients through comprehensive geriatric assessment is crucial but resource-intensive. This prospective study validated shorter tools- Onco-multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) and Geriatric-8 (G8) for predicting 2-year mortality in breast cancer patients and developed a nomogram using significant clinical predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The geriatric assessment was done in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve breast cancer patients with age ≥65 years. Overall survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier test; univariate and multivariate analyses done to determine predictors of survival using Cox-proportional hazards model. A nomogram was constructed based on multivariate model and validated using calibration curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 300 patients (median age 70 years, IQR 67-74), 95.6% had ECOG-PS 0-1. High-grade histology and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) positivity were seen in 77% and 30%, respectively. Most patients (77.6%) were non-metastatic. Luminal, HER2+ and triple negative subtype was present in 70%, 10.3% and 18.7% tumours. Rate of non-compliance to treatment was 25%. At median follow-up of 28.8 months, 2-year survival was 78%. The 2-year mortality for Onco-MPI categories was 13.36% (low-risk), 25.9% (medium-risk) and 29.8% (high-risk); high versus low-risk showed statistical difference (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13, 6.37; <i>p</i> = 0.026). G8 scores ≤14 and ≤12 both significantly predicted survival (<i>p</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, higher nodal stage, metastatic status, triple negative breast cancer subtype and LVI positivity independently predicted poorer survival. G8 score remained a significant predictor at both cut-offs (≤14 and ≤12) compared to Onco-MPI. A nomogram integrating nodal stage, metastatic status, LVI and G8 predicted 1- and 2-year survival with a C-index of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84) and demonstrated good calibration at 12 and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly breast cancer patients, G8 score was a stronger predictor of survival, outperforming onco-MPI. The nomogram combining conventional prognostic factors with G8 showed good discrimination for pre-treatment prognostication.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"2099"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13319346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2026.2099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Identifying vulnerabilities in older patients through comprehensive geriatric assessment is crucial but resource-intensive. This prospective study validated shorter tools- Onco-multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) and Geriatric-8 (G8) for predicting 2-year mortality in breast cancer patients and developed a nomogram using significant clinical predictors.
Methods: The geriatric assessment was done in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve breast cancer patients with age ≥65 years. Overall survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier test; univariate and multivariate analyses done to determine predictors of survival using Cox-proportional hazards model. A nomogram was constructed based on multivariate model and validated using calibration curve.
Results: Among 300 patients (median age 70 years, IQR 67-74), 95.6% had ECOG-PS 0-1. High-grade histology and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) positivity were seen in 77% and 30%, respectively. Most patients (77.6%) were non-metastatic. Luminal, HER2+ and triple negative subtype was present in 70%, 10.3% and 18.7% tumours. Rate of non-compliance to treatment was 25%. At median follow-up of 28.8 months, 2-year survival was 78%. The 2-year mortality for Onco-MPI categories was 13.36% (low-risk), 25.9% (medium-risk) and 29.8% (high-risk); high versus low-risk showed statistical difference (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13, 6.37; p = 0.026). G8 scores ≤14 and ≤12 both significantly predicted survival (p = 0.001; p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, higher nodal stage, metastatic status, triple negative breast cancer subtype and LVI positivity independently predicted poorer survival. G8 score remained a significant predictor at both cut-offs (≤14 and ≤12) compared to Onco-MPI. A nomogram integrating nodal stage, metastatic status, LVI and G8 predicted 1- and 2-year survival with a C-index of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84) and demonstrated good calibration at 12 and 24 months.
Conclusion: In elderly breast cancer patients, G8 score was a stronger predictor of survival, outperforming onco-MPI. The nomogram combining conventional prognostic factors with G8 showed good discrimination for pre-treatment prognostication.