The Efficacy and Safety of Clip-Assisted Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection for Gastric Varices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s10620-026-10071-z
Mohamed Abuelazm, Yousef Hawas, Belal Mohamed Hamed, Abdelrahman Awad, EzzElDien A Ibrahim, Hatem Eltaly, Mohamed Nasser Elshabrawi, Ibrahim Gowaily, Mohamed Elgendy, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Clip-Assisted Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection for Gastric Varices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Abuelazm, Yousef Hawas, Belal Mohamed Hamed, Abdelrahman Awad, EzzElDien A Ibrahim, Hatem Eltaly, Mohamed Nasser Elshabrawi, Ibrahim Gowaily, Mohamed Elgendy, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1007/s10620-026-10071-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bleeding from gastric varices (GVs) is a severe complication of portal hypertension. Conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (Con-ECI) is an effective treatment, but it is associated with significant risks of rebleeding and systemic ectopic embolism. Clip-assisted ECI (Clip-ECI), where clips are deployed before glue injection, has been developed to mitigate these risks, but its efficacy remains debatable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies up to August 2025. The primary outcomes were all-cause rebleeding and ectopic embolism. Secondary outcomes included variceal obliteration, mortality, and procedure-related complications. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled from randomized and non-randomized studies using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Prospero id: </strong>CRD420251163015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 783 patients were included. Compared to Con-ECI, Clip-ECI was associated with a significantly lower risk of variceal rebleeding (RR: 0.24; 95% CI [0.12, 0.48]; P < 0.001) and ectopic embolism (RR: 0.31; 95% CI [0.13, 0.76]; P = 0.01). The pooled rates of variceal rebleeding and ectopic embolism in the Clip-ECI group were 7.1% and 2.1%, respectively. Also, Clip-ECI achieved a significantly higher rate of complete variceal obliteration (RR: 1.39; 95% CI [1.23, 1.57]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (P = 0.28), technical success (P = 0.35), or other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with GVs, Clip-ECI significantly reduces the risks of rebleeding and ectopic embolism while improving variceal obliteration, without increasing adverse events, compared with Con-ECI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5326-5345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10071-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bleeding from gastric varices (GVs) is a severe complication of portal hypertension. Conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (Con-ECI) is an effective treatment, but it is associated with significant risks of rebleeding and systemic ectopic embolism. Clip-assisted ECI (Clip-ECI), where clips are deployed before glue injection, has been developed to mitigate these risks, but its efficacy remains debatable.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies up to August 2025. The primary outcomes were all-cause rebleeding and ectopic embolism. Secondary outcomes included variceal obliteration, mortality, and procedure-related complications. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled from randomized and non-randomized studies using a random-effects model.

Prospero id: CRD420251163015.

Results: Seven studies involving 783 patients were included. Compared to Con-ECI, Clip-ECI was associated with a significantly lower risk of variceal rebleeding (RR: 0.24; 95% CI [0.12, 0.48]; P < 0.001) and ectopic embolism (RR: 0.31; 95% CI [0.13, 0.76]; P = 0.01). The pooled rates of variceal rebleeding and ectopic embolism in the Clip-ECI group were 7.1% and 2.1%, respectively. Also, Clip-ECI achieved a significantly higher rate of complete variceal obliteration (RR: 1.39; 95% CI [1.23, 1.57]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (P = 0.28), technical success (P = 0.35), or other adverse events.

Conclusion: In patients with GVs, Clip-ECI significantly reduces the risks of rebleeding and ectopic embolism while improving variceal obliteration, without increasing adverse events, compared with Con-ECI.

图:夹式内镜下注射氰基丙烯酸酯治疗胃静脉曲张的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:胃静脉曲张出血是门脉高压的严重并发症。常规的内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射(Con-ECI)是一种有效的治疗方法,但它与再出血和全身异位栓塞的显著风险相关。夹子辅助ECI (Clip-ECI),在注射胶之前部署夹子,已经被开发出来以减轻这些风险,但其有效性仍然存在争议。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus,检索截止到2025年8月的研究。主要结局是全因再出血和异位栓塞。次要结局包括静脉曲张闭塞、死亡率和手术相关并发症。使用随机效应模型将随机和非随机研究的风险比(RR)与95%置信区间(CI)合并。普洛斯彼罗id: CRD420251163015。结果:纳入7项研究,涉及783例患者。与Con-ECI相比,Clip-ECI与静脉曲张再出血风险显著降低相关(RR: 0.24; 95% CI [0.12, 0.48]; P结论:与Con-ECI相比,在GVs患者中,Clip-ECI可显著降低再出血和异位栓塞的风险,同时改善静脉曲张闭塞,未增加不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书