Mohamed Abuelazm, Yousef Hawas, Belal Mohamed Hamed, Abdelrahman Awad, EzzElDien A Ibrahim, Hatem Eltaly, Mohamed Nasser Elshabrawi, Ibrahim Gowaily, Mohamed Elgendy, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Clip-Assisted Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection for Gastric Varices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Abuelazm, Yousef Hawas, Belal Mohamed Hamed, Abdelrahman Awad, EzzElDien A Ibrahim, Hatem Eltaly, Mohamed Nasser Elshabrawi, Ibrahim Gowaily, Mohamed Elgendy, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1007/s10620-026-10071-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bleeding from gastric varices (GVs) is a severe complication of portal hypertension. Conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (Con-ECI) is an effective treatment, but it is associated with significant risks of rebleeding and systemic ectopic embolism. Clip-assisted ECI (Clip-ECI), where clips are deployed before glue injection, has been developed to mitigate these risks, but its efficacy remains debatable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies up to August 2025. The primary outcomes were all-cause rebleeding and ectopic embolism. Secondary outcomes included variceal obliteration, mortality, and procedure-related complications. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled from randomized and non-randomized studies using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Prospero id: </strong>CRD420251163015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 783 patients were included. Compared to Con-ECI, Clip-ECI was associated with a significantly lower risk of variceal rebleeding (RR: 0.24; 95% CI [0.12, 0.48]; P < 0.001) and ectopic embolism (RR: 0.31; 95% CI [0.13, 0.76]; P = 0.01). The pooled rates of variceal rebleeding and ectopic embolism in the Clip-ECI group were 7.1% and 2.1%, respectively. Also, Clip-ECI achieved a significantly higher rate of complete variceal obliteration (RR: 1.39; 95% CI [1.23, 1.57]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (P = 0.28), technical success (P = 0.35), or other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with GVs, Clip-ECI significantly reduces the risks of rebleeding and ectopic embolism while improving variceal obliteration, without increasing adverse events, compared with Con-ECI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5326-5345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10071-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bleeding from gastric varices (GVs) is a severe complication of portal hypertension. Conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (Con-ECI) is an effective treatment, but it is associated with significant risks of rebleeding and systemic ectopic embolism. Clip-assisted ECI (Clip-ECI), where clips are deployed before glue injection, has been developed to mitigate these risks, but its efficacy remains debatable.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies up to August 2025. The primary outcomes were all-cause rebleeding and ectopic embolism. Secondary outcomes included variceal obliteration, mortality, and procedure-related complications. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled from randomized and non-randomized studies using a random-effects model.
Prospero id: CRD420251163015.
Results: Seven studies involving 783 patients were included. Compared to Con-ECI, Clip-ECI was associated with a significantly lower risk of variceal rebleeding (RR: 0.24; 95% CI [0.12, 0.48]; P < 0.001) and ectopic embolism (RR: 0.31; 95% CI [0.13, 0.76]; P = 0.01). The pooled rates of variceal rebleeding and ectopic embolism in the Clip-ECI group were 7.1% and 2.1%, respectively. Also, Clip-ECI achieved a significantly higher rate of complete variceal obliteration (RR: 1.39; 95% CI [1.23, 1.57]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (P = 0.28), technical success (P = 0.35), or other adverse events.
Conclusion: In patients with GVs, Clip-ECI significantly reduces the risks of rebleeding and ectopic embolism while improving variceal obliteration, without increasing adverse events, compared with Con-ECI.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.