Feasibility of a generative AI chatbot to support breastfeeding in the Brazilian Unified National Health System.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cadernos de saude publica Pub Date : 2026-06-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102-311XEN117825
Ari Pereira de Araújo Neto, Giovanny Rebouças Pinto, Adonias Caetano de Oliveira, Simone Nunes Leal Chagas, Francilidia Oliveira Vitorino de Assunção Conceição, Ariel Soares Teles
{"title":"Feasibility of a generative AI chatbot to support breastfeeding in the Brazilian Unified National Health System.","authors":"Ari Pereira de Araújo Neto, Giovanny Rebouças Pinto, Adonias Caetano de Oliveira, Simone Nunes Leal Chagas, Francilidia Oliveira Vitorino de Assunção Conceição, Ariel Soares Teles","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XEN117825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This exploratory feasibility study aimed to evaluate the usability, user experience, and preliminary impacts of a generative language model-based chatbot (Lhia 2.0) on maternal self-efficacy and attitudes toward breastfeeding. A total of 13 mothers receiving care at the Human Milk Bank of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão interacted with the chatbot via WhatsApp over 15 days. The following instruments were applied before and after the use of Lhia 2.0: the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form (BSES-SF) and the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS). The User Experience Questionnaire - Short Version (UEQ-S) was applied after the interaction. Results indicated excellent usability (pragmatic quality = +2.36; hedonic quality = +2.57) and high engagement (average interaction time = 92 minutes). Statistically significant improvements were observed in BSES-SF (mean difference = 3.00; p = 0.042; Cohen's d = 0.778) and in IIFAS (mean difference = 3.50; p = 0.021; Cohen's d = 0.778). The results indicated high acceptance among mothers, with notable user engagement, excellent perceived usability, and positive effects on confidence and attitudes toward breastfeeding. Based on these findings, Lhia 2.0 is considered a feasible and promising tool for integration into breastfeeding promotion strategies, particularly within the context of the Brazilian Unified National Health System.</p>","PeriodicalId":9398,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de saude publica","volume":"42 ","pages":"e00117825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13313153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XEN117825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory feasibility study aimed to evaluate the usability, user experience, and preliminary impacts of a generative language model-based chatbot (Lhia 2.0) on maternal self-efficacy and attitudes toward breastfeeding. A total of 13 mothers receiving care at the Human Milk Bank of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão interacted with the chatbot via WhatsApp over 15 days. The following instruments were applied before and after the use of Lhia 2.0: the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form (BSES-SF) and the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale (IIFAS). The User Experience Questionnaire - Short Version (UEQ-S) was applied after the interaction. Results indicated excellent usability (pragmatic quality = +2.36; hedonic quality = +2.57) and high engagement (average interaction time = 92 minutes). Statistically significant improvements were observed in BSES-SF (mean difference = 3.00; p = 0.042; Cohen's d = 0.778) and in IIFAS (mean difference = 3.50; p = 0.021; Cohen's d = 0.778). The results indicated high acceptance among mothers, with notable user engagement, excellent perceived usability, and positive effects on confidence and attitudes toward breastfeeding. Based on these findings, Lhia 2.0 is considered a feasible and promising tool for integration into breastfeeding promotion strategies, particularly within the context of the Brazilian Unified National Health System.

生成式人工智能聊天机器人在巴西统一国家卫生系统支持母乳喂养的可行性。
本探索性可行性研究旨在评估基于生成语言模型的聊天机器人(Lhia 2.0)的可用性、用户体验以及对母亲自我效能感和母乳喂养态度的初步影响。共有13名母亲在马拉赫联邦大学大学医院的母乳库接受护理,他们通过WhatsApp与聊天机器人进行了超过15天的互动。使用Lhia 2.0前后分别使用以下工具:母乳喂养自我效能简易量表(BSES-SF)和爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表(IIFAS)。用户体验问卷-短版本(UEQ-S)在互动后应用。结果显示出色的可用性(实用质量= +2.36;享乐质量= +2.57)和高参与度(平均交互时间= 92分钟)。BSES-SF和IIFAS的改善具有统计学意义(平均差异= 3.00,p = 0.042, Cohen’s d = 0.778),差异有统计学意义(平均差异= 3.50,p = 0.021, Cohen’s d = 0.778)。结果表明,母亲们对母乳喂养的接受度很高,具有显著的用户参与度,出色的感知可用性,以及对母乳喂养的信心和态度的积极影响。基于这些发现,Lhia 2.0被认为是一个可行和有前途的工具,可纳入母乳喂养促进战略,特别是在巴西统一国家卫生系统的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cadernos de saude publica
Cadernos de saude publica 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
356
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health (CSP) is a monthly journal published by the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ). The journal is devoted to the publication of scientific articles focusing on the production of knowledge in Public Health. CSP also aims to foster critical reflection and debate on current themes related to public policies and factors that impact populations'' living conditions and health care. All articles submitted to CSP are judiciously evaluated by the Editorial Board, composed of the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors, respecting the diversity of approaches, objects, and methods of the different disciplines characterizing the field of Public Health. Originality, relevance, and methodological rigor are the principal characteristics considered in the editorial evaluation. The article evaluation system practiced by CSP consists of two stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书