Cerebrovascular risk with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies versus onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with migraine: A real-world pharmacoepidemiologic study in the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program.
Sedat Gül, Bradley Ong, Stephen Trudeau, Nicolas Thompson, Hsiangkuo Yuan
{"title":"Cerebrovascular risk with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies versus onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with migraine: A real-world pharmacoepidemiologic study in the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program.","authors":"Sedat Gül, Bradley Ong, Stephen Trudeau, Nicolas Thompson, Hsiangkuo Yuan","doi":"10.1177/03331024261464438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimTo evaluate whether initiation of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was non-inferior to initiation of onabotulinumtoxinA with respect to the hazard of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (IS + TIA) in a real-world cohort of adults with migraine.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user pharmacoepidemiology study using the NIH All of Us Research Program Registered Tier Dataset (v8). Adults with migraine initiating CGRP mAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab) were compared with initiators of onabotulinumtoxinA from January 2018 through September 2023. The primary outcome was IS + TIA occurring more than 90 days after treatment initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized propensity scores was used to adjust for 23 baseline covariates. Non-inferiority was assessed on the hazard ratio (HR) scale using a prespecified margin of 1.5, with non-inferiority concluded if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was less than 1.5. Prespecified subgroup analyses included migraine with aura and without aura. Prespecified sensitivity analyses included a per-protocol analysis, a crossover-excluded analysis, and an IS-only analysis. Fracture was used as a negative control outcome.ResultsAmong 16,147 patients with migraine in the cohort, the primary comparison included 1,581 CGRP mAb initiators and 947 onabotulinumtoxinA initiators. IPTW achieved a good covariate balance for the primary comparison (maximum standardized mean difference 0.016). For the primary outcome, 14 IS + TIA events occurred among CGRP mAb initiators and 22 among onabotulinumtoxinA initiators. The hazard ratio for IS + TIA was 0.524 (95% CI 0.263-1.046), which met the prespecified statistical criterion for non-inferiority because the upper confidence bound was below 1.5; however, the estimate was imprecise because of the small number of events. In the migraine with aura subgroup, the estimate also met the non-inferiority criterion (HR 0.419, 95% CI 0.163-1.080), whereas the migraine without aura subgroup, per-protocol analysis, and major adverse cardiovascular events analysis were inconclusive for non-inferiority. For major adverse cardiovascular events the HR was 1.068 (95% CI 0.589-1.935). The fracture negative control was also not significantly different (HR, 1.175; 95% CI, 0.692-1.993; p = 0.551), arguing against systematic healthy-user confounding. A formal adjusted comparison with untreated patients was not feasible due to structural confounding inherent to the stepped-care treatment pathway.ConclusionsIn this real-world diverse cohort, initiation of CGRP mAbs met the prespecified statistical criterion for non-inferiority relative to onabotulinumtoxinA for the primary IS + TIA outcome. However, this finding was based on few events and wide CIs and should be interpreted cautiously as limited evidence against a large relative increase in incident IS + TIA risk, rather than as definitive evidence of equivalent safety, absence of modest harm, or a protective effect. Several secondary, subgroup, and supportive analyses remained inconclusive for non-inferiority. Larger adequately powered comparative safety studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"46 7","pages":"3331024261464438"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261464438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AimTo evaluate whether initiation of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was non-inferior to initiation of onabotulinumtoxinA with respect to the hazard of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (IS + TIA) in a real-world cohort of adults with migraine.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user pharmacoepidemiology study using the NIH All of Us Research Program Registered Tier Dataset (v8). Adults with migraine initiating CGRP mAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab) were compared with initiators of onabotulinumtoxinA from January 2018 through September 2023. The primary outcome was IS + TIA occurring more than 90 days after treatment initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized propensity scores was used to adjust for 23 baseline covariates. Non-inferiority was assessed on the hazard ratio (HR) scale using a prespecified margin of 1.5, with non-inferiority concluded if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was less than 1.5. Prespecified subgroup analyses included migraine with aura and without aura. Prespecified sensitivity analyses included a per-protocol analysis, a crossover-excluded analysis, and an IS-only analysis. Fracture was used as a negative control outcome.ResultsAmong 16,147 patients with migraine in the cohort, the primary comparison included 1,581 CGRP mAb initiators and 947 onabotulinumtoxinA initiators. IPTW achieved a good covariate balance for the primary comparison (maximum standardized mean difference 0.016). For the primary outcome, 14 IS + TIA events occurred among CGRP mAb initiators and 22 among onabotulinumtoxinA initiators. The hazard ratio for IS + TIA was 0.524 (95% CI 0.263-1.046), which met the prespecified statistical criterion for non-inferiority because the upper confidence bound was below 1.5; however, the estimate was imprecise because of the small number of events. In the migraine with aura subgroup, the estimate also met the non-inferiority criterion (HR 0.419, 95% CI 0.163-1.080), whereas the migraine without aura subgroup, per-protocol analysis, and major adverse cardiovascular events analysis were inconclusive for non-inferiority. For major adverse cardiovascular events the HR was 1.068 (95% CI 0.589-1.935). The fracture negative control was also not significantly different (HR, 1.175; 95% CI, 0.692-1.993; p = 0.551), arguing against systematic healthy-user confounding. A formal adjusted comparison with untreated patients was not feasible due to structural confounding inherent to the stepped-care treatment pathway.ConclusionsIn this real-world diverse cohort, initiation of CGRP mAbs met the prespecified statistical criterion for non-inferiority relative to onabotulinumtoxinA for the primary IS + TIA outcome. However, this finding was based on few events and wide CIs and should be interpreted cautiously as limited evidence against a large relative increase in incident IS + TIA risk, rather than as definitive evidence of equivalent safety, absence of modest harm, or a protective effect. Several secondary, subgroup, and supportive analyses remained inconclusive for non-inferiority. Larger adequately powered comparative safety studies are needed.
目的评估在现实世界中偏头痛成人队列中,开始使用降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mab)是否不低于开始使用onabotulinumtoxinA对缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(IS + TIA)的危害。方法我们使用NIH All of Us Research Program注册Tier Dataset (v8)进行了一项回顾性、主动比较、新用户药物流行病学研究。从2018年1月至2023年9月,偏头痛成人首发CGRP单克隆抗体(erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab)与onabotulinumtoxinA首发者进行了比较。主要结局是IS + TIA在治疗开始后超过90天发生。使用稳定倾向得分的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来调整23个基线协变量。在风险比(HR)量表上使用预先指定的1.5的边际来评估非劣效性,如果95%置信区间(CI)的上界小于1.5,则判定非劣效性。预先指定的亚组分析包括先兆偏头痛和无先兆偏头痛。预先指定的敏感性分析包括按协议分析、交叉排除分析和仅is分析。骨折作为阴性对照结果。在该队列的16147例偏头痛患者中,主要比较包括1581例CGRP单抗启动剂和947例肉毒杆菌毒素启动剂。IPTW在主要比较中取得了良好的协变量平衡(最大标准化平均差为0.016)。对于主要结局,CGRP单抗启动者中发生14例IS + TIA事件,单肉毒杆菌毒素a启动者中发生22例。IS + TIA的风险比为0.524 (95% CI 0.263-1.046),由于上置信区间小于1.5,符合预先设定的非劣效性统计标准;然而,由于事件数量较少,估计并不准确。在有先兆偏头痛亚组中,估计也符合非劣效性标准(HR 0.419, 95% CI 0.163-1.080),而无先兆偏头痛亚组,按方案分析和主要不良心血管事件分析对非劣效性没有定论。主要不良心血管事件的HR为1.068 (95% CI 0.589-1.935)。骨折阴性对照组也无显著性差异(HR, 1.175; 95% CI, 0.692-1.993; p = 0.551),证明系统健康用户混淆不存在。由于阶梯式护理治疗途径固有的结构性混淆,与未治疗患者进行正式调整比较是不可行的。结论:在这个真实世界的多样化队列中,CGRP单克隆抗体的起始治疗符合预先设定的IS + TIA主要结局相对于肉毒杆菌毒素a的非劣效性统计标准。然而,这一发现是基于少数事件和广泛的ci,应该谨慎地解释为反对事件IS + TIA风险相对增加的有限证据,而不是作为等效安全性,没有适度伤害或保护作用的确定证据。一些次要、亚组和支持性分析对非劣效性仍没有定论。需要更大的、有充分证据的比较安全性研究。
期刊介绍:
Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.