ADA assays for high-dose biologics: redefining drug tolerance through clinical insights.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Bioanalysis Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17576180.2026.2690269
Manisha Saxena, David Janik, Carsten Krantz, Annie St-Pierre, Maria Jadhav, Lydia Michaut, Florent Bender
{"title":"ADA assays for high-dose biologics: redefining drug tolerance through clinical insights.","authors":"Manisha Saxena, David Janik, Carsten Krantz, Annie St-Pierre, Maria Jadhav, Lydia Michaut, Florent Bender","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2026.2690269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays is vital in biologics development, with regulatory bodies like EMA and FDA emphasizing drug tolerance. In patient care, drug tolerance assessments should reflect actual clinical use. We developed an ADA assay for a fully human monoclonal antibody used in oncology, addressing the challenges posed by high circulating drug levels and target biology. Various assay formats were tested using multiple positive controls and drug concentrations that mimic real-world exposure and drug-to-ADA ratios. Assessing different positive controls at various concentrations was key to characterizing sensitivity and drug tolerance. An assay initially showing low drug tolerance with one monoclonal control performed adequately with others. Rather than limiting assessments to a single sensitivity level, we evaluated assay performance using clinically relevant drug and ADA concentrations. This approach ensures the assay's sensitivity and drug tolerance are meaningful for patient management and therapeutic decisions. Early and ongoing collaboration with health authorities supported alignment of clinically relevant performance criteria and interpretation strategies. Ultimately, this patient-oriented strategy guarantees ADA results that inform patient safety and treatment effectiveness for high-dose biologic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"593-605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2026.2690269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays is vital in biologics development, with regulatory bodies like EMA and FDA emphasizing drug tolerance. In patient care, drug tolerance assessments should reflect actual clinical use. We developed an ADA assay for a fully human monoclonal antibody used in oncology, addressing the challenges posed by high circulating drug levels and target biology. Various assay formats were tested using multiple positive controls and drug concentrations that mimic real-world exposure and drug-to-ADA ratios. Assessing different positive controls at various concentrations was key to characterizing sensitivity and drug tolerance. An assay initially showing low drug tolerance with one monoclonal control performed adequately with others. Rather than limiting assessments to a single sensitivity level, we evaluated assay performance using clinically relevant drug and ADA concentrations. This approach ensures the assay's sensitivity and drug tolerance are meaningful for patient management and therapeutic decisions. Early and ongoing collaboration with health authorities supported alignment of clinically relevant performance criteria and interpretation strategies. Ultimately, this patient-oriented strategy guarantees ADA results that inform patient safety and treatment effectiveness for high-dose biologic therapies.

高剂量生物制剂的ADA检测:通过临床见解重新定义药物耐受性。
抗药抗体(ADA)检测的验证在生物制剂开发中至关重要,EMA和FDA等监管机构都强调药物耐受性。在病人护理中,药物耐受性评估应反映实际的临床使用情况。我们开发了一种用于肿瘤的全人单克隆抗体的ADA检测方法,解决了高循环药物水平和靶标生物学带来的挑战。使用多种阳性对照和模拟真实世界暴露和药物- ada比率的药物浓度对各种分析格式进行了测试。评估不同浓度的阳性对照是表征敏感性和耐药性的关键。一项试验最初显示一种单克隆对照药物耐受性低,但在其他单克隆对照中表现良好。我们没有将评估限制在单一的敏感性水平上,而是使用临床相关的药物和ADA浓度来评估检测性能。这种方法确保了检测的敏感性和药物耐受性对患者管理和治疗决策有意义。与卫生当局的早期和持续合作支持了临床相关绩效标准和解释策略的统一。最终,这种以患者为导向的策略保证了ADA的结果,为高剂量生物疗法的患者安全性和治疗有效性提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书