The effectiveness of nature-based interventions on mental health: A systematic review

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Darlene Heinen-Stach, Erika Herbold, Carla L. Hendricks, Niklas Zuch, Michael A. Rapp, Michèle D. Birtel, Mira Tschorn
{"title":"The effectiveness of nature-based interventions on mental health: A systematic review","authors":"Darlene Heinen-Stach,&nbsp;Erika Herbold,&nbsp;Carla L. Hendricks,&nbsp;Niklas Zuch,&nbsp;Michael A. Rapp,&nbsp;Michèle D. Birtel,&nbsp;Mira Tschorn","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As mental health challenges continue to rise globally alongside increasing urbanization and treatment barriers, nature-based interventions (NBIs) may provide an accessible, affordable, and low-risk alternative to conventional mental health treatments. This systematic review synthesizes quantitative evidence on the impact of NBIs on mental health outcomes, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials with a nature-based intervention group and a non-nature control group, reporting at least one mental health outcome, were included. Of 10,113 identified records, 47 trials met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions involved horticultural therapy, green exercise, or nature walks. Seventeen studies reported significantly greater improvements in mental health, particularly depression, anxiety, and stress in NBI groups compared to controls. NBIs showed no evidence of inferiority to established treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy or art therapy. However, studies varied widely in design, intervention type, duration, and outcome measures, and many showed moderate to high risk of bias. While initial evidence supports the effectiveness of NBIs, future research should prioritize long-term studies, higher methodological quality, and detailed subgroup analyses to better understand the specific conditions under which NBIs are most beneficial, as well as test the added benefits of combining NBIs with established treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aphw.70164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As mental health challenges continue to rise globally alongside increasing urbanization and treatment barriers, nature-based interventions (NBIs) may provide an accessible, affordable, and low-risk alternative to conventional mental health treatments. This systematic review synthesizes quantitative evidence on the impact of NBIs on mental health outcomes, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials with a nature-based intervention group and a non-nature control group, reporting at least one mental health outcome, were included. Of 10,113 identified records, 47 trials met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions involved horticultural therapy, green exercise, or nature walks. Seventeen studies reported significantly greater improvements in mental health, particularly depression, anxiety, and stress in NBI groups compared to controls. NBIs showed no evidence of inferiority to established treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy or art therapy. However, studies varied widely in design, intervention type, duration, and outcome measures, and many showed moderate to high risk of bias. While initial evidence supports the effectiveness of NBIs, future research should prioritize long-term studies, higher methodological quality, and detailed subgroup analyses to better understand the specific conditions under which NBIs are most beneficial, as well as test the added benefits of combining NBIs with established treatments.

Abstract Image

基于自然的心理健康干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
随着城市化和治疗障碍的增加,全球精神卫生挑战不断增加,基于自然的干预措施(nbi)可能为传统的精神卫生治疗提供一种可获得、负担得起和低风险的替代方案。根据PRISMA 2020指南,本系统综述综合了nbi对心理健康结果影响的定量证据。随机对照试验包括以自然为基础的干预组和非自然对照组,报告至少一项心理健康结果。在10113份确定的记录中,47项试验符合纳入标准。大多数干预措施包括园艺疗法、绿色运动或自然散步。17项研究报告称,与对照组相比,NBI组在心理健康,尤其是抑郁、焦虑和压力方面有了更大的改善。没有证据表明nbi比认知行为疗法或艺术疗法等现有疗法低。然而,研究在设计、干预类型、持续时间和结果测量方面差异很大,许多研究显示出中度至高度的偏倚风险。虽然初步证据支持nbi的有效性,但未来的研究应优先考虑长期研究、更高的方学质量和详细的亚组分析,以更好地了解nbi最有益的具体情况,并测试nbi与现有治疗方法结合的额外益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书