Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion in the naïve T Cell Receptor Repertoire

IF 10.6 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Isabella Sodi, Matthew V. Cowley, Trupti Gore, James Henderson, Andreas Tiffeau-Mayer, Benny Chain
{"title":"Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion in the naïve T Cell Receptor Repertoire","authors":"Isabella Sodi,&nbsp;Matthew V. Cowley,&nbsp;Trupti Gore,&nbsp;James Henderson,&nbsp;Andreas Tiffeau-Mayer,&nbsp;Benny Chain","doi":"10.1111/imr.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The naïve T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire forms the immunological background from which adaptive cellular immune responses emerge. We examine the fundamental properties of the human naïve TCR repertoire through the perspective of Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion. We first consider the richness of the repertoire. A combination of experimental and computational approaches has been used to estimate that the human repertoire contains at least 100 million distinct naïve clonotypes. This estimate suggests an average size of each clonotype of 1000 T cells. However, evidence from both mathematical modeling and large-scale single-cell sequencing indicates that clonotype family sizes are very unequal, with a small subset of naïve TCRs present at substantially higher frequencies. Somatic recombination itself does not contribute significantly to this inequality, as the probability of generating an identical clonotype multiple times in an individual is very small. Instead, clonotype size is likely to be largely driven by thymic or post-thymic expansion, but the mechanisms driving heterogeneity remain poorly understood. Finally, despite clonal deletion being a cornerstone of immunological dogma, experimental evidence for functional “holes” in the naïve repertoire caused by negative thymic selection is surprisingly limited. Alternative tolerance mechanisms, including regulatory T cells and T cell quorum sensing, are likely to play important roles. This review highlights the need for further research to identify the mechanisms that shape the frequency distribution of naïve TCR clone sizes and to define its impact on primary immune responses. Further research is also needed to understand the role of quorum sensing in maintaining T cell tolerance, while avoiding potential vulnerabilities arising from extensive ‘holes’ in the TCR repertoire.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"340 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imr.70138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The naïve T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire forms the immunological background from which adaptive cellular immune responses emerge. We examine the fundamental properties of the human naïve TCR repertoire through the perspective of Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion. We first consider the richness of the repertoire. A combination of experimental and computational approaches has been used to estimate that the human repertoire contains at least 100 million distinct naïve clonotypes. This estimate suggests an average size of each clonotype of 1000 T cells. However, evidence from both mathematical modeling and large-scale single-cell sequencing indicates that clonotype family sizes are very unequal, with a small subset of naïve TCRs present at substantially higher frequencies. Somatic recombination itself does not contribute significantly to this inequality, as the probability of generating an identical clonotype multiple times in an individual is very small. Instead, clonotype size is likely to be largely driven by thymic or post-thymic expansion, but the mechanisms driving heterogeneity remain poorly understood. Finally, despite clonal deletion being a cornerstone of immunological dogma, experimental evidence for functional “holes” in the naïve repertoire caused by negative thymic selection is surprisingly limited. Alternative tolerance mechanisms, including regulatory T cells and T cell quorum sensing, are likely to play important roles. This review highlights the need for further research to identify the mechanisms that shape the frequency distribution of naïve TCR clone sizes and to define its impact on primary immune responses. Further research is also needed to understand the role of quorum sensing in maintaining T cell tolerance, while avoiding potential vulnerabilities arising from extensive ‘holes’ in the TCR repertoire.

Abstract Image

naïve T细胞受体库的多样性、平等性和包容性。
naïve T细胞受体(TCR)库形成了适应性细胞免疫反应出现的免疫背景。我们通过多样性、平等和包容的视角来研究人类naïve TCR的基本属性。我们首先考虑剧目的丰富性。实验和计算方法的结合已被用来估计人类的曲目包含至少1亿个不同的naïve克隆型。这一估计表明每种克隆型的平均大小为1000个T细胞。然而,来自数学模型和大规模单细胞测序的证据表明,克隆型家族大小是非常不平等的,naïve tcr的一小部分以更高的频率存在。体细胞重组本身对这种不平等没有显著贡献,因为在一个个体中多次产生相同克隆型的可能性非常小。相反,克隆型大小可能主要由胸腺或胸腺后扩张驱动,但驱动异质性的机制仍然知之甚少。最后,尽管克隆缺失是免疫学教条的基石,但实验证据表明,由阴性胸腺选择引起的naïve曲目中的功能“孔”非常有限。其他耐受机制,包括调节性T细胞和T细胞群体感应,可能发挥重要作用。这篇综述强调需要进一步研究,以确定形成naïve TCR克隆大小频率分布的机制,并确定其对原发性免疫反应的影响。还需要进一步的研究来了解群体感应在维持T细胞耐受性中的作用,同时避免由于TCR库中广泛的“漏洞”而产生的潜在漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunological Reviews
Immunological Reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Immunological Reviews is a specialized journal that focuses on various aspects of immunological research. It encompasses a wide range of topics, such as clinical immunology, experimental immunology, and investigations related to allergy and the immune system. The journal follows a unique approach where each volume is dedicated solely to a specific area of immunological research. However, collectively, these volumes aim to offer an extensive and up-to-date overview of the latest advancements in basic immunology and their practical implications in clinical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书