Wenting Geng, Man Li, Chaoning Wang, Yan Wang, Lujun Shen, Xinhua Yang, Chunping Yan
{"title":"The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.","authors":"Wenting Geng, Man Li, Chaoning Wang, Yan Wang, Lujun Shen, Xinhua Yang, Chunping Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00426-026-02339-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has explored the effects of retrieval practice on intentional emotional memory; however, its impact on incidentally encoded emotional memories remains unclear. To investigate this question, this study employed a three-phase retrieval practice paradigm, in which participants were asked to evaluate the emotional valence of emotional or neutral images. Behavioral results showed that, compared to restudy, retrieval practice significantly enhanced recognition accuracy for negative items, but significantly reduced recognition of positive items during the final test. Event-Related Potentials (ERP) findings further supported this pattern. A significant ERP retrieval practice effect (reflected by significantly larger ERP amplitude for retrieval-practiced items than restudied ones) was observed over the parietal area between 800 and 1000 ms for negative images. In contrast, a reversed ERP retrieval practice effect (reflected by significantly larger ERP amplitude for restudied items than retrieval-practiced ones) was found for positive images between 300 and 800 ms across frontal, central, and parietal areas during the final test. These findings suggest that, in the context of incidental memory, retrieval practice (compared to restudy) tends to enhance the recognition of negative images while impairing the recognition of positive ones. This emotional modulation of the retrieval practice effect may be influenced by the nature of the encoding task.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"90 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-026-02339-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous research has explored the effects of retrieval practice on intentional emotional memory; however, its impact on incidentally encoded emotional memories remains unclear. To investigate this question, this study employed a three-phase retrieval practice paradigm, in which participants were asked to evaluate the emotional valence of emotional or neutral images. Behavioral results showed that, compared to restudy, retrieval practice significantly enhanced recognition accuracy for negative items, but significantly reduced recognition of positive items during the final test. Event-Related Potentials (ERP) findings further supported this pattern. A significant ERP retrieval practice effect (reflected by significantly larger ERP amplitude for retrieval-practiced items than restudied ones) was observed over the parietal area between 800 and 1000 ms for negative images. In contrast, a reversed ERP retrieval practice effect (reflected by significantly larger ERP amplitude for restudied items than retrieval-practiced ones) was found for positive images between 300 and 800 ms across frontal, central, and parietal areas during the final test. These findings suggest that, in the context of incidental memory, retrieval practice (compared to restudy) tends to enhance the recognition of negative images while impairing the recognition of positive ones. This emotional modulation of the retrieval practice effect may be influenced by the nature of the encoding task.
期刊介绍:
Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.