Epidemiological characteristics of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis: a 40-year retrospective prevalence study.

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Freddy Villanueva-Cotrina, Vilma Bejar, Víctor Raul Huaman-Cardenas, Katherine Yauri Condor, Jose Guevara
{"title":"Epidemiological characteristics of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis: a 40-year retrospective prevalence study.","authors":"Freddy Villanueva-Cotrina, Vilma Bejar, Víctor Raul Huaman-Cardenas, Katherine Yauri Condor, Jose Guevara","doi":"10.1186/s40249-026-01469-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dermatophytosis is commonly caused by anthropophilic or zoophilic fungi. Although factors related to the disease onset have been identified, it is unclear whether these factors influence disease prevalence differently depending on the fungus's ecological niche. Our study aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of dermatophytosis caused by anthropophilic versus zoophilic agents. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study (1976-2015) including confirmed cases of dermatophytosis diagnosed by positive mycological cultures in patients treated at the Institute of Tropical Medicine \"Daniel Alcides Carrion\"-National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Demographic and microbiological data were collected. We used the Chi-square test to evaluate differences in the prevalence of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis across the variables of interest. A total of 4961 cases of dermatophytosis were diagnosed. Anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in adults, primarily due to Trichophyton rubrum (92.19%) and T. interdigitale (94.16%) (P < 0.001). In contrast, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in children, primarily due to Microsporum canis (64.24%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea unguium due to T. rubrum (61.49%) and T. interdigitale (62.12%), as well as in tinea pedis due to T. interdigitale (37.88%) (P < 0.001). Conversely, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea capitis due to M. canis (54.88%), as well as in tinea manum and tinea corporis due to T. mentagrophytes (25.71% and 37.71%, respectively) (P < 0.001). According to its ecology, dermatophytosis was related to the age group affected, the clinical form presentation, and a specific etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13321655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-026-01469-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dermatophytosis is commonly caused by anthropophilic or zoophilic fungi. Although factors related to the disease onset have been identified, it is unclear whether these factors influence disease prevalence differently depending on the fungus's ecological niche. Our study aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of dermatophytosis caused by anthropophilic versus zoophilic agents. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study (1976-2015) including confirmed cases of dermatophytosis diagnosed by positive mycological cultures in patients treated at the Institute of Tropical Medicine "Daniel Alcides Carrion"-National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Demographic and microbiological data were collected. We used the Chi-square test to evaluate differences in the prevalence of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis across the variables of interest. A total of 4961 cases of dermatophytosis were diagnosed. Anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in adults, primarily due to Trichophyton rubrum (92.19%) and T. interdigitale (94.16%) (P < 0.001). In contrast, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in children, primarily due to Microsporum canis (64.24%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea unguium due to T. rubrum (61.49%) and T. interdigitale (62.12%), as well as in tinea pedis due to T. interdigitale (37.88%) (P < 0.001). Conversely, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea capitis due to M. canis (54.88%), as well as in tinea manum and tinea corporis due to T. mentagrophytes (25.71% and 37.71%, respectively) (P < 0.001). According to its ecology, dermatophytosis was related to the age group affected, the clinical form presentation, and a specific etiology.

嗜人性和嗜兽性皮肤癣的流行病学特征:一项40年回顾性流行病学研究。
皮肤真菌病通常是由嗜人或嗜动物真菌引起的。虽然已经确定了与疾病发病相关的因素,但尚不清楚这些因素是否会根据真菌的生态位不同而不同地影响疾病的流行。我们的研究旨在确定由嗜人因子与嗜动物因子引起的皮肤癣的流行病学特征。我们进行了一项回顾性描述性研究(1976-2015),包括在秘鲁利马圣马科斯国立大学“Daniel Alcides Carrion”热带医学研究所接受治疗的患者中通过真菌学培养阳性诊断的确诊皮肤真菌病病例。收集了人口统计学和微生物学数据。我们使用卡方检验来评估在感兴趣的变量中嗜人性和嗜动物性皮肤癣患病率的差异。共诊断皮肤癣4961例。成人嗜人性皮癣最常见,主要由红毛癣(92.19%)和指间毛癣(94.16%)引起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书