{"title":"Epidemiological characteristics of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis: a 40-year retrospective prevalence study.","authors":"Freddy Villanueva-Cotrina, Vilma Bejar, Víctor Raul Huaman-Cardenas, Katherine Yauri Condor, Jose Guevara","doi":"10.1186/s40249-026-01469-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dermatophytosis is commonly caused by anthropophilic or zoophilic fungi. Although factors related to the disease onset have been identified, it is unclear whether these factors influence disease prevalence differently depending on the fungus's ecological niche. Our study aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of dermatophytosis caused by anthropophilic versus zoophilic agents. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study (1976-2015) including confirmed cases of dermatophytosis diagnosed by positive mycological cultures in patients treated at the Institute of Tropical Medicine \"Daniel Alcides Carrion\"-National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Demographic and microbiological data were collected. We used the Chi-square test to evaluate differences in the prevalence of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis across the variables of interest. A total of 4961 cases of dermatophytosis were diagnosed. Anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in adults, primarily due to Trichophyton rubrum (92.19%) and T. interdigitale (94.16%) (P < 0.001). In contrast, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in children, primarily due to Microsporum canis (64.24%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea unguium due to T. rubrum (61.49%) and T. interdigitale (62.12%), as well as in tinea pedis due to T. interdigitale (37.88%) (P < 0.001). Conversely, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea capitis due to M. canis (54.88%), as well as in tinea manum and tinea corporis due to T. mentagrophytes (25.71% and 37.71%, respectively) (P < 0.001). According to its ecology, dermatophytosis was related to the age group affected, the clinical form presentation, and a specific etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13321655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-026-01469-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dermatophytosis is commonly caused by anthropophilic or zoophilic fungi. Although factors related to the disease onset have been identified, it is unclear whether these factors influence disease prevalence differently depending on the fungus's ecological niche. Our study aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of dermatophytosis caused by anthropophilic versus zoophilic agents. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study (1976-2015) including confirmed cases of dermatophytosis diagnosed by positive mycological cultures in patients treated at the Institute of Tropical Medicine "Daniel Alcides Carrion"-National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Demographic and microbiological data were collected. We used the Chi-square test to evaluate differences in the prevalence of anthropophilic and zoophilic dermatophytosis across the variables of interest. A total of 4961 cases of dermatophytosis were diagnosed. Anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in adults, primarily due to Trichophyton rubrum (92.19%) and T. interdigitale (94.16%) (P < 0.001). In contrast, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in children, primarily due to Microsporum canis (64.24%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, anthropophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea unguium due to T. rubrum (61.49%) and T. interdigitale (62.12%), as well as in tinea pedis due to T. interdigitale (37.88%) (P < 0.001). Conversely, zoophilic dermatophytosis was most prevalent in tinea capitis due to M. canis (54.88%), as well as in tinea manum and tinea corporis due to T. mentagrophytes (25.71% and 37.71%, respectively) (P < 0.001). According to its ecology, dermatophytosis was related to the age group affected, the clinical form presentation, and a specific etiology.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.