Clinicopathological Correlation of BI-RADS FAC 4 Breast Lesions: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in South India.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1007/s13193-025-02435-0
Paul Augustine, Dinesh Manchikanti, Rexeena V Bhargavan, Jagannath Krishna K M, Anitha Sen, Kurian Cherian
{"title":"Clinicopathological Correlation of BI-RADS FAC 4 Breast Lesions: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in South India.","authors":"Paul Augustine, Dinesh Manchikanti, Rexeena V Bhargavan, Jagannath Krishna K M, Anitha Sen, Kurian Cherian","doi":"10.1007/s13193-025-02435-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is commonly used to assess breast lesions, with category 4 suggesting a suspicious lesion with malignancy risk ranging from 2%-95%. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of BI-RADS FAC (Final Assessment Criteria) 4 lesions and its subcategories. This is a retrospective analysis of 230 women with BI-RADS FAC 4 lesions detected on mammography and /or ultrasound at a South Indian tertiary centre over a 3-year period. Demographic, clinical, radiological features were correlated with histopathological data. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of BI-RADS 4 lesions and its subcategories were calculated. Of 230 women, with BI-RADS-FAC 4 lesions in the study population, 26.9% were malignant. PPVs of BI-RADS FAC 4A lesions was 18.7%, 4B lesions was 27.6% and 4C lesions was 50.0%. Patients with a prior history of breast cancer had a malignancy rate of 34.9% for BI-RADS 4 lesions. In comparison, patients without a prior history of breast cancer had a malignancy rate of 21.5%. This difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.001). BI-RADS FAC 4A PPV exceeded typical lexicon values of 2 to 10% risk of malignancy. There was no significant correlation between age, menopausal status, palpability and, BI-RADS FAC 4 sub-category. The risk of malignancy in BI-RADS FAC 4 lesions in our Indian population is high especially if there is a history of breast cancer. There should be a high index of suspicion for malignancy with appropriate surgical intervention in all patients with BI-RADS FAC 4 lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"17 6","pages":"1403-1408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13315067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-025-02435-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is commonly used to assess breast lesions, with category 4 suggesting a suspicious lesion with malignancy risk ranging from 2%-95%. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of BI-RADS FAC (Final Assessment Criteria) 4 lesions and its subcategories. This is a retrospective analysis of 230 women with BI-RADS FAC 4 lesions detected on mammography and /or ultrasound at a South Indian tertiary centre over a 3-year period. Demographic, clinical, radiological features were correlated with histopathological data. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of BI-RADS 4 lesions and its subcategories were calculated. Of 230 women, with BI-RADS-FAC 4 lesions in the study population, 26.9% were malignant. PPVs of BI-RADS FAC 4A lesions was 18.7%, 4B lesions was 27.6% and 4C lesions was 50.0%. Patients with a prior history of breast cancer had a malignancy rate of 34.9% for BI-RADS 4 lesions. In comparison, patients without a prior history of breast cancer had a malignancy rate of 21.5%. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). BI-RADS FAC 4A PPV exceeded typical lexicon values of 2 to 10% risk of malignancy. There was no significant correlation between age, menopausal status, palpability and, BI-RADS FAC 4 sub-category. The risk of malignancy in BI-RADS FAC 4 lesions in our Indian population is high especially if there is a history of breast cancer. There should be a high index of suspicion for malignancy with appropriate surgical intervention in all patients with BI-RADS FAC 4 lesions.

BI-RADS FAC 4乳腺病变的临床病理相关性:来自印度南部三级癌症中心的回顾性研究
乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)通常用于评估乳腺病变,4级提示可疑病变,恶性风险在2%-95%之间。本研究旨在评估BI-RADS FAC(最终评估标准)4种病变及其亚分类的预测准确性。本研究回顾性分析了南印度三级医疗中心在3年内通过乳房x光检查和/或超声检查发现BI-RADS FAC 4病变的230名妇女。人口统计学、临床、放射学特征与组织病理学数据相关。计算BI-RADS 4型病变及其亚类的阳性预测值(Positive Predictive Value, PPV)。在研究人群中,230名患有BI-RADS-FAC 4病变的女性中,26.9%为恶性。BI-RADS FAC 4A病变的PPVs为18.7%,4B病变为27.6%,4C病变为50.0%。既往有乳腺癌病史的患者BI-RADS 4病变的恶性率为34.9%。相比之下,没有乳腺癌病史的患者的恶性肿瘤发生率为21.5%。差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。BI-RADS FAC 4A PPV超过典型词典值2 - 10%的恶性风险。年龄、绝经状态、触感与BI-RADS FAC 4亚分类之间无显著相关性。在我们的印度人群中,BI-RADS FAC 4病变发生恶性肿瘤的风险很高,特别是如果有乳腺癌病史。所有BI-RADS FAC 4病变患者应高度怀疑恶性肿瘤并采取适当的手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书