Catheter architecture as a determinant of cerebrospinal fluid flow in pediatric hydrocephalus.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Christopher W Roberts, Brandon G Rocque, Leopold Arko Iv, Neena I Marupudi, Sandeep Sood, Andrew Jea, Elliot Widd, Bryn A Martin, Carolyn A Harris
{"title":"Catheter architecture as a determinant of cerebrospinal fluid flow in pediatric hydrocephalus.","authors":"Christopher W Roberts, Brandon G Rocque, Leopold Arko Iv, Neena I Marupudi, Sandeep Sood, Andrew Jea, Elliot Widd, Bryn A Martin, Carolyn A Harris","doi":"10.1186/s12987-026-00834-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral ventricular catheters (VCs) remain the critical but failure-prone component of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt systems for pediatric hydrocephalus, with proximal obstruction accounting for most malfunctions. Several catheter geometries have been introduced to the market in the US alone, yet none demonstrate long-term reliability. This study investigates how catheter design interacts with patient-specific ventricular anatomy and surgical placement to influence CSF drainage patterns. Three patient-specific hydrocephalic ventricles were modeled from MRI scans, with FOHR values of 0.45, 0.30, and 0.29 and corresponding ventricular volumes of 167.5 (enlarged), 12.5 (moderate), and 20.6 mL (small). Four ventricular catheters with varying architectures from our institutional biobank were reverse engineered using confocal microscopy. Catheters were virtually implanted into the lateral ventricles under frontal, parietal, and occipital placements. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed, and mass flow rates were quantified across drainage holes grouped into longitudinal segments. Boundary conditions consisted of a constant CSF efflux rate of 0.35 mL/min applied uniformly across all configurations and a continuous pressure outlet at the proximal catheter outlet, representing valveless drainage. Occipital placement consistently produced valve adjacent dominant inflow across catheter designs, whereas frontal and parietal placements exhibited design-specific flow behaviors when segmental inflow through the catheter drainage holes was measured. In most configurations, segments nearest the catheter valve captured the majority of inflow, accounting for 65-82% of total CSF entry. In frontal placements, smaller ventricular geometries caused valve-adjacent segments in several catheter designs to extend outside the ventricular cavity. As a result, inflow was redistributed toward the remaining tip-adjacent segments, with up to 99.5% of total flow entering through these segments when valve-adjacent holes were excluded. Catheter designs with shorter perforated lengths and more closely spaced drainage holes maintained a greater number of functionally active segments across ventricular geometries, whereas longer perforated spans were more susceptible to anatomical exclusion. These findings demonstrate that ventricular catheter drainage is governed not by catheter geometry alone, but by the interaction between catheter architecture, ventricular morphology, and surgical placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12321,"journal":{"name":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-026-00834-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebral ventricular catheters (VCs) remain the critical but failure-prone component of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt systems for pediatric hydrocephalus, with proximal obstruction accounting for most malfunctions. Several catheter geometries have been introduced to the market in the US alone, yet none demonstrate long-term reliability. This study investigates how catheter design interacts with patient-specific ventricular anatomy and surgical placement to influence CSF drainage patterns. Three patient-specific hydrocephalic ventricles were modeled from MRI scans, with FOHR values of 0.45, 0.30, and 0.29 and corresponding ventricular volumes of 167.5 (enlarged), 12.5 (moderate), and 20.6 mL (small). Four ventricular catheters with varying architectures from our institutional biobank were reverse engineered using confocal microscopy. Catheters were virtually implanted into the lateral ventricles under frontal, parietal, and occipital placements. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed, and mass flow rates were quantified across drainage holes grouped into longitudinal segments. Boundary conditions consisted of a constant CSF efflux rate of 0.35 mL/min applied uniformly across all configurations and a continuous pressure outlet at the proximal catheter outlet, representing valveless drainage. Occipital placement consistently produced valve adjacent dominant inflow across catheter designs, whereas frontal and parietal placements exhibited design-specific flow behaviors when segmental inflow through the catheter drainage holes was measured. In most configurations, segments nearest the catheter valve captured the majority of inflow, accounting for 65-82% of total CSF entry. In frontal placements, smaller ventricular geometries caused valve-adjacent segments in several catheter designs to extend outside the ventricular cavity. As a result, inflow was redistributed toward the remaining tip-adjacent segments, with up to 99.5% of total flow entering through these segments when valve-adjacent holes were excluded. Catheter designs with shorter perforated lengths and more closely spaced drainage holes maintained a greater number of functionally active segments across ventricular geometries, whereas longer perforated spans were more susceptible to anatomical exclusion. These findings demonstrate that ventricular catheter drainage is governed not by catheter geometry alone, but by the interaction between catheter architecture, ventricular morphology, and surgical placement.

导管结构作为儿童脑积水脑脊液流动的决定因素。
脑室导管(VCs)仍然是脑脊液(CSF)分流系统治疗小儿脑积水的关键但容易失效的组成部分,近端梗阻是大多数故障的原因。仅在美国市场上就有几种导管几何形状,但没有一种具有长期可靠性。本研究探讨导管设计如何与患者特定的心室解剖结构和手术放置相互作用以影响脑脊液引流模式。通过MRI扫描建立3个患者特异性脑积水脑室模型,FOHR值分别为0.45、0.30和0.29,相应的脑室容积分别为167.5(增大)、12.5(中等)和20.6 mL(小)。使用共聚焦显微镜对来自我们机构生物库的四根不同结构的心室导管进行反向工程。导管在侧脑室的额部、顶叶和枕部植入。进行了计算流体动力学模拟,并量化了各排水孔的质量流量。边界条件包括恒定的CSF流出率0.35 mL/min,均匀应用于所有配置,在导管近端出口有连续压力出口,代表无阀引流。枕部放置始终在导管设计中产生瓣膜邻近的主导流入,而额部和顶叶放置在测量通过导管引流孔的节段流入时表现出设计特定的流动行为。在大多数配置中,最靠近导管阀的段捕获了大部分流入,占CSF总流入的65-82%。在前部放置时,较小的心室几何形状导致几种导管设计中的瓣膜邻近节段延伸到心室腔外。因此,流入被重新分配到剩余的顶端邻近段,当排除阀门邻近孔时,流入这些段的总流量高达99.5%。具有较短穿孔长度和更紧密引流孔的导管设计在心室几何形状上保持了更多的功能活动节段,而较长的穿孔跨度更容易发生解剖排斥。这些发现表明,心室导管引流不仅受导管几何形状的影响,还受导管结构、心室形态和手术位置之间的相互作用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: "Fluids and Barriers of the CNS" is a scholarly open access journal that specializes in the intricate world of the central nervous system's fluids and barriers, which are pivotal for the health and well-being of the human body. This journal is a peer-reviewed platform that welcomes research manuscripts exploring the full spectrum of CNS fluids and barriers, with a particular focus on their roles in both health and disease. At the heart of this journal's interest is the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a vital fluid that circulates within the brain and spinal cord, playing a multifaceted role in the normal functioning of the brain and in various neurological conditions. The journal delves into the composition, circulation, and absorption of CSF, as well as its relationship with the parenchymal interstitial fluid and the neurovascular unit at the blood-brain barrier (BBB).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书