Evaluation of an application for investments in cataract surgery, Ethiopia.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-29 DOI:10.2471/BLT.25.293592
Dominque Geoffrion, Noelle Whitestone, Jennifer L Patnaik, Samson Tesfaye, Dawit Seyum, Nigusie Fetene, Enock Nsokolo, Lucia Nadaf, Ruth Nswana, Alemayehu Sisay, David H Cherwek, Serge Resnikoff, Phylis Moonga, Jonathan Ncheengamwa, Nathan Congdon
{"title":"Evaluation of an application for investments in cataract surgery, Ethiopia.","authors":"Dominque Geoffrion, Noelle Whitestone, Jennifer L Patnaik, Samson Tesfaye, Dawit Seyum, Nigusie Fetene, Enock Nsokolo, Lucia Nadaf, Ruth Nswana, Alemayehu Sisay, David H Cherwek, Serge Resnikoff, Phylis Moonga, Jonathan Ncheengamwa, Nathan Congdon","doi":"10.2471/BLT.25.293592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>The World Health Organization recommends a benchmark for uncorrected visual acuity of ≥ 6/12 in 80% of patients at 4 to 6 weeks following cataract surgery. In low-resource countries, reaching this benchmark is challenging and assessing progress is difficult.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>This intervention involved modest investments recommended by the Better Operative Outcome Software Tool (BOOST) application (app). The investments targeted specific causes of poor cataract surgery results at hospitals in Ethiopia to improve vision outcomes. Fifteen ophthalmic surgeons from 11 public secondary and tertiary eye care centres in five regional Ethiopian states collected pre-intervention data using the BOOST app. Based on 20 consecutive patients with vision < 6/60, BOOST identified case selection, intraoperative complications or postoperative refractive error as the leading causes of poor outcomes. Each facility then invested 2500 United States dollars (US$) to target its leading cause, recorded outcomes for 60 consecutive cataract patients, and then compared the proportion with uncorrected vision ≥ 6/12 before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Local setting: </strong>All 11 centres are Orbis International partners and services provided at the facilities are highly subsidized or free of charge.</p><p><strong>Relevant changes: </strong>After implementing targeted interventions at the facilities to address undetected ocular comorbidity, surgical complications or postoperative refractive errors, 501 (56.0%) of 894 patients had good results (≥ 6/12), compared to 289 (32.2%) of 897 patients before the intervention.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>Using the BOOST app as an approach for quality monitoring and improvement enables benchmarking across contexts and can enhance surgical outcomes when paired with recommended targeted investments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"104 7","pages":"505-510"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13318370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.25.293592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: The World Health Organization recommends a benchmark for uncorrected visual acuity of ≥ 6/12 in 80% of patients at 4 to 6 weeks following cataract surgery. In low-resource countries, reaching this benchmark is challenging and assessing progress is difficult.

Approach: This intervention involved modest investments recommended by the Better Operative Outcome Software Tool (BOOST) application (app). The investments targeted specific causes of poor cataract surgery results at hospitals in Ethiopia to improve vision outcomes. Fifteen ophthalmic surgeons from 11 public secondary and tertiary eye care centres in five regional Ethiopian states collected pre-intervention data using the BOOST app. Based on 20 consecutive patients with vision < 6/60, BOOST identified case selection, intraoperative complications or postoperative refractive error as the leading causes of poor outcomes. Each facility then invested 2500 United States dollars (US$) to target its leading cause, recorded outcomes for 60 consecutive cataract patients, and then compared the proportion with uncorrected vision ≥ 6/12 before and after the intervention.

Local setting: All 11 centres are Orbis International partners and services provided at the facilities are highly subsidized or free of charge.

Relevant changes: After implementing targeted interventions at the facilities to address undetected ocular comorbidity, surgical complications or postoperative refractive errors, 501 (56.0%) of 894 patients had good results (≥ 6/12), compared to 289 (32.2%) of 897 patients before the intervention.

Lessons learnt: Using the BOOST app as an approach for quality monitoring and improvement enables benchmarking across contexts and can enhance surgical outcomes when paired with recommended targeted investments.

埃塞俄比亚,对白内障手术投资申请的评估。
问题:世界卫生组织建议在白内障手术后4 - 6周,80%的患者未矫正视力的基准≥6/12。在资源匮乏的国家,达到这一基准具有挑战性,评估进展也很困难。方法:该干预包括较好手术预后软件工具(BOOST)应用程序(app)推荐的适度投资。这些投资针对埃塞俄比亚医院白内障手术效果不佳的具体原因,以改善视力。来自埃塞俄比亚5个州的11个公立二级和三级眼科护理中心的15名眼科医生使用BOOST应用程序收集了干预前数据。基于连续20名视力正常的患者。当地环境:所有11个中心都是奥比斯国际合作伙伴,提供的服务都是高补贴或免费的。相关变化:在实施有针对性的干预措施以解决未被发现的眼部合并症、手术并发症或术后屈光不正后,894例患者中有501例(56.0%)获得了良好的结果(≥6/12),而干预前897例患者中有289例(32.2%)获得了良好的结果。经验教训:使用BOOST应用程序作为质量监测和改进的方法,可以在不同情况下进行基准测试,并与推荐的目标投资相结合,可以提高手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书