Inefficacy of a novel osmotic associative learning assay in C. elegans.

IF 1.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jin Hua Li, Kaiden H Price, Michael N Nitabach
{"title":"Inefficacy of a novel osmotic associative learning assay in C. elegans.","authors":"Jin Hua Li, Kaiden H Price, Michael N Nitabach","doi":"10.1186/s13104-026-07928-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we developed and tested a novel osmotic associative assay for facilitating the study of associative learning circuits with constrained sensory inputs in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyperosmolarity, the unconditioned stimulus, was paired with benzaldehyde, an attractive odorant here used as a conditioned stimulus, in order to train an association between hyperosmolarity and odor. It was hypothesized that animals conditioned in hyperosmotic conditions for 90 min would show reduced chemotaxis to benzaldehyde compared to control animals. Results suggest that, following exposure to a hyperosmolar 500mM fructose solution, C. elegans chemotaxis to benzaldehyde was impaired. At more moderate hyperosmolarity, worms failed to learn to associate hyperosmolarity with benzaldehyde - i.e., there was no difference between chemotaxis index values of conditioned and naive worms in any of the fructose concentrations. Thus, our results both suggest that 90-minute associative learning assays in C. elegans may not succeed with hyperosmolarity as an unconditioned stimulus, and provide a cautionary note that researchers using hyperosmotic solutions in worm behavior assays should be cognizant of potential effects on naïve chemotaxis behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13587300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07928-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we developed and tested a novel osmotic associative assay for facilitating the study of associative learning circuits with constrained sensory inputs in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans).

Results: Hyperosmolarity, the unconditioned stimulus, was paired with benzaldehyde, an attractive odorant here used as a conditioned stimulus, in order to train an association between hyperosmolarity and odor. It was hypothesized that animals conditioned in hyperosmotic conditions for 90 min would show reduced chemotaxis to benzaldehyde compared to control animals. Results suggest that, following exposure to a hyperosmolar 500mM fructose solution, C. elegans chemotaxis to benzaldehyde was impaired. At more moderate hyperosmolarity, worms failed to learn to associate hyperosmolarity with benzaldehyde - i.e., there was no difference between chemotaxis index values of conditioned and naive worms in any of the fructose concentrations. Thus, our results both suggest that 90-minute associative learning assays in C. elegans may not succeed with hyperosmolarity as an unconditioned stimulus, and provide a cautionary note that researchers using hyperosmotic solutions in worm behavior assays should be cognizant of potential effects on naïve chemotaxis behavior.

一种新的渗透联想学习试验在秀丽隐杆线虫中的无效。
目的:在这项研究中,我们开发并测试了一种新的渗透联想试验,以促进对秀丽隐杆线虫(C. elegans)在受限感觉输入下的联想学习回路的研究。结果:高渗透压作为无条件刺激,与苯甲醛(一种有吸引力的气味剂)作为条件刺激配对,以培养高渗透压与气味之间的联系。据推测,与对照动物相比,处于高渗条件下90分钟的动物对苯甲醛的趋化性降低。结果表明,暴露于500mM高渗透性果糖溶液后,秀丽隐杆线虫对苯甲醛的趋化性受损。在更适度的高渗透压下,蠕虫无法学会将高渗透压与苯甲醛联系起来——也就是说,在任何果糖浓度下,条件蠕虫和原始蠕虫的趋化指数值都没有差异。因此,我们的研究结果都表明,在秀丽隐杆线虫中,90分钟的联想学习实验可能无法在高渗透压作为无条件刺激的情况下成功,并提供了一个警告,即在蠕虫行为实验中使用高渗透压溶液的研究人员应该认识到对naïve趋化行为的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书