Provision of medication prescription in a fracture liaison service did not diminish during COVID

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Joanna E. M. Sale, Alan Yang, Anum Ali, Ravi Jain, Jennifer Weldon, Larry Funnell, Lynn Meadows, Victoria Elliot-Gibson, Earl Bogoch
{"title":"Provision of medication prescription in a fracture liaison service did not diminish during COVID","authors":"Joanna E. M. Sale,&nbsp;Alan Yang,&nbsp;Anum Ali,&nbsp;Ravi Jain,&nbsp;Jennifer Weldon,&nbsp;Larry Funnell,&nbsp;Lynn Meadows,&nbsp;Victoria Elliot-Gibson,&nbsp;Earl Bogoch","doi":"10.1007/s11657-026-01730-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>\n <i>Summary</i>\n </h3><p>We examined the association of COVID time periods and equity-related variables with pharmacotherapy in a large jurisdiction fracture liaison service (FLS). We did not observe a significant association between COVID time periods and medication prescription after adjusting for all covariates. This highlights another potential success of the FLS model.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Our objective was to examine the impact of COVID on bone-active medication prescription in a fracture liaison service (FLS), after adjusting for fracture risk status and equity-related variables.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a logistic regression analysis with medication prescription (prescription by a bone health specialist or primary care provider) as the outcome. The model included covariates COVID time periods (T1: “pre-COVID” (<i>n</i> = 2796); T2: “during COVID” (<i>n</i> = 1575); T3: “COVID recovery” (<i>n</i> = 2208)), fracture risk status (high risk/not high risk) and equity-related variables (sex, age, marital status, living arrangement, education status, geographic location, and presence of comorbidities). Goodness of fit was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer and Lemeshow test.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Fracture risk status was the primary driver of treatment with high-risk patients 7.8 times more likely to receive a medication prescription compared to patients who were not high risk, after adjusting for all covariates (OR = 7.80 [95% CI 6.91, 8.79]). COVID time period was not statistically significant. Female patients, those married or in a common-law relationship, living alone, or residing in urban areas were more likely to be prescribed medication. The model had good prediction power and fit the data well (AUC: 0.77; Hosmer–Lemeshow test <i>p</i>-value: 0.83).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients reached by the FLS, COVID time period was not significantly associated with medication prescription, although program reach decreased at T2 and T3. Fracture risk status, sex, marital status, living arrangement, and geographic location were significantly associated with medication prescription.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-026-01730-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

We examined the association of COVID time periods and equity-related variables with pharmacotherapy in a large jurisdiction fracture liaison service (FLS). We did not observe a significant association between COVID time periods and medication prescription after adjusting for all covariates. This highlights another potential success of the FLS model.

Purpose

Our objective was to examine the impact of COVID on bone-active medication prescription in a fracture liaison service (FLS), after adjusting for fracture risk status and equity-related variables.

Methods

We conducted a logistic regression analysis with medication prescription (prescription by a bone health specialist or primary care provider) as the outcome. The model included covariates COVID time periods (T1: “pre-COVID” (n = 2796); T2: “during COVID” (n = 1575); T3: “COVID recovery” (n = 2208)), fracture risk status (high risk/not high risk) and equity-related variables (sex, age, marital status, living arrangement, education status, geographic location, and presence of comorbidities). Goodness of fit was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer and Lemeshow test.

Results

Fracture risk status was the primary driver of treatment with high-risk patients 7.8 times more likely to receive a medication prescription compared to patients who were not high risk, after adjusting for all covariates (OR = 7.80 [95% CI 6.91, 8.79]). COVID time period was not statistically significant. Female patients, those married or in a common-law relationship, living alone, or residing in urban areas were more likely to be prescribed medication. The model had good prediction power and fit the data well (AUC: 0.77; Hosmer–Lemeshow test p-value: 0.83).

Conclusion

Among patients reached by the FLS, COVID time period was not significantly associated with medication prescription, although program reach decreased at T2 and T3. Fracture risk status, sex, marital status, living arrangement, and geographic location were significantly associated with medication prescription.

Abstract Image

在COVID期间,骨折联络服务中提供的药物处方并未减少。
我们在一个大辖区的骨折联络服务(FLS)中研究了COVID时间段和股权相关变量与药物治疗的关系。在调整所有协变量后,我们没有观察到COVID时间段和药物处方之间的显着关联。这凸显了FLS模式的另一个潜在成功。目的:我们的目的是在调整骨折风险状态和公平相关变量后,研究COVID对骨折联络服务(FLS)中骨活性药物处方的影响。方法:我们以药物处方(由骨骼健康专家或初级保健提供者开具的处方)为结果进行logistic回归分析。该模型包括协变量COVID时间段(T1:“pre-COVID”(n = 2796);T2:“COVID期间”(n = 1575);T3:“COVID恢复”(n = 2208))、骨折风险状况(高风险/非高风险)和公平相关变量(性别、年龄、婚姻状况、居住安排、教育状况、地理位置和是否存在合并症)。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和Hosmer和Lemeshow检验评估拟合优度。结果:在调整所有协变量后,骨折风险状态是高危患者接受药物处方的主要驱动因素,其接受药物处方的可能性是非高危患者的7.8倍(OR = 7.80 [95% CI 6.91, 8.79])。COVID时间段无统计学意义。女性患者、已婚或同居、独居或居住在城市地区的患者更有可能得到处方药。该模型具有较好的预测能力和较好的拟合性(AUC: 0.77; Hosmer-Lemeshow检验p值:0.83)。结论:在FLS到达的患者中,COVID时间与药物处方无显著相关性,尽管计划到达在T2和T3时减少。骨折风险状况、性别、婚姻状况、生活方式、地理位置与用药处方有显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书