Motivated by worry, burdened by hopelessness: Emotional correlates of climate action and personal well-being

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Christina Saalwirth
{"title":"Motivated by worry, burdened by hopelessness: Emotional correlates of climate action and personal well-being","authors":"Christina Saalwirth","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As public awareness of climate change grows, individuals increasingly report experiencing negative emotions such as eco-worry and eco-hopelessness. This study investigated how these two emotions are associated with psychological well-being and pro-environmental behavior (PEB) and whether the focus of these emotions (individual/micro vs. collective/macro) influences these relationships. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted with adult participants from Germany. Study 1 included 339 individuals aged between 18 and 76 years (<i>M</i> = 33.17, <i>SD</i> = 15.76; 53.4% male, 46.0% female, 0.6% diverse), and Study 2 included 313 individuals (<i>M</i> = 34.93, <i>SD</i> = 15.70, 18–84 years; 50.2% male, 49.8% female). Analyses revealed that eco-hopelessness was consistently associated with lower emotional well-being and life satisfaction, whereas eco-worry showed no associations with well-being. In contrast, eco-worry was robustly related to PEB, whereas eco-hopelessness showed no association. Multigroup structural equation modeling further supported the replication of these results across both studies. In addition, the micro–macro perspectives showed distinct relations: Micro eco-hopelessness was more strongly linked to lower well-being, whereas macro eco-worry was more strongly associated with PEB. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between specific climate-related emotions and recognizing differential relations for an individual versus a collective focus.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aphw.70183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.70183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As public awareness of climate change grows, individuals increasingly report experiencing negative emotions such as eco-worry and eco-hopelessness. This study investigated how these two emotions are associated with psychological well-being and pro-environmental behavior (PEB) and whether the focus of these emotions (individual/micro vs. collective/macro) influences these relationships. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted with adult participants from Germany. Study 1 included 339 individuals aged between 18 and 76 years (M = 33.17, SD = 15.76; 53.4% male, 46.0% female, 0.6% diverse), and Study 2 included 313 individuals (M = 34.93, SD = 15.70, 18–84 years; 50.2% male, 49.8% female). Analyses revealed that eco-hopelessness was consistently associated with lower emotional well-being and life satisfaction, whereas eco-worry showed no associations with well-being. In contrast, eco-worry was robustly related to PEB, whereas eco-hopelessness showed no association. Multigroup structural equation modeling further supported the replication of these results across both studies. In addition, the micro–macro perspectives showed distinct relations: Micro eco-hopelessness was more strongly linked to lower well-being, whereas macro eco-worry was more strongly associated with PEB. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between specific climate-related emotions and recognizing differential relations for an individual versus a collective focus.

Abstract Image

忧虑驱动,绝望负担:气候行动与个人幸福的情感关联。
随着公众对气候变化意识的增强,越来越多的个人报告称经历了生态担忧和生态绝望等负面情绪。本研究探讨了这两种情绪如何与心理健康和亲环境行为(PEB)相关,以及这些情绪的焦点(个人/微观vs.集体/宏观)是否影响这些关系。两项横断面研究对来自德国的成年参与者进行了研究。研究1纳入339例18 ~ 76岁个体(M = 33.17, SD = 15.76;男性53.4%,女性46.0%,多样性0.6%),研究2纳入313例个体(M = 34.93, SD = 15.70, 18 ~ 84岁;男性50.2%,女性49.8%)。分析显示,生态绝望始终与较低的情绪幸福感和生活满意度相关,而生态担忧与幸福感无关。相比之下,生态担忧与PEB密切相关,而生态绝望则没有关联。多组结构方程模型进一步支持这些结果在两项研究中的复制。此外,微观-宏观视角显示出明显的关系:微观生态绝望与较低的幸福感联系更强,而宏观生态担忧与PEB联系更强。这些发现强调了区分特定的气候相关情绪和认识到个人与集体焦点的不同关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书