Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Periodic Health Examination: Screening for Cardiovascular Disease.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2026-05-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.v60i10.11059
Raymond V Oliva, Jose Donato A Magno, Deborah Ignacia David-Ona, John Dennis B Alcaraz, Jean D Alcover-Banal, Elmer Jasper B Llanes, Bevy Lynn Leaño, Noemi S Pestaño, Farrah Haidee Lynne D Pedracio, Jaime Alfonso M Aherrera, Elaine B Alajar, Mark A Vicente, Eddieson M Gonzales, Luigi Pierre S Segundo, Felix Eduardo R Punzalan
{"title":"Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Periodic Health Examination: Screening for Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Raymond V Oliva, Jose Donato A Magno, Deborah Ignacia David-Ona, John Dennis B Alcaraz, Jean D Alcover-Banal, Elmer Jasper B Llanes, Bevy Lynn Leaño, Noemi S Pestaño, Farrah Haidee Lynne D Pedracio, Jaime Alfonso M Aherrera, Elaine B Alajar, Mark A Vicente, Eddieson M Gonzales, Luigi Pierre S Segundo, Felix Eduardo R Punzalan","doi":"10.47895/amp.v60i10.11059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases remain to be the leading cause of death in the Philippines. Screening may lead to improvement of clinical outcomes if such conditions are detected and managed early and appropriately. The benefits of screening for a particular disease must be balanced with potential harms due to mislabeling or adverse effects of treatment, as well as socio-economic implications in the primary care setting. The main objective of this clinical practice guideline initiated by the Department of Health and the National Institutes of Health is to provide evidence-based recommendations that will help primary care physicians in detecting selected cardiovascular diseases among apparently healthy, asymptomatic individuals, while considering the socio-economic implications of the diagnostic screening tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic synthesis of evidence to address screening for six priority cardiovascular conditions among asymptomatic, apparently healthy adult Filipinos: 1) familial hypercholesterolemia, 2) coronary artery disease, 3) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 4) peripheral arterial disease, 5) abdominal aortic aneurysm, and 6) atrial fibrillation. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to CPG development recommended by the Department of Health. The process included 1) generation of critical questions and critical outcomes, 2) retrieval of current and relevant evidence, 3) synthesis and assessment of the evidence base for these critical questions, 4) formulation of draft recommendations, 5) convening of a multisectoral stakeholder panel to discuss feasibility, values, and preferences, and assess the strength of the recommendations, and 6) planning for dissemination, implementation, impact evaluation, and updating.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CPG provides seven recommendations on six prioritized questions in the screening for certain cardiovascular disorders. After presentation of the evidence by the evidence reviewer experts and deliberation by the consensus panel, we came up with two statement recommendations for the question on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and one statement recommendation each for the rest of the clinical questions. The consensus panel made strong recommendations to screening for two conditions in asymptomatic and apparently healthy Filipinos, namely: familial hypercholesterolemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm (moderate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among asymptomatic, apparently healthy adult Filipinos, we recommend routine screening for two cardiovascular conditions: familial hypercholesterolemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm, with the latter being applicable only to men 60-80 years of age. These recommendations are offered to guide the primary care physician in screening key cardiovascular diseases and should not supplant but rather supplement the healthcare provider's sound clinical judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"60 10","pages":"42-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13316241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v60i10.11059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Cardiovascular diseases remain to be the leading cause of death in the Philippines. Screening may lead to improvement of clinical outcomes if such conditions are detected and managed early and appropriately. The benefits of screening for a particular disease must be balanced with potential harms due to mislabeling or adverse effects of treatment, as well as socio-economic implications in the primary care setting. The main objective of this clinical practice guideline initiated by the Department of Health and the National Institutes of Health is to provide evidence-based recommendations that will help primary care physicians in detecting selected cardiovascular diseases among apparently healthy, asymptomatic individuals, while considering the socio-economic implications of the diagnostic screening tests.

Methods: We performed a systematic synthesis of evidence to address screening for six priority cardiovascular conditions among asymptomatic, apparently healthy adult Filipinos: 1) familial hypercholesterolemia, 2) coronary artery disease, 3) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 4) peripheral arterial disease, 5) abdominal aortic aneurysm, and 6) atrial fibrillation. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to CPG development recommended by the Department of Health. The process included 1) generation of critical questions and critical outcomes, 2) retrieval of current and relevant evidence, 3) synthesis and assessment of the evidence base for these critical questions, 4) formulation of draft recommendations, 5) convening of a multisectoral stakeholder panel to discuss feasibility, values, and preferences, and assess the strength of the recommendations, and 6) planning for dissemination, implementation, impact evaluation, and updating.

Results: The CPG provides seven recommendations on six prioritized questions in the screening for certain cardiovascular disorders. After presentation of the evidence by the evidence reviewer experts and deliberation by the consensus panel, we came up with two statement recommendations for the question on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and one statement recommendation each for the rest of the clinical questions. The consensus panel made strong recommendations to screening for two conditions in asymptomatic and apparently healthy Filipinos, namely: familial hypercholesterolemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm (moderate).

Conclusion: Among asymptomatic, apparently healthy adult Filipinos, we recommend routine screening for two cardiovascular conditions: familial hypercholesterolemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm, with the latter being applicable only to men 60-80 years of age. These recommendations are offered to guide the primary care physician in screening key cardiovascular diseases and should not supplant but rather supplement the healthcare provider's sound clinical judgment.

菲律宾定期健康检查临床实践指南:心血管疾病筛查。
背景和目的:心血管疾病仍然是菲律宾的主要死亡原因。如果及早发现并适当处理这些情况,筛查可能会改善临床结果。对特定疾病进行筛查的好处必须与因标签错误或治疗的不良影响而造成的潜在危害以及初级保健环境中的社会经济影响相平衡。这项临床实践指南由美国卫生部和美国国立卫生研究院发起,其主要目的是提供基于证据的建议,帮助初级保健医生在表面健康、无症状的个体中发现选定的心血管疾病,同时考虑到诊断筛查测试的社会经济影响。方法:我们对无症状、表面健康的菲律宾成年人进行了系统的证据综合,以筛选6种优先心血管疾病:1)家族性高胆固醇血症,2)冠状动脉疾病,3)无症状颈动脉狭窄,4)外周动脉疾病,5)腹主动脉瘤,6)心房颤动。我们采用建议分级、评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法来制定卫生部建议的CPG。该过程包括:1)提出关键问题和关键结果;2)检索当前和相关证据;3)综合和评估这些关键问题的证据基础;4)制定建议草案;5)召集多部门利益攸关方小组讨论可行性、价值和偏好,并评估建议的力度;6)规划传播、实施、影响评估和更新。结果:CPG针对某些心血管疾病筛查中的6个优先问题提供了7项建议。经过证据评审专家的证据展示和共识小组的审议,我们对腹主动脉瘤筛查的问题提出了两项声明建议,对其他临床问题提出了一项声明建议。共识小组强烈建议筛查两种无症状和明显健康的菲律宾人,即:家族性高胆固醇血症和腹主动脉瘤(中度)。结论:在无症状、明显健康的菲律宾成年人中,我们建议对两种心血管疾病进行常规筛查:家族性高胆固醇血症和腹主动脉瘤,后者仅适用于60-80岁的男性。这些建议是提供指导初级保健医生筛选关键心血管疾病,不应取代,而是补充医疗保健提供者的健全的临床判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书