{"title":"Channeling Action: How Civic Recreation Organizations Shape Civic Capacity and Engagement","authors":"Emma Scheetz, David Carter","doi":"10.1111/polp.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>In this paper, we examine the individual-level and organizational-level implications of participation in a particular type of civic association—a civic recreation organization. We deploy a small-<i>n</i> comparison group design, comparing data within and across members of a civic recreation organization with varying degrees of involvement to investigate the impacts of participation. Study results suggest that at the organizational level, civic recreation organizations can be a source of civic information, a place to build civic skills, and increase the social capital of participants. At the individual level, degree of participation in the organization did not necessarily indicate the number of civic activities the participants engaged in but rather the scope of activities, with higher degrees of participation correlating to narrower focus of civic activities. Results indicate that civic recreation organizations can serve as a gateway for people with interests outside of policy and politics to become engaged civically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Henderson, A., S. D. Brown, and S. M. Pancer. 2012. “Political and Social Dimensions of Civic Engagement: The Impact of Compulsory Community Service.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 40, no. 1: 93-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00341.x.</p>\n \n <p>Sabia, D. 2003. “Community Service Learning: Bridging Education and Social Practice.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 31, no. 2: 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00152.x.</p>\n \n <p>Tusalem, R. F. 2016. “The Effect of Historical Pact Making and Civic Associations on Democratic Outcomes.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 44, no. 4: 712–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12166.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the individual-level and organizational-level implications of participation in a particular type of civic association—a civic recreation organization. We deploy a small-n comparison group design, comparing data within and across members of a civic recreation organization with varying degrees of involvement to investigate the impacts of participation. Study results suggest that at the organizational level, civic recreation organizations can be a source of civic information, a place to build civic skills, and increase the social capital of participants. At the individual level, degree of participation in the organization did not necessarily indicate the number of civic activities the participants engaged in but rather the scope of activities, with higher degrees of participation correlating to narrower focus of civic activities. Results indicate that civic recreation organizations can serve as a gateway for people with interests outside of policy and politics to become engaged civically.
Related Articles
Henderson, A., S. D. Brown, and S. M. Pancer. 2012. “Political and Social Dimensions of Civic Engagement: The Impact of Compulsory Community Service.” Politics & Policy 40, no. 1: 93-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00341.x.
Sabia, D. 2003. “Community Service Learning: Bridging Education and Social Practice.” Politics & Policy 31, no. 2: 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00152.x.
Tusalem, R. F. 2016. “The Effect of Historical Pact Making and Civic Associations on Democratic Outcomes.” Politics & Policy 44, no. 4: 712–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12166.
在本文中,我们研究了参与一种特定类型的公民协会-公民娱乐组织的个人层面和组织层面的影响。我们采用了小n比较组设计,比较了不同参与程度的公民娱乐组织成员内部和成员之间的数据,以调查参与的影响。研究结果表明,在组织层面上,公民娱乐组织可以成为公民信息的来源,公民技能的培养场所,增加参与者的社会资本。在个人层面上,组织的参与程度并不一定表明参与者参与公民活动的数量,而是表明活动的范围,参与程度越高,公民活动的焦点越窄。结果表明,公民娱乐组织可以成为政策和政治之外的兴趣人群参与公民活动的门户。杨建军,刘建军。2012。公民参与的政治和社会维度:义务社区服务的影响。政治与政策40,不。1: 93 - 130。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00341.x。Sabia, D. 2003。社区服务学习:衔接教育与社会实践《政治与政策》第31期。2: 347 - 370。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00152.x。Tusalem, R. F. 2016。“历史契约制定和公民协会对民主结果的影响”。政治与政策44,没有。4: 712 - 750。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12166。