Thinking Through Change: Combining the Adaptive Cycle and Assemblage Theory to Assess Urban Change in Later Medieval Northern England

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Ben Jervis
{"title":"Thinking Through Change: Combining the Adaptive Cycle and Assemblage Theory to Assess Urban Change in Later Medieval Northern England","authors":"Ben Jervis","doi":"10.1007/s10816-026-09803-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential for combining elements of the adaptive cycle and assemblage thought to develop a novel approach to change in historical urban contexts is developed. It is proposed that the “adaptive cycle” model common in studies of resilience provides a valuable comparative tool for understanding change, but is limited by its conceptualization of the system as a homogeneous whole and its linear approach to temporality. This is particularly problematic given the fragmentary nature of archaeological data. To address these issues, the model is drawn into dialog with assemblage theory, an approach well attuned to these kinds of incoherent data. It is argued that correlating stages in the “adaptive cycle” with phases of assemblage formation and dissolution provides a means to engage with change as multitemporal and to better understand the material relations through which continuity and change emerge. The argument is developed through reference to evidence for boundary features, building materials and cultivation in 5 towns in Northwest England (Carlisle, Cockermouth, Kendal, Appleby, and Penrith) between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries, a period characterized by multiple crises.","PeriodicalId":47725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-026-09803-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential for combining elements of the adaptive cycle and assemblage thought to develop a novel approach to change in historical urban contexts is developed. It is proposed that the “adaptive cycle” model common in studies of resilience provides a valuable comparative tool for understanding change, but is limited by its conceptualization of the system as a homogeneous whole and its linear approach to temporality. This is particularly problematic given the fragmentary nature of archaeological data. To address these issues, the model is drawn into dialog with assemblage theory, an approach well attuned to these kinds of incoherent data. It is argued that correlating stages in the “adaptive cycle” with phases of assemblage formation and dissolution provides a means to engage with change as multitemporal and to better understand the material relations through which continuity and change emerge. The argument is developed through reference to evidence for boundary features, building materials and cultivation in 5 towns in Northwest England (Carlisle, Cockermouth, Kendal, Appleby, and Penrith) between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries, a period characterized by multiple crises.
变化中的思考:结合适应循环和组合理论评估中世纪后期英格兰北部的城市变化
结合适应性循环元素和组合思想的潜力,开发出一种新的方法来改变历史城市背景。作者认为,弹性研究中常见的“适应周期”模型为理解变化提供了一个有价值的比较工具,但它将系统概念化为一个同质整体,并对时间性采用线性方法,因此受到限制。考虑到考古数据的碎片性,这尤其成问题。为了解决这些问题,该模型被引入到与装配理论的对话中,装配理论是一种很好地适应这些不连贯数据的方法。作者认为,将“适应周期”的各个阶段与组合形成和分解阶段相关联,提供了一种将变化视为多时间的手段,并更好地理解连续性和变化产生的物质关系。这一论点是通过参考13至15世纪英格兰西北部5个城镇(卡莱尔、科克茅斯、肯德尔、阿普尔比和彭里斯)的边界特征、建筑材料和种植证据而发展起来的,这一时期以多重危机为特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, the leading journal in its field,  presents original articles that address method- or theory-focused issues of current archaeological interest and represent significant explorations on the cutting edge of the discipline.   The journal also welcomes topical syntheses that critically assess and integrate research on a specific subject in archaeological method or theory, as well as examinations of the history of archaeology.    Written by experts, the articles benefit an international audience of archaeologists, students of archaeology, and practitioners of closely related disciplines.  Specific topics covered in recent issues include:  the use of nitche construction theory in archaeology,  new developments in the use of soil chemistry in archaeological interpretation, and a model for the prehistoric development of clothing.  The Journal''s distinguished Editorial Board includes archaeologists with worldwide archaeological knowledge (the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and Africa), and expertise in a wide range of methodological and theoretical issues.  Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory is rated ''A'' in the ERIH, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List.  For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书