Do news access pathways moderate filter bubbles? Evidence from a longitudinal analysis of data donations

IF 4.6 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Rupert Kiddle, Anne Kroon, Kasper Welbers, Damian Trilling
{"title":"Do news access pathways moderate filter bubbles? Evidence from a longitudinal analysis of data donations","authors":"Rupert Kiddle, Anne Kroon, Kasper Welbers, Damian Trilling","doi":"10.1177/14614448261445423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"News access pathways shape the informational diversity of users’ news repertoires, with distributed modes such as search and social media generally providing broader exposure than direct navigation. Yet whether these differences produce filter bubble dynamics—gradual narrowing of diversity over time—remains underevaluated. We provide a direct test using donated browsing histories from <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 179 users in the Netherlands spanning approximately 1 year, combining mixed-effects models with a within-between decomposition and a content-level diversity measure capturing semantic differences between consumed articles. Within-person estimates confirm that distributed pathways enhance both outlet and topic diversity relative to direct access. For outlet diversity, search and social media show moderate convergence effects, with their diversity contributions partially eroding over sustained use; topic diversity trajectories show no pathway moderation. The within-between decomposition further reveals that aggregate pathway–diversity associations can mask opposing selection dynamics, underscoring the need for temporally granular, within-person designs when evaluating filter bubble claims.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261445423","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

News access pathways shape the informational diversity of users’ news repertoires, with distributed modes such as search and social media generally providing broader exposure than direct navigation. Yet whether these differences produce filter bubble dynamics—gradual narrowing of diversity over time—remains underevaluated. We provide a direct test using donated browsing histories from n = 179 users in the Netherlands spanning approximately 1 year, combining mixed-effects models with a within-between decomposition and a content-level diversity measure capturing semantic differences between consumed articles. Within-person estimates confirm that distributed pathways enhance both outlet and topic diversity relative to direct access. For outlet diversity, search and social media show moderate convergence effects, with their diversity contributions partially eroding over sustained use; topic diversity trajectories show no pathway moderation. The within-between decomposition further reveals that aggregate pathway–diversity associations can mask opposing selection dynamics, underscoring the need for temporally granular, within-person designs when evaluating filter bubble claims.
新闻访问途径是否能缓和过滤气泡?来自数据捐赠纵向分析的证据
新闻访问途径塑造了用户新闻库的信息多样性,搜索和社交媒体等分布式模式通常比直接导航提供更广泛的曝光。然而,这些差异是否会产生滤泡动态——随着时间的推移,多样性逐渐缩小——仍未得到充分评估。我们提供了一个直接测试,使用了荷兰n = 179名用户捐赠的浏览历史记录,跨度约为1年,将混合效果模型与内部分解和内容级多样性测量相结合,以捕获消费文章之间的语义差异。个人估计证实,相对于直接访问,分布式路径增强了出口和主题多样性。对于门店多样性,搜索和社交媒体表现出适度的收敛效应,在持续使用过程中,其多样性贡献部分被侵蚀;主题多样性轨迹不存在路径调节。中间分解进一步揭示了总体途径多样性关联可以掩盖相反的选择动态,强调了在评估过滤气泡索赔时需要暂时颗粒化的内部设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Media & Society
New Media & Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: New Media & Society engages in critical discussions of the key issues arising from the scale and speed of new media development, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and on both theoretical and empirical research. The journal includes contributions on: -the individual and the social, the cultural and the political dimensions of new media -the global and local dimensions of the relationship between media and social change -contemporary as well as historical developments -the implications and impacts of, as well as the determinants and obstacles to, media change the relationship between theory, policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书