Phrasal Verb Use and Development Among Japanese Learners of English

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brian Strong, Elif Buyukerol, Mohammad Reza Montazeri
{"title":"Phrasal Verb Use and Development Among Japanese Learners of English","authors":"Brian Strong, Elif Buyukerol, Mohammad Reza Montazeri","doi":"10.1177/13621688261459668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phrasal verbs are a frequent and essential feature of English vocabulary. However, they pose persistent challenges for second language (L2) learners, particularly those from verb-framed languages like Japanese, due to structural and semantic differences. While their difficulty is well established, little is known about how phrasal verb usage develops across different proficiency levels in authentic learner writing. This corpus-based study examines how Japanese learners of English use phrasal verbs across different proficiency levels, focusing on overall frequency, semantic category distribution, and the frequency of phrasal verb sense usage. Drawing on the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE) Written Essays subcorpus, we analyzed 400 learner essays and compared phrasal verb usage to that of native speakers. Phrasal verbs were classified by semantic type (literal, aspectual, idiomatic) and by sense frequency, based on the Phrasal Verb Pedagogical (PHaVE) List. Proficiency had only a modest impact on phrasal verb usage patterns. Learners at higher levels used a slightly broader range of phrasal verbs, but overall usage remained well below native speaker levels, with limited shifts in semantic category or use of lower-frequency senses. The findings suggest that typological differences between Japanese and English may continue to shape phrasal verb usage patterns, with proficiency alone insufficient to drive native-like development. The study highlights the need for instruction that explicitly targets phrasal verb semantics, polysemy of phrasal verbs, and contextually appropriate usage of phrasal verbs to support L2 production that more closely resembles that of native speakers.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261459668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phrasal verbs are a frequent and essential feature of English vocabulary. However, they pose persistent challenges for second language (L2) learners, particularly those from verb-framed languages like Japanese, due to structural and semantic differences. While their difficulty is well established, little is known about how phrasal verb usage develops across different proficiency levels in authentic learner writing. This corpus-based study examines how Japanese learners of English use phrasal verbs across different proficiency levels, focusing on overall frequency, semantic category distribution, and the frequency of phrasal verb sense usage. Drawing on the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE) Written Essays subcorpus, we analyzed 400 learner essays and compared phrasal verb usage to that of native speakers. Phrasal verbs were classified by semantic type (literal, aspectual, idiomatic) and by sense frequency, based on the Phrasal Verb Pedagogical (PHaVE) List. Proficiency had only a modest impact on phrasal verb usage patterns. Learners at higher levels used a slightly broader range of phrasal verbs, but overall usage remained well below native speaker levels, with limited shifts in semantic category or use of lower-frequency senses. The findings suggest that typological differences between Japanese and English may continue to shape phrasal verb usage patterns, with proficiency alone insufficient to drive native-like development. The study highlights the need for instruction that explicitly targets phrasal verb semantics, polysemy of phrasal verbs, and contextually appropriate usage of phrasal verbs to support L2 production that more closely resembles that of native speakers.
日本英语学习者动词短语的使用与发展
动词短语是英语词汇中频繁出现的基本特征。然而,由于结构和语义的差异,它们给第二语言(L2)学习者带来了持续的挑战,特别是那些使用动词框架语言(如日语)的学习者。虽然他们的难度是众所周知的,但很少有人知道在真实的学习者写作中,不同熟练程度的动词短语使用是如何发展的。这项基于语料库的研究考察了日本英语学习者在不同熟练程度下使用短语动词的情况,重点关注短语动词的总体频率、语义类别分布和短语动词意义的使用频率。利用国际亚洲英语学习者语料库网络(ICNALE)书面论文子语料库,我们分析了400篇学习者的论文,并将短语动词的使用与母语者的使用进行了比较。在《短语动词教学表》的基础上,对短语动词按语义类型(字面、体例、习惯)和意义频次进行分类。熟练程度对动词短语使用模式的影响不大。较高水平的学习者使用的动词短语范围略广,但总体用法仍远低于母语人士的水平,语义类别或低频感官的使用变化有限。研究结果表明,日语和英语之间的类型差异可能会继续影响动词短语的使用模式,仅靠熟练程度不足以推动像母语一样的发展。该研究强调了明确针对短语动词语义、短语动词的多义性和短语动词在语境中的适当使用的教学需要,以支持第二语言的产生,更接近于母语人士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书