Brian Strong, Elif Buyukerol, Mohammad Reza Montazeri
{"title":"Phrasal Verb Use and Development Among Japanese Learners of English","authors":"Brian Strong, Elif Buyukerol, Mohammad Reza Montazeri","doi":"10.1177/13621688261459668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phrasal verbs are a frequent and essential feature of English vocabulary. However, they pose persistent challenges for second language (L2) learners, particularly those from verb-framed languages like Japanese, due to structural and semantic differences. While their difficulty is well established, little is known about how phrasal verb usage develops across different proficiency levels in authentic learner writing. This corpus-based study examines how Japanese learners of English use phrasal verbs across different proficiency levels, focusing on overall frequency, semantic category distribution, and the frequency of phrasal verb sense usage. Drawing on the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE) Written Essays subcorpus, we analyzed 400 learner essays and compared phrasal verb usage to that of native speakers. Phrasal verbs were classified by semantic type (literal, aspectual, idiomatic) and by sense frequency, based on the Phrasal Verb Pedagogical (PHaVE) List. Proficiency had only a modest impact on phrasal verb usage patterns. Learners at higher levels used a slightly broader range of phrasal verbs, but overall usage remained well below native speaker levels, with limited shifts in semantic category or use of lower-frequency senses. The findings suggest that typological differences between Japanese and English may continue to shape phrasal verb usage patterns, with proficiency alone insufficient to drive native-like development. The study highlights the need for instruction that explicitly targets phrasal verb semantics, polysemy of phrasal verbs, and contextually appropriate usage of phrasal verbs to support L2 production that more closely resembles that of native speakers.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261459668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phrasal verbs are a frequent and essential feature of English vocabulary. However, they pose persistent challenges for second language (L2) learners, particularly those from verb-framed languages like Japanese, due to structural and semantic differences. While their difficulty is well established, little is known about how phrasal verb usage develops across different proficiency levels in authentic learner writing. This corpus-based study examines how Japanese learners of English use phrasal verbs across different proficiency levels, focusing on overall frequency, semantic category distribution, and the frequency of phrasal verb sense usage. Drawing on the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE) Written Essays subcorpus, we analyzed 400 learner essays and compared phrasal verb usage to that of native speakers. Phrasal verbs were classified by semantic type (literal, aspectual, idiomatic) and by sense frequency, based on the Phrasal Verb Pedagogical (PHaVE) List. Proficiency had only a modest impact on phrasal verb usage patterns. Learners at higher levels used a slightly broader range of phrasal verbs, but overall usage remained well below native speaker levels, with limited shifts in semantic category or use of lower-frequency senses. The findings suggest that typological differences between Japanese and English may continue to shape phrasal verb usage patterns, with proficiency alone insufficient to drive native-like development. The study highlights the need for instruction that explicitly targets phrasal verb semantics, polysemy of phrasal verbs, and contextually appropriate usage of phrasal verbs to support L2 production that more closely resembles that of native speakers.
期刊介绍:
Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research