An evaluation of a physical therapy app for home rehabilitation.

IF 1.2
Patryk Michał Siwiński, Tomasz Saran, Anna Siwińska
{"title":"An evaluation of a physical therapy app for home rehabilitation.","authors":"Patryk Michał Siwiński, Tomasz Saran, Anna Siwińska","doi":"10.26444/aaem/220164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>In recent years, digital tools such as mobile rehabilitation applications have been introduced to support motivation and improve patient involvement in therapy. However, the additional benefits of such tools in structured rehabilitation progrmmes remain uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a rehabilitation programme supported by a mobile application on patient motivation and functional outcomes compared with standard rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 60 participants undergoing rehabilitation. Functional performance was assessed using the TINETTI scale, and independence in daily activities evaluated with the ADL scale. Patient motivation toward physical activity was measured using a 5-point Likert scale before and after completion of rehabilitation. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons and Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements in TINETTI scores were observed in both groups (p < 0.001), indicating substantial functional improvement in balance. Motivation levels increased after rehabilitation in both groups. The motivation score increased from 3.23-3.77 in the control group and from 3.40-3.93 in the research group. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were observed. ADL results showed minimal variability, suggesting a ceiling effect and limited sensitivity of the scale for detecting functional changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structured rehabilitation resulted in significant improvements in functional performance and patient motivation. The rehabilitation programme supported by a mobile application did not demonstrate superior outcomes compared with standard rehabilitation in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520557,"journal":{"name":"Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM","volume":"33 2","pages":"265-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/220164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: In recent years, digital tools such as mobile rehabilitation applications have been introduced to support motivation and improve patient involvement in therapy. However, the additional benefits of such tools in structured rehabilitation progrmmes remain uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a rehabilitation programme supported by a mobile application on patient motivation and functional outcomes compared with standard rehabilitation.

Material and methods: The study included 60 participants undergoing rehabilitation. Functional performance was assessed using the TINETTI scale, and independence in daily activities evaluated with the ADL scale. Patient motivation toward physical activity was measured using a 5-point Likert scale before and after completion of rehabilitation. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons and Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted.

Results: Significant improvements in TINETTI scores were observed in both groups (p < 0.001), indicating substantial functional improvement in balance. Motivation levels increased after rehabilitation in both groups. The motivation score increased from 3.23-3.77 in the control group and from 3.40-3.93 in the research group. However, no statistically significant differences between groups were observed. ADL results showed minimal variability, suggesting a ceiling effect and limited sensitivity of the scale for detecting functional changes.

Conclusions: Structured rehabilitation resulted in significant improvements in functional performance and patient motivation. The rehabilitation programme supported by a mobile application did not demonstrate superior outcomes compared with standard rehabilitation in this study.

对一款用于家庭康复的物理治疗应用的评估。
前言和目的:近年来,诸如移动康复应用程序等数字工具已被引入,以支持动机并提高患者对治疗的参与。然而,这些工具在有组织的康复方案中的额外好处仍然不确定。本研究的目的是评估由移动应用程序支持的康复方案与标准康复相比对患者动机和功能结果的影响。材料和方法:本研究包括60名接受康复治疗的参与者。功能表现采用TINETTI量表评估,日常活动独立性采用ADL量表评估。在康复完成之前和之后,使用5点李克特量表测量患者对体育活动的动机。统计分析包括组内比较的Wilcoxon sign -rank检验和组间比较的Mann-Whitney U检验。采用p < 0.05的显著性水平。结果:两组患者的TINETTI评分均有显著改善(p < 0.001),表明平衡功能显著改善。康复后两组患者的动力水平均有所提高。动机得分从对照组的3.23-3.77分和研究组的3.40-3.93分上升。但两组间无统计学差异。ADL结果显示出最小的可变性,表明在检测功能变化时存在天花板效应和有限的灵敏度。结论:有组织的康复治疗显著改善了患者的功能表现和积极性。在本研究中,与标准康复相比,由移动应用程序支持的康复方案没有显示出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书