Catastrophic CD34+ autologous hematopoietic stem cell collection despite sustained mobilization and solutions to rescue the harvests.

Laurence Raoult-Valette, Arnaud Campidelli, Isabelle Boutin, Isabelle Gauvrit, Florent Perdriel-Vaissière, Dehbia Menouche, Pauline Soler, Quoc Hung Le, Philippe Rey, Caroline Regny, Kahina Ouis Tahri, Nabih Azar, Angela Granata, Christina Vieira Dos Santos, Emmanuel Rouger, Aude Le Tallec, Olivier Hequet
{"title":"Catastrophic CD34+ autologous hematopoietic stem cell collection despite sustained mobilization and solutions to rescue the harvests.","authors":"Laurence Raoult-Valette, Arnaud Campidelli, Isabelle Boutin, Isabelle Gauvrit, Florent Perdriel-Vaissière, Dehbia Menouche, Pauline Soler, Quoc Hung Le, Philippe Rey, Caroline Regny, Kahina Ouis Tahri, Nabih Azar, Angela Granata, Christina Vieira Dos Santos, Emmanuel Rouger, Aude Le Tallec, Olivier Hequet","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2026.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poor collection of hematopoietic stem cells during insufficient mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation has been widely described. However, only isolated cases of insufficient stem cell collection despite adequate mobilization prior to autologous transplantation have been reported. Over a 5-year period, French apheresis teams reported 31 cases of highly disastrous HSC collection (1.0±0.9 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg, median 0.65) (using a continuous collection method), despite adequate levels of circulating CD34+ cells (79 ± 49/μL, median 79/μL) during the processing of 3 blood volumes. Collection efficiency is the main indicator for assessing the ability to collect cells during cytapheresis. These collections were characterized by disastrous collection efficiencies (CE<sub>2</sub>), considered very low below 20% (8/31 patients) and catastrophic below 10% (23/31 patients). The teams attempted to find solutions to compensate for these disastrous and unexpected collections. Changes to the collection parameters led only to minor improvements in collection efficiency (CE<sub>2</sub>=8 ± 5 vs 5 ± 2%) and the amount of hematopoietic stem cells collected (1.46 ± 1.39 vs 0.56 ± 0.45 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg), while switching from a continuous collection technique to a discontinuous technique resulted in a significant improvement in collection efficiencies (39 ± 20 vs 8 ± 6%) and the amount of hematopoietic stem cells collected (4.64 ± 3.39 vs 1.09 ± 0.88 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg). Our work highlights the importance of switching from a continuous collection technique to a discontinuous technique in cases of catastrophic collection despite appropriate hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94255,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2026.06.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor collection of hematopoietic stem cells during insufficient mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation has been widely described. However, only isolated cases of insufficient stem cell collection despite adequate mobilization prior to autologous transplantation have been reported. Over a 5-year period, French apheresis teams reported 31 cases of highly disastrous HSC collection (1.0±0.9 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, median 0.65) (using a continuous collection method), despite adequate levels of circulating CD34+ cells (79 ± 49/μL, median 79/μL) during the processing of 3 blood volumes. Collection efficiency is the main indicator for assessing the ability to collect cells during cytapheresis. These collections were characterized by disastrous collection efficiencies (CE2), considered very low below 20% (8/31 patients) and catastrophic below 10% (23/31 patients). The teams attempted to find solutions to compensate for these disastrous and unexpected collections. Changes to the collection parameters led only to minor improvements in collection efficiency (CE2=8 ± 5 vs 5 ± 2%) and the amount of hematopoietic stem cells collected (1.46 ± 1.39 vs 0.56 ± 0.45 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg), while switching from a continuous collection technique to a discontinuous technique resulted in a significant improvement in collection efficiencies (39 ± 20 vs 8 ± 6%) and the amount of hematopoietic stem cells collected (4.64 ± 3.39 vs 1.09 ± 0.88 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg). Our work highlights the importance of switching from a continuous collection technique to a discontinuous technique in cases of catastrophic collection despite appropriate hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

灾难性的CD34+自体造血干细胞收集,尽管持续动员和解决方案,以挽救收成。
自体干细胞移植动员不足时,造血干细胞收集不良已被广泛报道。然而,只有个别病例的干细胞收集不足,尽管充分动员之前,自体移植已报道。在5年期间,法国单采小组报告了31例高度灾难性的HSC收集(1.0±0.9 × 106 CD34+细胞/kg,中位数0.65)(使用连续收集方法),尽管在处理3个血容量期间循环CD34+细胞水平足够(79±49/μL,中位数79/μL)。收集效率是评价细胞分离过程中收集细胞能力的主要指标。这些收集的特点是灾难性的收集效率(CE2),被认为非常低,低于20%(8/31例患者),灾难性低于10%(23/31例患者)。这些团队试图找到解决方案来弥补这些灾难性的和意想不到的收集。收集参数的变化导致只有轻微改善收集效率(CE2 = 8±5对5±2%)和造血干细胞的数量收集(1.46±1.39 vs 0.56±0.45×106 CD34 +细胞/公斤),而从连续收集技术转向一种不连续技术导致显著改善收集效率(39±20 vs 8±6%)和造血干细胞采集(4.64±3.39 vs 1.09±0.88×106 CD34 +细胞/公斤)。我们的工作强调了从连续收集技术切换到不连续技术的重要性,在灾难性收集的情况下,尽管适当的造血干细胞动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书