Daniele Farsetti, Francesca Pometti, Gian Paolo Novelli, Barbara Vasapollo, Herbert Valensise
{"title":"The Cardiac-Fetal-Placental Unit: links between umbilical venous flow and maternal hemodynamics in fetal growth restriction","authors":"Daniele Farsetti, Francesca Pometti, Gian Paolo Novelli, Barbara Vasapollo, Herbert Valensise","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2026.102745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality, yet its identification remains challenging due to the limited sensitivity of conventional biometric assessment and the lack of a reliable tool for assessing placental function. Placental function depends on uteroplacental perfusion which, in turn reflects maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy. In this context, umbilical venous flow (UVF) has emerged as a quantitative parameter reflecting fetal blood supply and a potential surrogate marker of placental function.</div><div>This narrative review aims to provide an overview of UVF and maternal hemodynamics, and to explore their interaction within the framework of the cardiac–fetal–placental unit.</div><div>The current literature indicates that UVF is reduced in pregnancies complicated by FGR, and it correlates significantly with maternal cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). A hypodynamic maternal profile (high SVR, low CO) is consistently associated with reduced UVF and impaired placental perfusion, regardless of fetal biometry.</div><div>The integration of maternal cardiovascular assessment and UVF evaluation provides a functional perspective on placental insufficiency and may improve the identification of pregnancies at risk. Furthermore, this approach offers a potential framework for understanding the effects of maternal hemodynamic interventions on fetal growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102745"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693426000453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality, yet its identification remains challenging due to the limited sensitivity of conventional biometric assessment and the lack of a reliable tool for assessing placental function. Placental function depends on uteroplacental perfusion which, in turn reflects maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy. In this context, umbilical venous flow (UVF) has emerged as a quantitative parameter reflecting fetal blood supply and a potential surrogate marker of placental function.
This narrative review aims to provide an overview of UVF and maternal hemodynamics, and to explore their interaction within the framework of the cardiac–fetal–placental unit.
The current literature indicates that UVF is reduced in pregnancies complicated by FGR, and it correlates significantly with maternal cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). A hypodynamic maternal profile (high SVR, low CO) is consistently associated with reduced UVF and impaired placental perfusion, regardless of fetal biometry.
The integration of maternal cardiovascular assessment and UVF evaluation provides a functional perspective on placental insufficiency and may improve the identification of pregnancies at risk. Furthermore, this approach offers a potential framework for understanding the effects of maternal hemodynamic interventions on fetal growth.
期刊介绍:
In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology.
All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management.
Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.