Supporting patients and family members facing treatment choices in chronic kidney disease: What do professionals think of the decision aids used? - Professionals’ views on treatment decision support tools

IF 0.7
Elisa Brun, Lucile Montalescot, Anne Kolko, Aurélie Untas
{"title":"Supporting patients and family members facing treatment choices in chronic kidney disease: What do professionals think of the decision aids used? - Professionals’ views on treatment decision support tools","authors":"Elisa Brun, Lucile Montalescot, Anne Kolko, Aurélie Untas","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2026.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Research has explored health care providers' perceptions of shared medical decision-making, but to our knowledge, no study in France has examined their use of decision aids. The objective of this study was to explore how nephrology professionals use and perceive the tools designed to support patients with chronic kidney disease and their families when choosing a treatment.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 professionals involved in treatment decisions for chronic kidney disease. The data were processed using inductive thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven themes emerged from the analyses, highlighting both the wide variety of tools used and the central role played by professional stance in how they are used. The technical sophistication of these tools should not replace interaction between patients and health care professionals. According to the participants, the ideal tool should facilitate learning, empower patients, and strengthen the relationship between health care professionals and patients, or even between health care professionals and family members . The role accorded to family members varied greatly among respondents, with some expressing a degree of ambivalence regarding whether and how they should be involved in using these decision-making support tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study documents the existence of a wide variety of tools used by health care professionals. Beyond their informational role, these tools fulfil many other functions. On the basis of these results, a survey of a broad panel of professionals would provide a more detailed picture of practices in France.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"22 3","pages":"167-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2026.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Research has explored health care providers' perceptions of shared medical decision-making, but to our knowledge, no study in France has examined their use of decision aids. The objective of this study was to explore how nephrology professionals use and perceive the tools designed to support patients with chronic kidney disease and their families when choosing a treatment.

Methodology: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 professionals involved in treatment decisions for chronic kidney disease. The data were processed using inductive thematic content analysis.

Results: Seven themes emerged from the analyses, highlighting both the wide variety of tools used and the central role played by professional stance in how they are used. The technical sophistication of these tools should not replace interaction between patients and health care professionals. According to the participants, the ideal tool should facilitate learning, empower patients, and strengthen the relationship between health care professionals and patients, or even between health care professionals and family members . The role accorded to family members varied greatly among respondents, with some expressing a degree of ambivalence regarding whether and how they should be involved in using these decision-making support tools.

Conclusion: This study documents the existence of a wide variety of tools used by health care professionals. Beyond their informational role, these tools fulfil many other functions. On the basis of these results, a survey of a broad panel of professionals would provide a more detailed picture of practices in France.

支持面临慢性肾脏疾病治疗选择的患者和家属:专业人士如何看待所使用的决策辅助工具?-专业人士对治疗决策支持工具的看法
背景:研究探讨了卫生保健提供者对共同医疗决策的看法,但据我们所知,法国没有研究调查他们对决策辅助工具的使用。本研究的目的是探讨肾脏病专业人员在选择治疗方案时如何使用和理解旨在支持慢性肾脏疾病患者及其家属的工具。方法:对参与慢性肾脏疾病治疗决策的17名专业人员进行半结构化访谈。采用归纳主题内容分析法对数据进行处理。结果:从分析中出现了七个主题,突出了所使用的各种工具以及专业立场在如何使用这些工具方面发挥的核心作用。这些工具的技术复杂性不应取代患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的互动。根据参与者的说法,理想的工具应该促进学习,赋予患者权力,并加强卫生保健专业人员与患者之间,甚至卫生保健专业人员与家庭成员之间的关系。受访者对家庭成员的作用的看法差异很大,有些人对是否以及如何参与使用这些决策支持工具表示了一定程度的矛盾心理。结论:本研究记录了卫生保健专业人员使用的各种工具的存在。除了提供信息之外,这些工具还具有许多其他功能。在这些结果的基础上,对广泛的专业人员小组进行调查将提供更详细的法国实践情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书