Metabolic Intensification in Limb Salvage: A Doubly Robust Dual-Center Study Establishing 37.9 g/L as the Physiological Requirement for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Regeneration.

IF 1.5
Terry Hao-Yu Qin, Atiqah Aziz, Xiu-Wen Ling, Amber Haseeb, Eva Mahirah Zulkifli, Tunku Kamarul, Han-Ling Tan, Aiden Yi-Fei Wang
{"title":"Metabolic Intensification in Limb Salvage: A Doubly Robust Dual-Center Study Establishing 37.9 g/L as the Physiological Requirement for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Regeneration.","authors":"Terry Hao-Yu Qin, Atiqah Aziz, Xiu-Wen Ling, Amber Haseeb, Eva Mahirah Zulkifli, Tunku Kamarul, Han-Ling Tan, Aiden Yi-Fei Wang","doi":"10.1177/15347346261465333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundClinical guidelines conventionally define nutritional adequacy using a 35 g/L serum albumin threshold. However, its biological sufficiency for driving diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) regeneration remains unvalidated. This investigation utilized a structural modeling framework to interrogate the non-linear relationship between albumin and DFU repair and to identify the precise physiological threshold required for active healing.MethodsThis prospective, dual-center cohort study of 733 DFU patients utilized a 20-week observation window anchored to baseline enrollment (Time Zero, T0). To isolate the independent metabolic effect of albumin from systemic inflammatory confounding, we implemented a doubly robust framework integrating generalized propensity score (GPS) weighting with restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling. The primary endpoint was Percentage Area Reduction (PAR) at 20 weeks.ResultsBaseline albumin was identified as a significant independent driver of wound reduction (β = 3.25; 95% CI: 0.76-5.73; P = 0.01) and a protective factor against major amputation (OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99; P = 0.037). RCS analysis revealed a highly significant non-linear trajectory (P for non-linearity < 0.001) with a biological inflection point at 37.9 g/L. No significant regenerative progress occurred within the 31.4-37.9 g/L stagnation plateau. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the conventional 35 g/L cutoff failed to differentiate healing outcomes (P = 0.869), resulting in 45.8% of normoalbuminemic patients being misclassified within a state of regenerative arrest. The calculated E-value of 3.40 confirms profound robustness against unmeasured confounding.ConclusionsThe conventional 35 g/L albumin threshold is clinically inadequate to sustain the metabolic demands of DFU repair. To breach the identified stagnation plateau and transition the wound bed toward active regeneration, clinicians should prioritize a new physiological target of 37.9 g/L (clinically operationalized as ≥ 38 g/L). This necessitates a strategic shift toward metabolic intensification in limb salvage protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346261465333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346261465333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundClinical guidelines conventionally define nutritional adequacy using a 35 g/L serum albumin threshold. However, its biological sufficiency for driving diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) regeneration remains unvalidated. This investigation utilized a structural modeling framework to interrogate the non-linear relationship between albumin and DFU repair and to identify the precise physiological threshold required for active healing.MethodsThis prospective, dual-center cohort study of 733 DFU patients utilized a 20-week observation window anchored to baseline enrollment (Time Zero, T0). To isolate the independent metabolic effect of albumin from systemic inflammatory confounding, we implemented a doubly robust framework integrating generalized propensity score (GPS) weighting with restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling. The primary endpoint was Percentage Area Reduction (PAR) at 20 weeks.ResultsBaseline albumin was identified as a significant independent driver of wound reduction (β = 3.25; 95% CI: 0.76-5.73; P = 0.01) and a protective factor against major amputation (OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99; P = 0.037). RCS analysis revealed a highly significant non-linear trajectory (P for non-linearity < 0.001) with a biological inflection point at 37.9 g/L. No significant regenerative progress occurred within the 31.4-37.9 g/L stagnation plateau. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the conventional 35 g/L cutoff failed to differentiate healing outcomes (P = 0.869), resulting in 45.8% of normoalbuminemic patients being misclassified within a state of regenerative arrest. The calculated E-value of 3.40 confirms profound robustness against unmeasured confounding.ConclusionsThe conventional 35 g/L albumin threshold is clinically inadequate to sustain the metabolic demands of DFU repair. To breach the identified stagnation plateau and transition the wound bed toward active regeneration, clinicians should prioritize a new physiological target of 37.9 g/L (clinically operationalized as ≥ 38 g/L). This necessitates a strategic shift toward metabolic intensification in limb salvage protocols.

残肢修复中的代谢增强:一项双稳健双中心研究,确定37.9 g/L为糖尿病足溃疡再生的生理需求。
临床指南通常使用35g /L血清白蛋白阈值来定义营养充足性。然而,其驱动糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)再生的生物学充分性仍未得到证实。本研究利用结构建模框架来询问白蛋白和DFU修复之间的非线性关系,并确定主动愈合所需的精确生理阈值。方法:本前瞻性双中心队列研究纳入733例DFU患者,采用以基线入组为基准的20周观察窗(时间0,T0)。为了将白蛋白的独立代谢效应从系统性炎症混淆中分离出来,我们实施了一个双鲁棒框架,将广义倾向评分(GPS)加权与限制性三次样条(RCS)建模相结合。主要终点是20周时的百分比面积减少(PAR)。结果基线白蛋白被确定为伤口减少的重要独立驱动因素(β = 3.25; 95% CI: 0.76-5.73; P = 0.01)和防止主要截肢的保护因素(OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99; P = 0.037)。RCS分析显示了高度显著的非线性轨迹(非线性P < 0.001),生物拐点为37.9 g/L。在31.4-37.9 g/L的停滞平台内,没有显著的再生进展。敏感性分析证实,常规的35 g/L临界值无法区分愈合结果(P = 0.869),导致45.8%的正常白蛋白血症患者被错误地归类为再生停搏状态。计算的e值为3.40,证实了对未测量混杂的深度稳健性。结论常规的35 g/L白蛋白阈值在临床上不足以维持DFU修复的代谢需求。为了突破已确定的停滞平台并使伤口床向主动再生过渡,临床医生应优先考虑37.9 g/L的新生理目标(临床操作为≥38 g/L)。这需要在肢体保留方案中向代谢强化的战略转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书