Shear bond strength of three composite resins for orthodontic bracket bonding on enamel and ceramic surfaces: an in vitro study after accelerated aging.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2026-06-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v13.46209
Melina Nohemi Atarihuana Diaz, Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas, Krisnaya Muñoz
{"title":"Shear bond strength of three composite resins for orthodontic bracket bonding on enamel and ceramic surfaces: an in vitro study after accelerated aging.","authors":"Melina Nohemi Atarihuana Diaz, Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas, Krisnaya Muñoz","doi":"10.2340/biid.v13.46209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three composite resins, Z250 (3M), Transbond XT (3M), and Brace Paste (AO), used for orthodontic bracket bonding on human enamel and ceramic surfaces, after undergoing accelerated aging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An in vitro experimental design was conducted using 30 enamel specimens (human premolars) and 30 ceramic specimens (Brava Block, FGM), divided into three subgroups per substrate (<i>n</i> = 10 each). All specimens were etched (37% phosphoric acid for enamel, 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for ceramic), treated with silane (ceramics), and bonded using the designated composite resins. Specimens were subjected to an autoclave aging protocol. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and statistical analysis included Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), <i>t</i> tests, and chi-square tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Transbond XT exhibited the highest mean SBS on ceramic surfaces (10.4 ± 5.2 MPa), while Brace Paste showed the highest SBS on enamel (7.3 ± 2.4 MPa). However, no statistically significant differences were observed among the composite resins in either substrate (<i>p</i> > 0.05). All materials demonstrated SBS values within or close to the clinically acceptable range for orthodontic bonding (approximately 6-8 MPa).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although numerical differences were found, all three composite resins demonstrated comparable performance. When appropriate surface conditioning protocols are applied, any of the tested materials can be considered reliable for bracket bonding to both enamel and ceramic substrates. Further in vivo studies are recommended to validate long-term durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"13 ","pages":"46209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three composite resins, Z250 (3M), Transbond XT (3M), and Brace Paste (AO), used for orthodontic bracket bonding on human enamel and ceramic surfaces, after undergoing accelerated aging.

Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental design was conducted using 30 enamel specimens (human premolars) and 30 ceramic specimens (Brava Block, FGM), divided into three subgroups per substrate (n = 10 each). All specimens were etched (37% phosphoric acid for enamel, 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for ceramic), treated with silane (ceramics), and bonded using the designated composite resins. Specimens were subjected to an autoclave aging protocol. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and statistical analysis included Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), t tests, and chi-square tests (α = 0.05).

Results: Transbond XT exhibited the highest mean SBS on ceramic surfaces (10.4 ± 5.2 MPa), while Brace Paste showed the highest SBS on enamel (7.3 ± 2.4 MPa). However, no statistically significant differences were observed among the composite resins in either substrate (p > 0.05). All materials demonstrated SBS values within or close to the clinically acceptable range for orthodontic bonding (approximately 6-8 MPa).

Conclusion: Although numerical differences were found, all three composite resins demonstrated comparable performance. When appropriate surface conditioning protocols are applied, any of the tested materials can be considered reliable for bracket bonding to both enamel and ceramic substrates. Further in vivo studies are recommended to validate long-term durability.

三种复合树脂用于牙釉质和陶瓷表面正畸支架的剪切结合强度:加速老化后的体外研究。
目的:评价和比较Z250 (3M)、Transbond XT (3M)和Brace Paste (AO)三种复合树脂在牙釉质和陶瓷表面的正畸托槽粘接加速老化后的剪切粘接强度(SBS)。材料与方法:采用牙釉质(人前磨牙)和陶瓷(Brava Block, FGM)各30个标本进行体外实验设计,每个基质分为3个亚组(n = 10)。所有的标本都被蚀刻(搪瓷用37%磷酸,陶瓷用9.6%氢氟酸),用硅烷(陶瓷)处理,并用指定的复合树脂粘合。样品经过高压灭菌器老化处理。SBS采用通用检验机测量,统计分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)、t检验和卡方检验(α = 0.05)。结果:Transbond XT在陶瓷表面的平均SBS最高(10.4±5.2 MPa),而Brace Paste在牙釉质表面的平均SBS最高(7.3±2.4 MPa)。然而,两种基质中复合树脂间的差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所有材料的SBS值都在或接近临床可接受的正畸粘接范围内(约6- 8mpa)。结论:虽然数值上存在差异,但三种复合树脂的性能相当。当应用适当的表面调理方案时,任何被测试的材料都可以被认为是可靠的,可以将支架粘合到搪瓷和陶瓷基材上。建议进一步的体内研究来验证其长期耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书