Matthew Smith, Jackson Prestwood, Krista Highland, Matthew Nealeigh, Tiger Lindsay, Kayla Knuf
{"title":"Epidural anesthesia not associated with decreased 30-day surgical site infection occurrence after open colorectal surgery.","authors":"Matthew Smith, Jackson Prestwood, Krista Highland, Matthew Nealeigh, Tiger Lindsay, Kayla Knuf","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSI) after colorectal surgery are common. Epidural anesthesia (EA) has demonstrated multiple beneficial effects for patients undergoing open colorectal surgery. However, research regarding the relationship between EA and SSI after open colorectal surgery remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 2022-2023 data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project registry. Patients were included if they received a colorectal procedure without additional minor or major therapeutic procedures. Generalized additive models evaluated 30-day occurrence of any SSI (primary outcome), as well as incisional SSI and organ-space SSI (secondary outcomes). A sensitivity analysis of the primary outcome incorporated propensity score weighting to account for treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6,343 patients included in the data set, 1,495 (24%) received EA and 3,391 (53%) received colorectal resection. EA was not significantly associated with any SSI (OR 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.33, P = .26), superficial/deep incisional SSI (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.96-1.61, P = .11), or organ-space SSI (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80-1.25, P = .98). The primary findings were consistent in the sensitivity analysis (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77-1.08, P = .27). Patients undergoing enterostomy procedures were more likely to experience all three SSI outcomes relative to those who received colorectal resections without enterostomies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a lack of significant differences in the odds of SSI between patients who did and did not receive EA for elective open colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Surgical site infections (SSI) after colorectal surgery are common. Epidural anesthesia (EA) has demonstrated multiple beneficial effects for patients undergoing open colorectal surgery. However, research regarding the relationship between EA and SSI after open colorectal surgery remains limited.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 2022-2023 data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project registry. Patients were included if they received a colorectal procedure without additional minor or major therapeutic procedures. Generalized additive models evaluated 30-day occurrence of any SSI (primary outcome), as well as incisional SSI and organ-space SSI (secondary outcomes). A sensitivity analysis of the primary outcome incorporated propensity score weighting to account for treatment selection.
Results: Of the 6,343 patients included in the data set, 1,495 (24%) received EA and 3,391 (53%) received colorectal resection. EA was not significantly associated with any SSI (OR 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.33, P = .26), superficial/deep incisional SSI (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.96-1.61, P = .11), or organ-space SSI (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80-1.25, P = .98). The primary findings were consistent in the sensitivity analysis (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77-1.08, P = .27). Patients undergoing enterostomy procedures were more likely to experience all three SSI outcomes relative to those who received colorectal resections without enterostomies.
Conclusion: There was a lack of significant differences in the odds of SSI between patients who did and did not receive EA for elective open colorectal surgery.
目的:探讨结直肠术后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率。硬膜外麻醉(EA)已被证明对开腹结直肠手术患者有多种有益效果。然而,关于直肠开腹手术后EA与SSI之间关系的研究仍然有限。方法:本回顾性研究分析了美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进项目登记处2022-2023年的数据。如果患者接受了结直肠手术而没有额外的小或大的治疗程序,则纳入其中。广义加性模型评估30天内发生的任何SSI(主要结局),以及切口SSI和器官空间SSI(次要结局)。对主要结局的敏感性分析纳入了倾向评分加权来解释治疗选择。结果:在纳入数据集的6343例患者中,1495例(24%)接受了EA治疗,3391例(53%)接受了结肠直肠切除术。EA与任何SSI (OR 1.11, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.93-1.33, P = 0.26)、浅/深切口SSI (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.96-1.61, P = 0.11)或器官间隙SSI (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80-1.25, P = 0.98)均无显著相关性。敏感性分析的主要结果是一致的(OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77-1.08, P = 0.27)。接受肠造口手术的患者比不接受肠造口手术的患者更有可能经历所有三种SSI结果。结论:择期开腹结直肠手术中接受和未接受EA的患者发生SSI的几率没有显著差异。