{"title":"[Digital health applications and adherence in depression: a qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers].","authors":"Francesca Denby, Sophie Brenner, Brit S Schneider","doi":"10.1007/s00115-026-01994-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shortages of healthcare professionals and the rising prevalence of depressive disorders are creating gaps in care. When used correctly and consistently, digital health applications (DiGA) can help bridge these gaps. This study examines, from the perspective of healthcare providers, criteria for DiGA selection, their integration into therapy and the promotion of patient adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this qualitative study eight semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with psychiatrists, psychotherapists and general practitioners in and around Osnabrück, Germany. The interviews were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents primarily use DiGA as adjunctive therapy or to bridge waiting periods. They seem particularly suitable for patients with mild symptoms, technical skills and good self-organization. Monitoring progress and integrating DiGA into therapeutic routines support continued use. Providers are only partially aware of their influence on adherence. Most respondents reported limited knowledge of the app content and a lack of confidence in the technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the effectiveness of DiGA is proven and the role of medical or therapeutic support in promoting adherence is recognized, insufficient information, a lack of transparency regarding app content and the absence of best practices are hindrances to practical implementation. To realize the full potential of DiGA providers should be supported with product-neutral, quality-assured information and practical guidance for integration into therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-01994-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Shortages of healthcare professionals and the rising prevalence of depressive disorders are creating gaps in care. When used correctly and consistently, digital health applications (DiGA) can help bridge these gaps. This study examines, from the perspective of healthcare providers, criteria for DiGA selection, their integration into therapy and the promotion of patient adherence.
Methods: For this qualitative study eight semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with psychiatrists, psychotherapists and general practitioners in and around Osnabrück, Germany. The interviews were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.
Results: Respondents primarily use DiGA as adjunctive therapy or to bridge waiting periods. They seem particularly suitable for patients with mild symptoms, technical skills and good self-organization. Monitoring progress and integrating DiGA into therapeutic routines support continued use. Providers are only partially aware of their influence on adherence. Most respondents reported limited knowledge of the app content and a lack of confidence in the technology.
Conclusion: Although the effectiveness of DiGA is proven and the role of medical or therapeutic support in promoting adherence is recognized, insufficient information, a lack of transparency regarding app content and the absence of best practices are hindrances to practical implementation. To realize the full potential of DiGA providers should be supported with product-neutral, quality-assured information and practical guidance for integration into therapy.
期刊介绍:
Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented.
Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.