Food is the Best Medicine (FBM): design and baseline findings from a multi-arm randomized controlled trial among food-insecure postpartum mothers in Texas.

IF 2.7 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Aida Nielsen, Alexis Falzone, Christopher Reyes, Elizabeth Polinard, Victoria Threadgould, Nalini Ranjit, Martha Diaz Marin, Alejandra Gonzalez, Maria Tello, Andrea Abel, Joi Chevalier, Alicia Fischweicher, Alexandra van den Berg
{"title":"Food is the Best Medicine (FBM): design and baseline findings from a multi-arm randomized controlled trial among food-insecure postpartum mothers in Texas.","authors":"Aida Nielsen, Alexis Falzone, Christopher Reyes, Elizabeth Polinard, Victoria Threadgould, Nalini Ranjit, Martha Diaz Marin, Alejandra Gonzalez, Maria Tello, Andrea Abel, Joi Chevalier, Alicia Fischweicher, Alexandra van den Berg","doi":"10.1186/s40795-026-01406-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food is Medicine (FIM) interventions, which connect health-supporting food programs with healthcare systems, demonstrate substantial clinical and economic benefits. However, few FIM studies have focused on the health of postpartum mothers, a population facing unique vulnerabilities during a critical period. Food is the Best Medicine (FBM) is an 8-week, home-delivery-based FIM intervention targeting postpartum mothers experiencing food insecurity. Developed through partnerships between healthcare providers and community-based organizations, the FBM intervention integrates food delivery with supportive services. Here, we describe the research design and present baseline findings of a study evaluating the impacts of supplementing the FBM intervention with different sustainability-enhancing modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Food is the Best Medicine (FBM) study was a three-arm randomized controlled trial conducted in Central Texas. Food-insecure postpartum mothers (n = 150) were randomized to receive: (1) FBM-Standard (8-week food delivery), (2) FBM-CHW (standard delivery plus Community Health Worker (CHW) support), or (3) FBM-Virtual (standard delivery plus online educational platform). Primary planned outcome measures included food security and fruit, vegetables, and whole grain intake. Secondary planned outcome measures included nutrition security, breastfeeding rates, mental health, financial stress, and cooking behaviors. Baseline data were collected via telephone or online surveys prior to randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were predominantly Hispanic (71%) and Spanish-speaking (79%), with a mean household income of $20,620 (SD = $18,190). Most lived in households with multiple children (74%), in which the number of children and adults ranged from 1 to 15 and 1 to 9, respectively, and had limited formal education (38% without a high school diploma). Marital status was not collected. At baseline, 89% were food insecure. Depression screening indicated mental health concerns in 13% of participants. The 10-item Dietary Screener Questionnaire was used to assess fruit and vegetable intake. Mean fruit and vegetable consumption was 3.9 cups daily, but consumption of whole-grain bread and cooked whole grains was low, at about once a week.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FBM study uses a multi-component, randomized design to evaluate variations of a FIM intervention among food-insecure postpartum mothers. The intervention incorporates food delivery, CHW support, and virtual education components. Ongoing analyses will assess the potential of these approaches to improve food security and related maternal health outcomes in the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06428578 (registered May 20, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01406-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Food is Medicine (FIM) interventions, which connect health-supporting food programs with healthcare systems, demonstrate substantial clinical and economic benefits. However, few FIM studies have focused on the health of postpartum mothers, a population facing unique vulnerabilities during a critical period. Food is the Best Medicine (FBM) is an 8-week, home-delivery-based FIM intervention targeting postpartum mothers experiencing food insecurity. Developed through partnerships between healthcare providers and community-based organizations, the FBM intervention integrates food delivery with supportive services. Here, we describe the research design and present baseline findings of a study evaluating the impacts of supplementing the FBM intervention with different sustainability-enhancing modalities.

Methods: The Food is the Best Medicine (FBM) study was a three-arm randomized controlled trial conducted in Central Texas. Food-insecure postpartum mothers (n = 150) were randomized to receive: (1) FBM-Standard (8-week food delivery), (2) FBM-CHW (standard delivery plus Community Health Worker (CHW) support), or (3) FBM-Virtual (standard delivery plus online educational platform). Primary planned outcome measures included food security and fruit, vegetables, and whole grain intake. Secondary planned outcome measures included nutrition security, breastfeeding rates, mental health, financial stress, and cooking behaviors. Baseline data were collected via telephone or online surveys prior to randomization.

Results: Participants were predominantly Hispanic (71%) and Spanish-speaking (79%), with a mean household income of $20,620 (SD = $18,190). Most lived in households with multiple children (74%), in which the number of children and adults ranged from 1 to 15 and 1 to 9, respectively, and had limited formal education (38% without a high school diploma). Marital status was not collected. At baseline, 89% were food insecure. Depression screening indicated mental health concerns in 13% of participants. The 10-item Dietary Screener Questionnaire was used to assess fruit and vegetable intake. Mean fruit and vegetable consumption was 3.9 cups daily, but consumption of whole-grain bread and cooked whole grains was low, at about once a week.

Conclusions: The FBM study uses a multi-component, randomized design to evaluate variations of a FIM intervention among food-insecure postpartum mothers. The intervention incorporates food delivery, CHW support, and virtual education components. Ongoing analyses will assess the potential of these approaches to improve food security and related maternal health outcomes in the postpartum period.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06428578 (registered May 20, 2024).

食物是最好的药物(FBM):设计和基线结果从多组随机对照试验在食品不安全的产后母亲在德克萨斯州。
背景:食品即医学(FIM)干预措施将支持健康的食品计划与医疗保健系统联系起来,显示出巨大的临床和经济效益。然而,很少有FIM研究关注产后母亲的健康,这是一个在关键时期面临独特脆弱性的人群。食物是最好的药物(FBM)是一项为期8周,以家庭分娩为基础的FIM干预,针对经历食物不安全的产后母亲。通过医疗保健提供者和社区组织之间的伙伴关系发展起来的FBM干预措施将食品配送与支持性服务结合起来。在这里,我们描述了研究设计,并提出了一项研究的基线结果,该研究评估了用不同的可持续性增强模式补充FBM干预的影响。方法:食品是最好的药物(FBM)研究是一项在德克萨斯州中部进行的三组随机对照试验。食物不安全的产后母亲(n = 150)随机接受:(1)FBM-Standard(8周食物递送),(2)FBM-CHW(标准递送加社区卫生工作者(CHW)支持),或(3)FBM-Virtual(标准递送加在线教育平台)。主要计划结果测量包括食品安全、水果、蔬菜和全谷物摄入。次要计划结果测量包括营养安全、母乳喂养率、心理健康、经济压力和烹饪行为。在随机化之前,通过电话或在线调查收集基线数据。结果:参与者主要是西班牙裔(71%)和西班牙语(79%),平均家庭收入为20,620美元(SD = 18,190美元)。大多数人生活在有多个孩子的家庭中(74%),其中儿童和成人的人数分别在1至15人和1至9人之间,并且接受的正规教育有限(38%没有高中文凭)。没有收集婚姻状况。在基线时,89%的人处于粮食不安全状态。抑郁症筛查显示,13%的参与者存在心理健康问题。10项饮食筛选问卷用于评估水果和蔬菜的摄入量。水果和蔬菜的平均消费量为每天3.9杯,但全麦面包和煮熟的全谷物的消费量很低,大约每周一次。结论:FBM研究采用多成分,随机设计来评估食品不安全产后母亲的FIM干预的变化。该干预措施包括食品配送、CHW支持和虚拟教育组件。正在进行的分析将评估这些办法在改善产后粮食安全和相关产妇保健结果方面的潜力。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06428578(注册于2024年5月20日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书