Supra-papillary versus trans-papillary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Otavio Cosendey Martins, Vanio Antunes, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Tulio L Correa, Natália Junkes Milioli, Matheus Vanzin Fernandes, Stefano Baraldo, Babu P Mohan, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Supra-papillary versus trans-papillary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Otavio Cosendey Martins, Vanio Antunes, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Tulio L Correa, Natália Junkes Milioli, Matheus Vanzin Fernandes, Stefano Baraldo, Babu P Mohan, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2026.2694745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) encompasses a variety of malignant obstructions of the extrahepatic biliary tree. The relatively common occurrence of duodenobiliary reflux (DBR) in patients with standard transpapillary stent placement for palliative management raises the importance of the development of alternative methods to prevent adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare supra-papillary to trans-papillary stenting in patients with MBO for stent dysfunction and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized trials. Outcomes assessed included stent occlusion, stent migration, cholangitis, stent patency duration, and overall survival. Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.3.1) and a random-effects model was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 3 randomized trials with 161 patients (80 in the supra-papilla stent group <i>vs.</i> 81 in the trans-papilla group). Supra-papillary stent placement was associated with significantly lower rates of stent occlusion (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97; <i>p</i> = 0.027), and longer cumulative duration of stent patency (MD 65.29; 95% CI 4.87 to 125.71; <i>p</i> = 0.03). The analyses of stent migration (<i>p</i> = 0.473), occurrence of cholangitis (<i>p</i> = 0.519), and patient survival (95% CI -1.64 to 179.38; <i>p</i> = 0.05) revealed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant improvement in stent occlusion rates and cumulative duration of stent patency favoring the supra-papilla group, with no difference for stent migration, occurrence of cholangitis, and patient survival for this comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"934-937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2026.2694745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) encompasses a variety of malignant obstructions of the extrahepatic biliary tree. The relatively common occurrence of duodenobiliary reflux (DBR) in patients with standard transpapillary stent placement for palliative management raises the importance of the development of alternative methods to prevent adverse outcomes.

Aims: To compare supra-papillary to trans-papillary stenting in patients with MBO for stent dysfunction and adverse events.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized trials. Outcomes assessed included stent occlusion, stent migration, cholangitis, stent patency duration, and overall survival. Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.3.1) and a random-effects model was employed.

Results: We found 3 randomized trials with 161 patients (80 in the supra-papilla stent group vs. 81 in the trans-papilla group). Supra-papillary stent placement was associated with significantly lower rates of stent occlusion (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97; p = 0.027), and longer cumulative duration of stent patency (MD 65.29; 95% CI 4.87 to 125.71; p = 0.03). The analyses of stent migration (p = 0.473), occurrence of cholangitis (p = 0.519), and patient survival (95% CI -1.64 to 179.38; p = 0.05) revealed no significant differences.

Conclusion: We found a significant improvement in stent occlusion rates and cumulative duration of stent patency favoring the supra-papilla group, with no difference for stent migration, occurrence of cholangitis, and patient survival for this comparison.

恶性胆道梗阻的乳头上支架与经乳头支架:随机试验的最新荟萃分析。
背景:恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)包括肝外胆道的多种恶性梗阻。采用标准的经动脉支架置入术进行姑息治疗的患者中相对常见的十二指肠胆汁反流(DBR)的发生,提高了开发替代方法以预防不良后果的重要性。目的:比较MBO患者的支架功能障碍和不良事件的乳头上支架和经乳头支架。方法:系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane的随机试验。评估的结果包括支架闭塞、支架移位、胆管炎、支架通畅时间和总生存期。统计学分析采用R(4.3.1版),采用随机效应模型。结果:我们发现了3个随机试验,涉及161例患者(80例乳头上支架组,81例乳头外支架组)。乳头上支架置入术与支架闭塞率显著降低(RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59 ~ 0.97; p = 0.027)和支架累计通畅时间延长相关(MD 65.29; 95% CI 4.87 ~ 125.71; p = 0.03)。支架移位(p = 0.473)、胆管炎发生率(p = 0.519)、患者生存率(95% CI -1.64 ~ 179.38; p = 0.05)分析显示,两组间无显著差异。结论:我们发现乳头上组在支架闭塞率和支架累计通畅时间上有显著改善,在支架迁移、胆管炎的发生和患者生存方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书