Drug prescription before and after implementation of a CPOE system on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit: a quality improvement study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2026-06-18 DOI:10.57187/%x
Rebecca Angresius, Katharina Wyss, Diana Reppucci, Florian Rebling, Ulrike Subotic, Verena Gotta
{"title":"Drug prescription before and after implementation of a CPOE system on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit: a quality improvement study.","authors":"Rebecca Angresius, Katharina Wyss, Diana Reppucci, Florian Rebling, Ulrike Subotic, Verena Gotta","doi":"10.57187/%x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aims: </strong>Paediatric drug prescription is complex, especially in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), where errors may be particularly harmful due to frequent use of high-risk medications. The widespread use of electronic prescriptions is a national goal in Switzerland to improve the quality of prescriptions and reduce medication errors.With this background, this study assessed the quality of drug prescriptions before and after implementation of electronic prescriptions on the PICU of a tertiary Paediatric University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement study was conducted during implementation of a Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) on the PICU of a Swiss paediatric university hospital. A paediatric dosing standard with an integrated dose calculator was incorporated as a default clinical decision support tool. Manual prescriptions before (April-September 2022) and electronic prescriptions after (September-December 2022) CPOE implementation were assessed for (1) dose calculation errors (primary outcome), (2) eight quality criteria defining a formally complete prescription according to the internal medication standard and (3) dose compatibility with the paediatric dosing standard (secondary outcomes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 767 (348 manual, 419 electronic) prescriptions from 107 patients (53 before and 54 after CPOE implementation) were collected. No dose calculation errors were detected in electronic prescriptions versus three in manual prescriptions (0.8%, p = 0.09) from three patients (5.6%). A total of 16 (5%) manual prescriptions were formally complete versus 197 (47%) of electronic prescriptions following CPOE implementation (p <0.001) according to the internal medication standard. The most frequently missing elements in manual prescriptions were total daily dose (64%), pharmaceutical form (58%) or brand name (32%), versus total daily dose (38%), pharmaceutical form (25%) or strength (2%) in electronic prescriptions. Dosing was consistent with the paediatric dosing standard in 235 (68%) of manual prescriptions and 313 (75%) of electronic prescriptions (p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this quality study provide arguments for the potential of CPOE with integrated paediatric dose selection and calculation to improve paediatric medication safety on PICU, in particular by increasing completeness and standardisation of drug prescriptions. Nevertheless, only 47% of electronic prescriptions were formally complete, and new potential sources of prescribing errors linked to increased complexity of drug prescriptions were seen. This underlines the need for close interdisciplinary monitoring of electronic prescription systems, additional training time for users, and flexibility for adjustments based on user experience with corresponding dedicated resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"4978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/%x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study aims: Paediatric drug prescription is complex, especially in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), where errors may be particularly harmful due to frequent use of high-risk medications. The widespread use of electronic prescriptions is a national goal in Switzerland to improve the quality of prescriptions and reduce medication errors.With this background, this study assessed the quality of drug prescriptions before and after implementation of electronic prescriptions on the PICU of a tertiary Paediatric University Hospital.

Methods: This quality improvement study was conducted during implementation of a Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) on the PICU of a Swiss paediatric university hospital. A paediatric dosing standard with an integrated dose calculator was incorporated as a default clinical decision support tool. Manual prescriptions before (April-September 2022) and electronic prescriptions after (September-December 2022) CPOE implementation were assessed for (1) dose calculation errors (primary outcome), (2) eight quality criteria defining a formally complete prescription according to the internal medication standard and (3) dose compatibility with the paediatric dosing standard (secondary outcomes).

Results: A total of 767 (348 manual, 419 electronic) prescriptions from 107 patients (53 before and 54 after CPOE implementation) were collected. No dose calculation errors were detected in electronic prescriptions versus three in manual prescriptions (0.8%, p = 0.09) from three patients (5.6%). A total of 16 (5%) manual prescriptions were formally complete versus 197 (47%) of electronic prescriptions following CPOE implementation (p <0.001) according to the internal medication standard. The most frequently missing elements in manual prescriptions were total daily dose (64%), pharmaceutical form (58%) or brand name (32%), versus total daily dose (38%), pharmaceutical form (25%) or strength (2%) in electronic prescriptions. Dosing was consistent with the paediatric dosing standard in 235 (68%) of manual prescriptions and 313 (75%) of electronic prescriptions (p = 0.035).

Conclusion: The findings of this quality study provide arguments for the potential of CPOE with integrated paediatric dose selection and calculation to improve paediatric medication safety on PICU, in particular by increasing completeness and standardisation of drug prescriptions. Nevertheless, only 47% of electronic prescriptions were formally complete, and new potential sources of prescribing errors linked to increased complexity of drug prescriptions were seen. This underlines the need for close interdisciplinary monitoring of electronic prescription systems, additional training time for users, and flexibility for adjustments based on user experience with corresponding dedicated resources.

儿科重症监护病房实施CPOE系统前后的药物处方:一项质量改进研究。
研究目的:儿科药物处方是复杂的,特别是在儿科重症监护病房(PICU),由于频繁使用高风险药物,错误可能特别有害。在瑞士,广泛使用电子处方是提高处方质量和减少用药错误的国家目标。在此背景下,本研究对某三级儿科大学医院PICU实施电子处方前后的处方质量进行了评估。方法:本质量改进研究是在瑞士一所儿科大学医院PICU实施电脑化医嘱录入系统(CPOE)期间进行的。一个带有综合剂量计算器的儿科给药标准被纳入默认的临床决策支持工具。评估CPOE实施前(2022年4月至9月)的手动处方和实施后(2022年9月至12月)的电子处方(1)剂量计算误差(主要结局),(2)根据内部用药标准定义正式完整处方的8项质量标准,(3)与儿科给药标准的剂量相容性(次要结局)。结果:共收集到107例患者(实施CPOE前53例,实施CPOE后54例)的处方767张,其中手工处方348张,电子处方419张。3例患者(5.6%)的电子处方中未发现剂量计算错误,而手工处方中有3例(0.8%,p = 0.09)。实施CPOE后,共有16张(5%)手动处方正式完成,197张(47%)电子处方正式完成(p结论:本质量研究的结果为CPOE整合儿科剂量选择和计算的潜力提供了论证,以提高PICU儿科用药安全性,特别是通过提高药物处方的完整性和标准化。然而,只有47%的电子处方是正式完整的,并且发现了与药物处方复杂性增加有关的新的处方错误潜在来源。这突出表明需要对电子处方系统进行密切的跨学科监测,为用户提供额外的培训时间,并根据用户经验灵活地调整相应的专用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书