Reconsidering Whether Knuckle-Walking Gave Rise to Bipedalism in Light of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Dean Falk
{"title":"Reconsidering Whether Knuckle-Walking Gave Rise to Bipedalism in Light of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis","authors":"Dean Falk","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Paleoanthropologists debate whether the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans moved terrestrially by knuckle-walking or in some other manner preadapted for bipedalism. The answer to this question would shed light on the emergence of one of the most definitive features of early hominins—habitual terrestrial bipedalism. Comparative morphological studies of apes, australopithecines, and modern humans, and investigations of the few putative earliest hominins have failed to resolve this issue. Here, the knuckle-walking question is approached by comparing the ontogenetic development of locomotor milestones in extant humans and chimpanzees in view of the extended evolutionary synthesis (EES), which extends the traditional modern synthesis' relatively narrow focus on natural selection and genetics by considering the plurality of factors that influence evolutionary processes, including development, organism-environment interactions, and epigenetics. Although the neuromuscular development of locomotor milestones is similar in chimpanzees and humans, chimpanzees do not crawl on their hands and knees, and human babies do not knuckle-walk. Palmigrade quadrupedalism briefly precedes development of knuckle-walking in chimpanzees. Converging data suggest that hands-and-knees crawling in hominin infants derived from a developmentally driven evolutionary transformation of chimpanzee-like palmigrade quadrupedalism in response to the progressive elongation of legs that accompanied selection for bipedalism. Modern human behaviors such as knocking on doors and boxing reinforce the hypothesis that hominins are, indeed, descended from knuckle-walkers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"190 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paleoanthropologists debate whether the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans moved terrestrially by knuckle-walking or in some other manner preadapted for bipedalism. The answer to this question would shed light on the emergence of one of the most definitive features of early hominins—habitual terrestrial bipedalism. Comparative morphological studies of apes, australopithecines, and modern humans, and investigations of the few putative earliest hominins have failed to resolve this issue. Here, the knuckle-walking question is approached by comparing the ontogenetic development of locomotor milestones in extant humans and chimpanzees in view of the extended evolutionary synthesis (EES), which extends the traditional modern synthesis' relatively narrow focus on natural selection and genetics by considering the plurality of factors that influence evolutionary processes, including development, organism-environment interactions, and epigenetics. Although the neuromuscular development of locomotor milestones is similar in chimpanzees and humans, chimpanzees do not crawl on their hands and knees, and human babies do not knuckle-walk. Palmigrade quadrupedalism briefly precedes development of knuckle-walking in chimpanzees. Converging data suggest that hands-and-knees crawling in hominin infants derived from a developmentally driven evolutionary transformation of chimpanzee-like palmigrade quadrupedalism in response to the progressive elongation of legs that accompanied selection for bipedalism. Modern human behaviors such as knocking on doors and boxing reinforce the hypothesis that hominins are, indeed, descended from knuckle-walkers.

从扩展进化综合的角度重新考虑指关节行走是否产生了两足动物。
古人类学家争论黑猩猩和人类的共同祖先是通过指关节行走还是以其他方式预先适应两足动物在陆地上移动。这个问题的答案将有助于揭示早期人类最明确的特征之一——习惯性陆栖两足动物的出现。对类人猿、南方古猿和现代人的比较形态学研究,以及对少数被认为最早的人类的调查,都未能解决这个问题。本文从扩展进化综合(EES)的角度,通过比较现存人类和黑猩猩运动里程碑的个体发育来探讨关节行走问题。扩展进化综合(EES)通过考虑影响进化过程的多种因素,包括发育、生物-环境相互作用和表观遗传学,扩展了传统的现代综合(相对狭窄的自然选择和遗传学)。虽然黑猩猩和人类的运动里程碑的神经肌肉发育是相似的,但黑猩猩不会用手和膝盖爬行,人类婴儿也不会用指关节走路。在黑猩猩的关节行走发展之前,四足动物短暂地迁移。越来越多的数据表明,古人类婴儿的手和膝盖爬行来自于一种发育驱动的进化转变,即类似黑猩猩的palmigrade四足动物的进化转变,以回应伴随两足动物选择而来的腿的逐渐延长。现代人类的行为,如敲门和拳击,强化了人类确实是从指关节行走者进化而来的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书