Tampon test measurement properties in women with provoked vestibulodynia: baseline data from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfag051
Slawomir Wojniusz, Kristine Grimen Danielsen, Mette Bøymo Kaarbø, Anne Lise Ording Helgesen
{"title":"Tampon test measurement properties in women with provoked vestibulodynia: baseline data from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Slawomir Wojniusz, Kristine Grimen Danielsen, Mette Bøymo Kaarbø, Anne Lise Ording Helgesen","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfag051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a common cause of dyspareunia in young women. Because intercourse-related pain cannot be assessed consistently in all affected women, the tampon test (TT) is often used as a standardized proxy for insertional pain. This study aimed to evaluate within-person variability, measurement precision, and convergent validity of the TT, and to describe baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of women enrolled in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of PVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women aged 18-35 years with diagnosed PVD completed baseline questionnaires and 3 standardized TT assessments over 1 week. TT pain was rated on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Baseline characteristics were described for the total sample and stratified by PVD onset type. Systematic change across TT repetitions, minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95), and correlations between TT pain and recalled pain during last intercourse were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six participants completed baseline assessment. Median age was 26.5 years, median symptom duration was 6.0 years, and 40% had primary PVD. Participants showed substantial symptom burden, including impaired sexual function, elevated psychological distress, and reduced health-related quality of life. Women with primary PVD reported higher TT pain than women with secondary PVD, whereas most other baseline characteristics were similar. Mean TT pain decreased slightly across repetitions from 5.1 to 4.6, although approximately 30% of participants showed fluctuations of ≥2 NRS points. Measurement precision improved when repeated TT scores were averaged: MDC95 decreased from 3.8 for a single TT to 2.7 for the mean of two tests and 2.2 for the mean of three tests. TT pain correlated moderately with pain during last intercourse (r = 0.46-0.49).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Women enrolled in this pragmatic PVD trial showed substantial symptom burden and clinical heterogeneity. Repeated TT assessments improved measurement precision and may therefore be preferable when insertional pain is used as an outcome in longitudinal PVD studies, particularly when evaluating within-person change or individual treatment response. TT pain showed partial convergent validity with recalled intercourse pain, but the 2 measures should not be considered interchangeable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":"qfag051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13310756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfag051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a common cause of dyspareunia in young women. Because intercourse-related pain cannot be assessed consistently in all affected women, the tampon test (TT) is often used as a standardized proxy for insertional pain. This study aimed to evaluate within-person variability, measurement precision, and convergent validity of the TT, and to describe baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of women enrolled in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of PVD.

Methods: Women aged 18-35 years with diagnosed PVD completed baseline questionnaires and 3 standardized TT assessments over 1 week. TT pain was rated on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Baseline characteristics were described for the total sample and stratified by PVD onset type. Systematic change across TT repetitions, minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95), and correlations between TT pain and recalled pain during last intercourse were examined.

Results: Eighty-six participants completed baseline assessment. Median age was 26.5 years, median symptom duration was 6.0 years, and 40% had primary PVD. Participants showed substantial symptom burden, including impaired sexual function, elevated psychological distress, and reduced health-related quality of life. Women with primary PVD reported higher TT pain than women with secondary PVD, whereas most other baseline characteristics were similar. Mean TT pain decreased slightly across repetitions from 5.1 to 4.6, although approximately 30% of participants showed fluctuations of ≥2 NRS points. Measurement precision improved when repeated TT scores were averaged: MDC95 decreased from 3.8 for a single TT to 2.7 for the mean of two tests and 2.2 for the mean of three tests. TT pain correlated moderately with pain during last intercourse (r = 0.46-0.49).

Discussion: Women enrolled in this pragmatic PVD trial showed substantial symptom burden and clinical heterogeneity. Repeated TT assessments improved measurement precision and may therefore be preferable when insertional pain is used as an outcome in longitudinal PVD studies, particularly when evaluating within-person change or individual treatment response. TT pain showed partial convergent validity with recalled intercourse pain, but the 2 measures should not be considered interchangeable.

卫生棉条测试在诱发性前庭痛女性中的测量特性:来自一项实用的随机临床试验的基线数据。
诱发性前庭痛(PVD)是年轻女性性交困难的常见原因。由于不能对所有受影响的妇女一致地评估性交相关疼痛,卫生棉条试验(TT)经常被用作插入疼痛的标准化代理。本研究旨在评估TT的人内变异性、测量精度和收敛效度,并描述一项实用的PVD随机临床试验中女性的基线社会人口学和临床特征。方法:年龄18-35岁诊断为PVD的女性在1周内完成基线问卷和3次标准化TT评估。TT疼痛以0-10的数值评定量表(NRS)评定。描述了总样本的基线特征,并按PVD发病类型分层。检查了TT重复的系统性变化,95%置信水平(MDC95)的最小可检测变化,以及TT疼痛与上次性交时回忆疼痛之间的相关性。结果:86名参与者完成了基线评估。中位年龄为26.5岁,中位症状持续时间为6.0年,40%患有原发性PVD。参与者表现出严重的症状负担,包括性功能受损、心理困扰加剧和健康相关生活质量下降。原发性PVD患者报告的TT疼痛高于继发性PVD患者,而大多数其他基线特征相似。平均TT疼痛在重复过程中略有下降,从5.1到4.6,尽管大约30%的参与者表现出≥2个NRS点的波动。当重复TT得分平均时,测量精度得到提高:MDC95从单次TT的3.8下降到两次测试的平均2.7和三次测试的平均2.2。TT疼痛与末次性交疼痛中度相关(r = 0.46-0.49)。讨论:参加这项实用的PVD试验的妇女表现出实质性的症状负担和临床异质性。重复TT评估提高了测量精度,因此当插入疼痛作为纵向PVD研究的结果时,特别是在评估人体内变化或个体治疗反应时,可能更可取。TT疼痛与回忆性交疼痛表现出部分收敛效度,但这两种测量不应被认为是可互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual Medicine
Sexual Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书